| 查看: 16706 | 回复: 63 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒，大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
|
|||
|
前一段时间我投了一篇Crystal Growth & Design，第一次修改是大修，我修改后，编辑又让我小修，小修时编辑和审稿人的回信是这样的 The reviews for your manuscript are enclosed with this letter. Please consider the reviewers' comments. They have raised points that require consideration and revision of the manuscript before it is suitable for publication. However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript should be acceptable for publication in Crystal Growth & Design. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible, 90 days at the latest. We look forward to seeing your paper in Crystal Growth & Design. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after minor revision. Comments: In this revised version, the authors have taken into account most of the reviewers' comment and I find it publishable. My only comment concerns the data listed in Table 2: I do not believe that one can determine them with such an accuracy; uncertainties should be evaluated. 小修我投上去过了25天还是没有消息，我实在等不住了，就给编辑发了一封催稿信，结果两天以后收到编辑的拒稿信，信得内容如下： Thank you for considering Crystal Growth & Design for your manuscript submission. Due to the large number of manuscripts submitted to our journal and the increased demands that are being placed on our reviewers, we must assess closely, and prior to external review by expert specialists, whether a manuscript fits within the scope of the Journal and whether it will have sufficient appeal to a significant segment of our readership. Manuscripts that are not within the scope of the Journal (see http://pubs.acs.org/page/cgdefu/about.html) or do not provide clear evidence for a significant advance that is likely to be of broad interest to the crystal growth or crystal engineering communities, will not be considered further for publication. In my view, your manuscript does not meet these standards and therefore, I regret that we cannot consider it further for publication. Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to Crystal Growth & Design. I hope that you will continue to consider our journal for publication of your papers in the future. 这是怎么回事呀？请各位虫友帮我分析一下啊，好郁闷呀，我感觉我很认真的按照审稿人的意见修改了，怎么还是杯具了！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
08工科 320总分 求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
生物学071000 329分求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
306求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
284求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
寻找调剂
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿中南化学（0703）总分337求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
324求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
一志愿 西北大学 ，070300化学学硕，总分287，双非一本，求调剂。
已经有3人回复
-
289求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
319求调剂
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 帮我看看这断口怎么分析？多谢。
已经有13人回复
- 请大家帮我分析下该去法国还是去澳大利亚？
已经有37人回复
- 文章小修后被拒，然后又被接收的曲折之路，散金币！
已经有212人回复
- 有没有小修后被拒的？
已经有39人回复
- 对比CrystEngComm和Crystal Growth & Design
已经有11人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 投稿Crystal Growth & Design
已经有34人回复
- crystal growth and design审稿周期多长啊，着急。
已经有7人回复
- 求助crystal growth & design投稿 需要的晶体个数？
已经有5人回复
- 大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修？希望大吗？（散50B，每人2个）
已经有68人回复
- Crystal Growth and Design 小修中的两个棘手问题。
已经有10人回复
- 被tetrahetron拒稿，大家帮我分析一下！
已经有3人回复
- crystal growth design 审稿大家都是多长时间
已经有13人回复
- 投稿Journal of Crystal Growth被拒，一句内容没看懂，麻烦哪位帮忙解释一下。
已经有16人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
人生已过半程，不惑之年渐近，回望来时路，满心皆是感恩。
+5/1690
-
农业信息工程技术（专硕）招收调剂 沈阳农业大学
+1/181
-
华南理工-广中医联合招收生物医学与材料交叉学科博士生
+1/82
-
浙江大学侯阳教授团队诚聘博士后---高性能固态电解质与固态电池器件设计
+1/80
-
飘在美国，有点想家
+1/51
-
Alicat 层流压差质量流量控制器在新型硅碳负极流化床的应用- 艾里卡特（Alicat）
+3/46
-
江苏科技大学能源材料化学课题组郭兴梅教授招收博士研究生1-2名
+1/45
-
催化方向推荐一个极好的博导
+1/33
-
天津工业大学双一流高校招博士、硕士、博士后
+1/8
-
福州大学国家级人才汤育欣教授课题组2026年招收”申请考核制“储能电池方向博士研究生
+1/6
-
深圳信息职业大学招聘联合培养硕博研究生（急）
+1/6
-
5han一本强校招收材料专业硕士
+1/5
-
湘潭大学教师招聘
+1/4
-
26申博自荐
+1/4
-
211/双一流石河子大学化学化工学院--电催化，CO2转化
+1/3
-
招收化工与材料学科点研究生
+1/3
-
MDPI下IJMS投稿 pending editor decision 9天
+1/3
-
2026考研的同学，分数不够？想调剂上岸的同学，来看
+1/2
-
武汉纺织大学纺织纤维及制品教育部重点实验室招收博士研究生
+1/2
-
“机械、材料”招生
+1/1
3楼2011-06-27 17:48:24
2楼2011-06-27 17:42:57
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
|
Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. 可能是编辑搞错了，楼上说的对，你仔细核对一下 |
4楼2011-06-27 17:50:21
5楼2011-06-27 17:50:43
简单回复
2011-06-27 18:00
