24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

shaka-fz

新虫 (著名写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 2539.8
散金: 3027
红花: 8
帖子: 1708
在线: 125.9小时
虫号: 819734
注册: 2009-07-31
专业: 环境分析化学

[求助] 大修之后小修，小修之后被拒了，但是有重投机会，求问我该怎么办？已有1人参与

我之前投了一篇文章给Biosensors and Bioelectronics。第一次审稿意见是大修，两个审稿人，我修回之后，又要求重修。然后回来的意见是一个收一个拒。编辑说有机会重投。我截取编辑和审稿人意见到下面，求高手帮我分析一下我该怎么办？

Dear Prof. *****,

Your paper has been reviewed and we have carefully considered all our referees' comments concerning your manuscript and reviewed your manuscript. We have unfortunately decided not to publish your paper in
Biosensors and Bioelectronics on this occasion.

However, we would be happy to review your re-submission, as a new submission via the website, if you would like to revise your paper according to our reviewers' comments. In order for us to deal with this rapidly could you please provide a detailed letter containing the manuscript number and your responses specifically and clearly to EACH point raised in the referees' reports.

For each point, please
(a) list the Referees questions;
(b) indicate whether you agree or disagree with the referee and why;
(c) describe what specific changes have been made in response to the points in the revised manuscript and in which pages. Please also highlight the changes to the
manuscript in RED.

We trust that you will not be discouraged from submitting further papers to us in the future. We would like to take this opportunity to thank you for choosing Biosensors and Bioelectronics as your publishing medium.

We have done our utmost to process your manuscript swiftly and fairly. You are welcome to write to us if you believe that we have made a factual error, but in matters of discretion the Editors' decision is final.

Biosensors and Bioelectronics is the principal international journal in its field and is seeking to maintain and continually improve its reputation for publishing top quality papers.

We wish you every success with your future endeavours and hope that we will receive further submissions from you in the future.

The reviewers' comments are appended below.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: In the second revision of manuscript, The author just answered my questions, no additional experiment and analysis were added. I still did not satisfy the quality of the manuscript and am not sure if it can be published in BB. It may be batter to ask another reviewer to review this manuscript. The reviewer I suggested is Prof****** (这里他推荐了另一个审稿人) who works on ……（这里是那个审稿人的研究领域）。

请问我该怎么办？是加数据还是？因为那些数据是不适合加的，而这个审稿人执意要我加，我解释过，他居然就不给机会直接拒了。如果我现在加了数据重新投稿，结果不是送给这个审稿人，那岂不是又要被挑刺？如果我不加数据直接投稿，如果送回给这个审稿人，那肯定悲剧，而且编辑肯定也不会高兴的。

回复此楼