24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2520  |  回复: 19
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lrx9023

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 小修后又小修 意见回来了 求助 已有3人参与

小修提交后两个多月  终于在今天给了结果 却还是小修  小修后换了审稿人 又提了很多新的意见
求大神帮忙看看什么意思  我没有看懂 先谢谢了!

Reviewer #2:

1    There are many English language errors throughout the article. Perhaps requires an English language editing process.
2    Whilst the structure of the article appears sound, it doesn't seem to flow and the section titled 'related literature' does not appear to have any context to the method.
3    Lack of contextual definition of the key terms of competency, structure and psychological  and how to be interpreted in the study and article, in the introduction and body of the article.
4    The article lacks essential background detail on students education in China, which makes meaningless the comparison to the international literature, as there is no basis for comparison.
5    There is evidence in the more recent literature from Europe in particular which is contrary to the stance taken by this article on graduate students competence.
6    I'm not sure how the related literature provides context for the study as few links are made.
7    The sections addressing the method of the study requires further work to contextualise data collection and analysis, and defend the instrument used. Results section does not sufficiently inform the discussion.
8    Conclusions are drawn without justification within the discussion section of the article.

I hope these comments assist.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

自私的猫1988

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
lrx9023: 金币+2, 有帮助 2015-04-30 22:07:58
审稿人明显对你的文章背景知识和概念的定义等等不满意,语言也需要修改
2楼2015-04-30 22:04:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

自私的猫1988

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
lrx9023: 金币+5 2015-04-30 22:35:23
引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by lrx9023 at 2015-04-30 22:10:19
噢噢  我都看不明白 第2、6、8条不是很 明白 你能具体跟我说下吗?谢谢你!...

2    Whilst the structure of the article appears sound, it doesn't seem to flow and the section titled 'related literature' does not appear to have any context to the method.
尽管文章结构看上去还行,但是不流畅,这个部分 'related literature' 并未提到任何关于方法的背景介绍
6    I'm not sure how the related literature provides context for the study as few links are made.
相关文献具体如何为研究提供依据,审稿人表示怀疑
8    Conclusions are drawn without justification within the discussion section of the article.
结论部分与讨论部分并不一致,没有在合理的讨论基础上得到结论
5楼2015-04-30 22:27:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 lrx9023 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见