24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3899  |  回复: 8

shaka-fz

新虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 大修之后小修,小修之后被拒了,但是有重投机会,求问我该怎么办? 已有1人参与

我之前投了一篇文章给Biosensors and Bioelectronics。第一次审稿意见是大修,两个审稿人,我修回之后,又要求重修。然后回来的意见是一个收一个拒。编辑说有机会重投。我截取编辑和审稿人意见到下面,求高手帮我分析一下我该怎么办?

Dear Prof. *****,

Your paper has been reviewed and we have carefully considered all our referees' comments concerning your manuscript and reviewed your manuscript. We have unfortunately decided not to publish your paper in
Biosensors and Bioelectronics on this occasion.

However, we would be happy to review your re-submission, as a new submission via the website, if you would like to revise your paper according to our reviewers' comments. In order for us to deal with this rapidly could you please provide a detailed letter containing the manuscript number and your responses specifically and clearly to EACH point raised in the referees' reports.

For each point, please
(a) list the Referees questions;
(b) indicate whether you agree or disagree with the referee and why;
(c) describe what specific changes have been made in response to the points in the revised manuscript and in which pages. Please also highlight the changes to the
manuscript in RED.

We trust that you will not be discouraged from submitting further papers to us in the future. We would like to take this opportunity to thank you for choosing Biosensors and Bioelectronics as your publishing medium.

We have done our utmost to process your manuscript swiftly and fairly. You are welcome to write to us if you believe that we have made a factual error, but in matters of discretion the Editors' decision is final.

Biosensors and Bioelectronics is the principal international journal in its field and is seeking to maintain and continually improve its reputation for publishing top quality papers.

We wish you every success with your future endeavours and hope that we will receive further submissions from you in the future.

The reviewers' comments are appended below.

Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer #1: In the second revision of manuscript, The author just answered my questions, no additional experiment and analysis were added. I still did not satisfy the quality of the manuscript and am not sure if it can be published in BB. It may be batter to ask another reviewer to review this manuscript.  The reviewer I suggested is Prof****** (这里他推荐了另一个审稿人) who works on ……(这里是那个审稿人的研究领域)。

请问我该怎么办?是加数据还是?因为那些数据是不适合加的,而这个审稿人执意要我加,我解释过,他居然就不给机会直接拒了。如果我现在加了数据重新投稿,结果不是送给这个审稿人,那岂不是又要被挑刺?如果我不加数据直接投稿,如果送回给这个审稿人,那肯定悲剧,而且编辑肯定也不会高兴的。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

自私的猫1988

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
shaka-fz: 金币+5, 有帮助 2014-09-28 18:33:10
这个取决于那些数据,你权衡一下
如果不加,写出为什么不需要加这些数据的充分理由,因为新的审稿人会评判
2楼2014-09-28 14:44:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

shaka-fz

新虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 自私的猫1988 at 2014-09-28 14:44:28
这个取决于那些数据,你权衡一下
如果不加,写出为什么不需要加这些数据的充分理由,因为新的审稿人会评判

编辑要我重新投稿,但是同时要求我回复原审稿人意见,并把修改之处给标红,这样的话意思是让新的审稿人仲裁还是什么别的意思?
3楼2014-09-28 16:48:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

自私的猫1988

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by shaka-fz at 2014-09-28 16:48:13
编辑要我重新投稿,但是同时要求我回复原审稿人意见,并把修改之处给标红,这样的话意思是让新的审稿人仲裁还是什么别的意思?...

应该是重新审一遍
4楼2014-09-28 16:56:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

自私的猫1988

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by shaka-fz at 2014-09-28 16:48:13
编辑要我重新投稿,但是同时要求我回复原审稿人意见,并把修改之处给标红,这样的话意思是让新的审稿人仲裁还是什么别的意思?...

应该是重新审一遍
5楼2014-09-28 16:56:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

shaka-fz

新虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 自私的猫1988 at 2014-09-28 16:56:08
应该是重新审一遍...

那也是让新审稿人审了?新的审稿人还能看见过去的投稿和修改历史什么的么?
6楼2014-09-28 18:14:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

自私的猫1988

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by shaka-fz at 2014-09-28 18:14:09
那也是让新审稿人审了?新的审稿人还能看见过去的投稿和修改历史什么的么?...

可以看到
7楼2014-09-28 18:14:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

shaka-fz

新虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by 自私的猫1988 at 2014-09-28 18:14:36
可以看到...

那样的话,我如果删除或者重写原文中不利的段落是不是会弄巧成拙?
8楼2014-09-28 18:21:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

自私的猫1988

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

引用回帖:
8楼: Originally posted by shaka-fz at 2014-09-28 18:21:29
那样的话,我如果删除或者重写原文中不利的段落是不是会弄巧成拙?...

很正常啊,不好的地方修改
9楼2014-09-28 18:31:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 shaka-fz 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[有机交流] 伯胺上甲基求助 100+4 002tmumu 2026-07-14 4/200 2026-07-15 22:01 by 学员oN9JQD
[基金申请] H口,面上,时间戳7月7日。 +3 plumage5 2026-07-15 3/150 2026-07-15 21:06 by 6543yes
[基金申请] 小木虫没落了,除了祈祷帖子,几乎看不到有价值的帖子 +13 botar 2026-07-14 14/700 2026-07-15 19:28 by 寒流32
[基金申请] 会评 +5 无名者登山 2026-07-15 5/250 2026-07-15 18:15 by 杠就是你对
[基金申请] 生生命学部会评 +3 wuke100666 2026-07-15 3/150 2026-07-15 17:11 by kingkocxr
[基金申请] E口会评 +11 布布和一二 2026-07-13 13/650 2026-07-15 16:34 by Kittylucky
[基金申请] E口青C会评结束了吗? 40+3 小小书虫c 2026-07-14 9/450 2026-07-15 16:04 by 安静的知了
[基金申请] 生命口C13面上会评时间 +6 luckinging 2026-07-14 9/450 2026-07-15 14:39 by 雨冰共舞
[教师之家] 内心匮乏 +13 水冰月月野兔 2026-07-12 13/650 2026-07-15 14:21 by jiduquegai
[文学芳草园] 你可曾有过这种感受? +3 Jeanya 2026-07-09 6/300 2026-07-15 11:07 by mbtwt
[论文投稿] 农业机械学报投稿周期 +3 G0DLIN 2026-07-14 7/350 2026-07-15 09:26 by xs74101122
[基金申请] 国自然面上D口祈祷 +4 monkeynana 2026-07-14 4/200 2026-07-15 09:14 by 白水煮
[论文投稿] 跨出版社商投稿 20+4 倪好520 2026-07-13 4/200 2026-07-15 08:35 by bobvan
[基金申请] 没收到消息,再次陪跑 +3 天空星辰fly 2026-07-14 3/150 2026-07-14 19:14 by 6543yes
[基金申请] 不要再数国自然申请书的 filecode 的分隔符个数了 +13 sadpencil 2026-07-12 20/1000 2026-07-14 13:12 by 杠就是你对
[基金申请] 明天E口面上会评 +8 布布和一二 2026-07-12 9/450 2026-07-13 22:59 by QTSorange
[论文投稿] MSER送审了还被拒稿 +4 S778950906 2026-07-08 6/300 2026-07-13 16:22 by tfang
[基金申请] 祈祷青基必中 50+6 hadengry 2026-07-09 16/800 2026-07-12 20:31 by 登山虫虫
[考博] 27届辽宁大学应届毕业生申博 +3 可乐微风大海 2026-07-09 3/150 2026-07-10 21:23 by 贪玩的研究僧
[基金申请] 关于如何从代码看上不上会 +17 且听虎啸 2026-07-09 23/1150 2026-07-10 19:51 by sdfapple719
信息提示
请填处理意见