| 查看: 7309 | 回复: 68 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
20020824金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修？希望大吗？（散50B，每人2个） 已有40人参与
|
||
|
论文初审结果出来了，大家帮看下有戏吗？ 我是7月7号投艾斯维尔旗下的SCI-E期刊XXX，8月16号underview，9月20号Required Reviews Completed。今天给出结果，如下： Dear Mr. XXX, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/XXXX（期刊名）/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Yours sincerely, XXX（这个是主编） Receiving Editor Reviewers' comments:- Please find my comments regarding refereeing of the above referenced manuscript. There is no problem technically with the paper, although similar studies have been reported in the past, and except some minor clarifications in terms of modelling issues. However, the format of some sentences is rather poor throughout the manuscript. I have made most necessary changes, but not all since there are too many, accordingly in order to make it more readable. Objectives and technical points discussed have been thoroughly reviewed. References, figures and tables have all been checked as well. I would consider this paper acceptable for publication subject to the implementation of the proposed changes outlined below. Changes required are:- Page 4 The study on the crash characteristics..........rail has been one of the important technical matters in the field of crash......have been made. Abe et al. [8] is wrongly referenced. Check he validity of this reference. Ohkami et al. [7] and ...closed-hat, S-shaped section rails, where the deformation mode and ........... XXXXXXXXX(都是关于文章词句修改方面的建议) Note to authors:- NOTE THAT IS NOT AN IDEAL WAY TO LOAD THE STRUCTURE BY FIXING THE FRONT CRASH NODES TO THE RIGID WALL by opting for constraint extra nodes method of attachments. IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORS:- In Section 2.2 end of paragraph 1 the authors need to clearly clarify the method the two parts of the S-section, namely the overlap of the two materials, aluminium in front and AHSS at the back, are connected in their FE model. For instance, have they used the "tied-interface" or other options and if so what are the failure parameters for the interface failure(connection zone)? If they are defined not to fail, then it has to be clearly specified, otherwise the r loads should be given. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX（此处又是一些关于文章词句修改方面的建议） REFERENCES Reference [8] is not the same as that mentioned in page 4 for Abe et a.. This requires clarification in both places. FIGURES Caption correction with reference to be give. Fig.2. Relationship between..............................for DP300/500, [13] Fig.6. Response curves: (a) force response; (b) absorbed energy response TABLES Caption correction with reference to be given Table 1 Mechanical properties of aluminium alloys [13] 另外，我登陆这个期刊后，主编应该是给了修改的机会的，见下面截图。大家看看，这个希望大吗？新虫第一次投国外期刊，很是没有经验，还请大家多指点！  [ Last edited by 20020824 on 2010-10-23 at 20:12 ] |
回复此楼» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
liuhaiying918» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有5人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有8人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有7人回复
-
申请删除本帖
已经有7人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有10人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有11人回复
-
基金未中，这种答复是模板吗？
已经有6人回复
-
看板上这么多中的，有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉……
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 一年后收到初审意见没标明大修还是小修
已经有9人回复
- 紧急求助:Energy srouces 一次大修，一次小修后拒稿，能够给主编写信说明情况
已经有20人回复
- Electrochimica Acta 二审编辑的回信没有说大修小修
已经有40人回复
- 我的第一SCI投稿返回意见了，这个算大修还是小修？ Physica A
已经有11人回复
- PRB这样的审稿意见算是大修还是小修？
已经有6人回复
- 两个大修，一个小修，希望大吗？
已经有9人回复
- 大家帮我看看，我这种情况属于大修还是小修？
已经有3人回复
- Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒，大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
已经有63人回复
- 请看下这个是大修还是小修
已经有18人回复
- 一个说据，一个说小修，结果裁定为大修
已经有28人回复
- 主编意思含糊，大家帮着看一下是大修还是小修
已经有21人回复
- ChemComm从小修变成大修－悲哀阿，痛心阿，百感交集
已经有18人回复
- 帮我看看啊:编辑是要大修还是小修？
已经有15人回复
3楼2010-09-23 22:45:16
2楼2010-09-23 22:37:53
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
5楼2010-09-23 23:01:32
passionfly
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 593.4
- 散金: 187
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 133
- 在线: 116.7小时
- 虫号: 717276
- 注册: 2009-03-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 防灾工程
7楼2010-09-23 23:20:29
10