| 查看: 16218 | 回复: 63 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒,大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
|
|||
|
前一段时间我投了一篇Crystal Growth & Design,第一次修改是大修,我修改后,编辑又让我小修,小修时编辑和审稿人的回信是这样的 The reviews for your manuscript are enclosed with this letter. Please consider the reviewers' comments. They have raised points that require consideration and revision of the manuscript before it is suitable for publication. However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript should be acceptable for publication in Crystal Growth & Design. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible, 90 days at the latest. We look forward to seeing your paper in Crystal Growth & Design. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after minor revision. Comments: In this revised version, the authors have taken into account most of the reviewers' comment and I find it publishable. My only comment concerns the data listed in Table 2: I do not believe that one can determine them with such an accuracy; uncertainties should be evaluated. 小修我投上去过了25天还是没有消息,我实在等不住了,就给编辑发了一封催稿信,结果两天以后收到编辑的拒稿信,信得内容如下: Thank you for considering Crystal Growth & Design for your manuscript submission. Due to the large number of manuscripts submitted to our journal and the increased demands that are being placed on our reviewers, we must assess closely, and prior to external review by expert specialists, whether a manuscript fits within the scope of the Journal and whether it will have sufficient appeal to a significant segment of our readership. Manuscripts that are not within the scope of the Journal (see http://pubs.acs.org/page/cgdefu/about.html) or do not provide clear evidence for a significant advance that is likely to be of broad interest to the crystal growth or crystal engineering communities, will not be considered further for publication. In my view, your manuscript does not meet these standards and therefore, I regret that we cannot consider it further for publication. Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to Crystal Growth & Design. I hope that you will continue to consider our journal for publication of your papers in the future. 这是怎么回事呀?请各位虫友帮我分析一下啊,好郁闷呀,我感觉我很认真的按照审稿人的意见修改了,怎么还是杯具了! |
» 猜你喜欢
回收溶剂求助
已经有7人回复
职称评审没过,求安慰
已经有40人回复
硝基苯如何除去
已经有3人回复
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有17人回复
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志,到最后选publishing options时页面空白,不能完成投稿
已经有22人回复
申请26博士
已经有5人回复
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
毕业后当辅导员了,天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
求助文献
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
帮我看看这断口怎么分析?多谢。
已经有13人回复
请大家帮我分析下该去法国还是去澳大利亚?
已经有37人回复
文章小修后被拒,然后又被接收的曲折之路,散金币!
已经有212人回复
有没有小修后被拒的?
已经有39人回复
对比CrystEngComm和Crystal Growth & Design
已经有11人回复
大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见,录用几率大不?
已经有24人回复
投稿Crystal Growth & Design
已经有34人回复
crystal growth and design审稿周期多长啊,着急。
已经有7人回复
求助crystal growth & design投稿 需要的晶体个数?
已经有5人回复
大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修?希望大吗?(散50B,每人2个)
已经有68人回复
Crystal Growth and Design 小修中的两个棘手问题。
已经有10人回复
被tetrahetron拒稿,大家帮我分析一下!
已经有3人回复
crystal growth design 审稿大家都是多长时间
已经有13人回复
投稿Journal of Crystal Growth被拒,一句内容没看懂,麻烦哪位帮忙解释一下。
已经有16人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
推荐给英语教学者的一本单词书《金鱼单词讲义:从26个拉丁字母到106万个英语单词》
+3/927
郑州大学招收2026年外科学博士研究生
+1/464
虚位以待,共探前沿:热烈欢迎报考北京工业大学纳米多孔材料课题组2026级博士研究生
+1/287
新加坡国立大学张阳教授课题组招聘博士后(AI与生物医学方向)
+1/181
湖南师范大学蒋乐勇教授课题组招收2026届“申请-考核”制博士生
+1/178
接样SEM/XPS/XRD/FTIR/BET等多种测试/提供预存服务
+1/88
广州海洋实验室海洋环境微生物组学及资源化利用团队博士后招聘(长期有效)
+1/78
玩个游戏吧
+2/74
中国计量大学集成电路与微系统国家高层次人才团队招收博士生
+1/51
【CSC招生】荷兰莱顿大学医学中心LKEB图像处理实验室 招收2026年CSC博士生多名
+1/39
高端材料科研产品技术顾问-顶尖材料公司诚邀广大科研背景同学加入!
+1/37
国家青年人才叶立群教授课题组招收2026级博士研究生
+1/33
湖南师范大学杨亚辉/江浩团队招收电催化方向2026年博士生1名
+1/28
国家高层次人才引进
+1/25
上海交通大学机械与动力工程学院周宝文博士后招聘(化学、材料与能源动力等方向)
+1/25
诚邀博士后合作研究人员
+1/5
实验室研究员
+1/5
中国科大化学与材料科学学院/苏州高研院刘东/熊宇杰教授团队诚聘博士后
+1/3
求一种水性聚氨酯固化剂
+1/2
长春工业大学 机电工程学院 韩玲教授 招收审核制2026年秋季入学博士生
+1/2
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
|
Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. 可能是编辑搞错了,楼上说的对,你仔细核对一下 |
4楼2011-06-27 17:50:21
2楼2011-06-27 17:42:57
3楼2011-06-27 17:48:24
5楼2011-06-27 17:50:43
简单回复
2011-06-27 18:00
















回复此楼
