| 查看: 16747 | 回复: 63 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒,大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
|
|||
|
前一段时间我投了一篇Crystal Growth & Design,第一次修改是大修,我修改后,编辑又让我小修,小修时编辑和审稿人的回信是这样的 The reviews for your manuscript are enclosed with this letter. Please consider the reviewers' comments. They have raised points that require consideration and revision of the manuscript before it is suitable for publication. However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript should be acceptable for publication in Crystal Growth & Design. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible, 90 days at the latest. We look forward to seeing your paper in Crystal Growth & Design. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after minor revision. Comments: In this revised version, the authors have taken into account most of the reviewers' comment and I find it publishable. My only comment concerns the data listed in Table 2: I do not believe that one can determine them with such an accuracy; uncertainties should be evaluated. 小修我投上去过了25天还是没有消息,我实在等不住了,就给编辑发了一封催稿信,结果两天以后收到编辑的拒稿信,信得内容如下: Thank you for considering Crystal Growth & Design for your manuscript submission. Due to the large number of manuscripts submitted to our journal and the increased demands that are being placed on our reviewers, we must assess closely, and prior to external review by expert specialists, whether a manuscript fits within the scope of the Journal and whether it will have sufficient appeal to a significant segment of our readership. Manuscripts that are not within the scope of the Journal (see http://pubs.acs.org/page/cgdefu/about.html) or do not provide clear evidence for a significant advance that is likely to be of broad interest to the crystal growth or crystal engineering communities, will not be considered further for publication. In my view, your manuscript does not meet these standards and therefore, I regret that we cannot consider it further for publication. Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to Crystal Growth & Design. I hope that you will continue to consider our journal for publication of your papers in the future. 这是怎么回事呀?请各位虫友帮我分析一下啊,好郁闷呀,我感觉我很认真的按照审稿人的意见修改了,怎么还是杯具了! |
» 猜你喜欢
266分,求材料冶金能源化工等调剂
已经有5人回复
265求调剂
已经有6人回复
320分,材料与化工专业,求调剂
已经有3人回复
高温高压反应求助
已经有4人回复
085701环境工程求调剂
已经有7人回复
285求调剂
已经有7人回复
265求调剂11408
已经有3人回复
085701环境工程,267求调剂
已经有11人回复
学硕274求调剂
已经有5人回复
291求调剂
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
帮我看看这断口怎么分析?多谢。
已经有13人回复
请大家帮我分析下该去法国还是去澳大利亚?
已经有37人回复
文章小修后被拒,然后又被接收的曲折之路,散金币!
已经有212人回复
有没有小修后被拒的?
已经有39人回复
对比CrystEngComm和Crystal Growth & Design
已经有11人回复
大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见,录用几率大不?
已经有24人回复
投稿Crystal Growth & Design
已经有34人回复
crystal growth and design审稿周期多长啊,着急。
已经有7人回复
求助crystal growth & design投稿 需要的晶体个数?
已经有5人回复
大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修?希望大吗?(散50B,每人2个)
已经有68人回复
Crystal Growth and Design 小修中的两个棘手问题。
已经有10人回复
被tetrahetron拒稿,大家帮我分析一下!
已经有3人回复
crystal growth design 审稿大家都是多长时间
已经有13人回复
投稿Journal of Crystal Growth被拒,一句内容没看懂,麻烦哪位帮忙解释一下。
已经有16人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
中国散裂中子源诚聘“AI材料计算”方向博士后/职工
+1/393
【强推|可留校】济南大学博士后招聘(水利工程/铁锰碳环境过程)
+1/288
2026年赣南师范大学 电子科学与技术专业(学硕)+ 电子信息工程(专硕)接收调剂学生
+1/199
中飞院航空锂电池团队接受硕士生调剂
+1/74
欢迎环境科学与工程、水利工程专业研究生加入北师大珠海校区董越课题组
+2/54
首都师范大学招收材料与化工专硕调剂生--中科院半导体所共培
+1/43
中原食品实验室 & 郑州轻工业大学2026年硕士研究生联合培养调剂公告
+1/39
天津理工大学国家杰青王铁团队招聘
+1/29
南京林业大学-国家级青年人才团队 招2026级博士、硕士(合成化学、植物化学方向)
+1/20
博士科研人员(化学过程工艺与硬件系统工程)
+1/12
课题组招收专业代码08开头的学硕!
+1/9
【博士招生】广东工业大学国家优青课题组招收2026年环境方向博士生
+1/7
基于机器学习和人工智能的结构/合金设计-西安交大
+1/4
宁波东方理工大学余鹏课题组2026年上海交大联培博士生、博士后、科研助理招聘
+1/3
各种IgG抗体表达系统
+1/3
求调剂
+1/2
香港中文大学 生物医学学院/组织工程与再生医学研究所 招聘博士后/研究助理
+1/2
2026南京林业大学双一流建设高校——化学工程学院招收化学/材料相关专业硕士生
+1/2
上海交通大学化学化工学院张智涛课题组诚聘博士后
+1/1
香港大学 化学系 博后招聘
+1/1
42楼2011-06-28 09:35:52
2楼2011-06-27 17:42:57
3楼2011-06-27 17:48:24
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
|
Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. 可能是编辑搞错了,楼上说的对,你仔细核对一下 |
4楼2011-06-27 17:50:21
简单回复
2011-06-27 18:00

















回复此楼
