24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

末页

20020824

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 6 (幼儿园)
金币: 1266.3
散金: 605
红花: 4
帖子: 690
在线: 424.8小时
虫号: 1048061
注册: 2010-06-27
专业: 机械结构强度学

[交流] 大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修？希望大吗？（散50B，每人2个）已有40人参与

论文初审结果出来了，大家帮看下有戏吗？
我是7月7号投艾斯维尔旗下的SCI-E期刊XXX，8月16号underview，9月20号Required Reviews Completed。今天给出结果，如下：

Dear Mr. XXX,

The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form.

However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript.

Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments.

If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also:

a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments

  AND/OR

b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed

To submit your revision, please do the following:

1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/XXXX（期刊名）/

2. Enter your login details

3. Click [Author Login]
This takes you to the Author Main Menu.

4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision]
I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Yours sincerely,

XXX（这个是主编）
Receiving Editor

Reviewers' comments:-

Please find my comments regarding refereeing of the above referenced manuscript.  There is no problem technically with the paper, although similar studies have been reported in the past, and except some minor clarifications in terms of modelling issues. However, the format of some sentences is rather poor throughout the manuscript.  I have made most necessary changes, but not all since there are too many, accordingly in order to make it more readable. Objectives and technical points discussed have been thoroughly reviewed. References, figures and tables have all been checked as well.  I would consider this paper acceptable for publication subject to the implementation of the proposed changes outlined below.

Changes required are:-

Page 4
The study on the crash characteristics..........rail has been one of the important technical matters in the field of crash......have been made.
Abe et al. [8] is wrongly referenced.  Check he validity of this reference.

Ohkami et al. [7] and ...closed-hat, S-shaped section rails, where the deformation mode and ...........
XXXXXXXXX(都是关于文章词句修改方面的建议)

Note to authors:-  NOTE THAT IS NOT AN IDEAL WAY TO LOAD THE STRUCTURE BY FIXING THE FRONT CRASH NODES TO THE RIGID WALL by opting for constraint extra nodes method of attachments.

IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORS:-
In Section 2.2 end of paragraph 1 the authors need to clearly clarify the method the two parts of the S-section, namely the overlap of the two materials, aluminium in front and AHSS at the back, are connected in their FE model.  For instance, have they used the "tied-interface" or other options and if so what are the failure parameters for the interface failure(connection zone)?  If they are defined not to fail, then it has to be clearly specified, otherwise the r loads should be given.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX（此处又是一些关于文章词句修改方面的建议）

REFERENCES
Reference [8] is not the same as that mentioned in page 4 for Abe et a..  This requires clarification in both places.

FIGURES
Caption correction with reference to be give.
Fig.2. Relationship between..............................for DP300/500, [13]
Fig.6. Response curves: (a) force response; (b) absorbed energy response

TABLES
Caption correction with reference to be given
Table 1 Mechanical properties of aluminium alloys [13]

另外，我登陆这个期刊后，主编应该是给了修改的机会的，见下面截图。大家看看，这个希望大吗？新虫第一次投国外期刊，很是没有经验，还请大家多指点！