应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 科研生活区 » English Cafe » Opinion » 【weekly topic】To dismantle or not dismantle
51/1返回列表
查看: 2538  |  回复: 19
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
本帖产生 2 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

winter_north

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

[交流] 【weekly topic】To dismantle or not dismantle

We are experiencing a rapid urbanization now. The cities are expanding their boundaries to all directions, north, south, east, west, upward, downward. More and more villages are caught into the arms of city. These villages become into village-in-city.

What’s the fate of such urban villages?

I don’t know much about such village. At first sight, the buildings in these villages are not beautiful, some are short, some are tall, but everyone has a similar shape, without little element in their design, they are only built for use, so all the decorations are left out, in order to reduce the cost. Do these houses have pipe line systems for sewage, tap water and gas? I don’t know. Perhaps conditions may be different in different cities.

The lanes in these villages are very narrow, compared with the wide street in the cities. House rent in these villages are low, they become very good homes for newly graduated students and for farmers who come to work in cities.

Often, the building in such villages are not tall, but in one such villages in our city, building are all about 8-10 stories tall, compared with 4-5 in other villages.

In order to make the city beautiful, all the villages are being dismantled now. It is easy to dismantle such villages. Only about 20 days are needed to pull down such a village.

Then taller, more beautiful buildings will be build at the sites of these villages.

It seems who pay for it is not important.

But, obviously, dismantling such buildings is a waste.

A couple of years ago, a 28-story building beside the West Lake in Hangzhou was dismantled. Compared with such a building, buildings in urban villages can only be regarded as nothing.

But, they are buildings, they are built with cement, brick, steel, workers got paid for their building process. Although they are shabby, they are not beautiful, they can still be used. It is said that the life of a building in China is 70 years. But, too often, many buildings are pulled down in their childhood.

A question is, do such building have to be pulled down?

What’s your opinion?

[ Last edited by curton on 2012-9-20 at 23:17 ]
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

Weekly Topic

» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）

倩瑶

» 猜你喜欢
1楼 2012-09-20 21:26:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Kangzhenhua

木虫 (著名写手)
★ ★
shuixian2009: 金币+2, Yeah. It is common in village. The old houses are dismantled and the new ones arise 2012-09-21 12:58:28
For some village, it is necessary to dismantle some old houses, because they are  so old and shabby, and would be destroyed by wind and rain one day.
赞一下 回复此楼
也无风雨也无晴。
8楼2012-09-21 12:25:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 20 个回答

st200403

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

111
★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.2, 抢了个小板凳，给个红包
winter_north: 金币+1, This should be changed. 2012-09-20 22:52:53
Someone said that the average life of a building in China is 30 years
赞一下 回复此楼
Anonymous.
3楼2012-09-20 21:42:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

winter_north

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by st200403 at 2012-09-20 21:42:51
Someone said that the average life of a building in China is 30 years

That's true.
回复此楼
4楼2012-09-20 22:52:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mrzhanglijun

金虫 (正式写手)
shuixian2009: Only English here. Thanks 2012-09-21 12:54:58
给力！作者是国人？

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下 回复此楼
心依旧，执着
5楼2012-09-21 10:32:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 20 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭