| 查看: 999 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
帮忙分析一下这个审稿意见如何？先谢谢各位 已有2人参与
|
|||
|
请教各位，我有一篇稿件，审稿意见如下，编辑说 I would be pleased to reconsider my decision，代表什么意思？修改稿还要修回进行外审吗，还是编辑自己会作决定？因为没有提到关于大修还是小修的问题，所以比较迷茫，再次真诚的希望大牛们给予指导。如果再进行修改，不知道接受的希望大不大？Dear Dr. Zou, Dear Dr. XX: Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Reviewers' comments: Please see the report in your account. Please note that from the report it follows that the paper is correct bit there is a lack of originality in the techniques and methods. Please note that not all revised papers are accepted for publication. Reviewer #1: The manuscript under review aims to study "....". The aim of the paper is to generalize some previous results (in particular [13,14]) to the XXXX case involving xxxx. The proofs are quite standard but correct, and the result are of some interests in particular for the specialists in the field. The paper is very well written and so my overall opinion is that it can be considered for publication in XX. Some minor remarks 1. Page 2 Line 20. "Every where" should be replaced by "Everywhere" . 2. Page 2, at the end of the section. "Sect." should be "Section" 3. Page 4 before you state Lemma 3.1. Which Lemma in [16] are you invoking here? 4. Page 5. Either the proof of Theorem 3.1 should be more detailed or you have to give a more precise reference for that. 5. Some lines below. "lemma 3.1" should be "Lemma 3.1" (please check elsewhere) 6. P6, Line 4. "Clearly" is not the right word here. 7. P12. Last formula. I guess the comma is misplaced here, while it is missed in the subsequent formula. Also check a missed comma at page 14 (last formula). 8. In the Title of reference [16] I guess a "solutions" is missed 9. Some missed references you may want to add (mainly in the introduction). [1].... [2]..... |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
什么时候开奖？
已经有10人回复
-
跳槽后在研项目怎么办？
已经有9人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有16人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有14人回复
-
今天放榜吗？
已经有16人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有10人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- SCI审稿人的审稿意见，求助大家帮忙看一下是什么意思，谢谢了！
已经有5人回复
- 这两个审稿意见看不太明白，希望大牛指导一下
已经有4人回复
- 投了篇SCI，审稿人给了几条意见，还望大家帮我分析一下
已经有3人回复
- 编辑给了Revise and reconsider
已经有10人回复
- 请大家帮忙看下这个审稿意见怎么处理好
已经有22人回复
- by independent method是什么意思？
已经有5人回复
- 大牛帮忙分析一下专家意见，下次希望大不大？
已经有5人回复
- 编辑给的审稿意见，怎么解答啊~~谢谢亲们~~
已经有6人回复
- 请大家帮我分析下审稿意见
已经有18人回复
- 我的这个审稿意见是什么意思啊？谢谢
已经有4人回复
- Energy的审稿意见，望各位大侠指导
已经有22人回复
- 大家帮分析下审稿意见
已经有8人回复
- ECM审稿意见返回了，求各位帮忙解读一下，谢谢
已经有28人回复
- 责任编辑给了这样的审稿意见回信，还有希望吗？
已经有7人回复
- 大家帮看一下这个审稿意见棘手不，谢谢了。
已经有22人回复
- 这样的审稿意见如何回复
已经有5人回复
- International Journal of Thermal Sciences,4个审稿人，3个修改后接收，1个拒
已经有19人回复
- 文章第二次修改，有点迷茫
已经有17人回复
- 求高人帮忙分析下APL审稿意见
已经有7人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，大家帮忙分析一下，有些意见看不懂？
已经有14人回复
- synthetic metals 投稿，审稿意见， 请各位帮忙分析一下！
已经有6人回复
- 请帮忙分析一下，谢谢
已经有13人回复
- 【求助】大家帮我分析下审稿人给的评语 （关于纳米颗粒细胞内化）
已经有4人回复
- 帮忙分析一下这个审稿意见如何？先谢谢各位
已经有9人回复
自私的猫1988
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 4800 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 6.746
- 金币: 50040.4
- 散金: 11517
- 红花: 256
- 沙发: 134
- 帖子: 11684
- 在线: 1473.7小时
- 虫号: 2004083
- 注册: 2012-09-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机分子功能材料化学
- 管辖: 论文投稿
【答案】应助回帖
★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
book2005593: 金币+1, 感谢参与解答 2015-04-27 07:52:36
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
book2005593: 金币+1, 感谢参与解答 2015-04-27 07:52:36
|
I would be pleased to reconsider my decision， 这句都是编辑让修改的套话 修改稿还要修回进行外审吗，还是编辑自己会作决定？ 一般还会让审稿人看看再定，极个别编辑直接决定 大修还是小修的问题，所以比较迷茫，再次真诚的希望大牛们给予指导。 你这个不明显，算大修吧，好好修改即可 如果再进行修改，不知道接受的希望大不大？ 问题都比较一般，意见来看文章小毛病比较多，仔细检查避免这些问题，注意审稿人没找出来的 |
4楼2015-04-26 17:03:06
2楼2015-04-26 13:59:40
3楼2015-04-26 14:00:51
