| 查看: 1617 | 回复: 6 | |||
[交流]
synthetic metals 投稿，审稿意见， 请各位帮忙分析一下！
|
|||
|
最近投了一篇synthetic metals 审了4个月 要重投 各位帮忙分析一下 看需要怎么改，初次投稿，不知道怎么办！谢谢 这文章是拒了还是怎么回事？有没有中的可能性，大家帮忙分析一下，非常感谢！ Ms. Ref. No.: SYNMET-D-10-00852 Title: Study of the mechanism of the variable emissivity infrared electrochromic device based on polyaniline conducting polymer Synthetic Metals Dear MR Hua Li, I have now obtained the necessary reviews for your paper. The reviewers have commented on your paper entitled 'Study of the mechanism of the variable emissivity infrared electrochromic device based on polyaniline conducting polymer'. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments when revising your manuscript. Should you choose to send a revised version of your paper, please do so within two months; otherwise, it may be considered by this office as a new submission. Also, if you are submitting a revised manuscript, please enclose the following: a) A letter fully addressing the changes you have incorporated into the revised manuscript in accordance with the referee's recommendations. b) A copy of your revised manuscript showing the changes highlighted. The highlighting can be done in bold, underlined or highlighted font. Please write "highlighted" in the top right corner of this document. c) A copy of the un-highlighted revised manuscript. To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/synmet/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] Bear in mind your revision should be submitted by May 11, 2011. Please note, the revised manuscript is also subject to additional review. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Sincerely, I. Samuel Regional Editor Synthetic Metals Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #2: This article discussed the electrochromic device caused reflectivity and emissivity change for various reasons. on the whole, I think the content of clear thinking, integrity is better. on the whole, I think the content of the article clear thinking, integrity is better. The manuscript should not be accepted at current version. 1.Why you show the reflectance curve of the device at -0.5V and 0.5V, but no 0V in Fig 2? 2.I don't think that "the reflectance of the PANI/PE composite film under different potentials has no discrimination in the mid-IR region". I think there is obvious difference between them. 3.You prove the PANI film is doping state at 0.8V by FTIR-ATR measurement with many paragraphs, it's too long. 4.If you unify the space of abscissa of Fig5 and Fig6, it will be better. 5.There is only one reference published after 2009. More recent references should be analyzed and cited. 第一个审稿人的意见如下： Comments: Authors are made device of PANI using electropolymerization technique and it is interesting work for electrochromic devices and application in IR region. 1) In Experimental, " The electropolymerization solution comprised 1M sulfuric acid and 0.5M aniline monomer Please explain more details of Experimental section and more scientifically. What is working window for PANI during deposition, scan rate, bath temperature, etc.? are they recorded CV during deposition? 2) I think authors may tried to deposit PANI in different oxidizing agents such as ammonium peroxidisulphide (APS)??? 3) What is mean by PES??? 4) Are they checked Raman of deposited PANI? If yes, please add. 5) In fig.5 FTIR-ATR spectrum of the electrochemical polymerization PANI on PES/Au substrate for which potential???? 6) What is the thickness of thin film of PANI?? 7) Please provide FTIR-ATR spectrum for -0.8V, 0V and +0.8 V. 8) At 0 V and 0.8 V, the emissivity of the device in the 8-12 μm region is almost the same and high, while the emissivity is the lowest at -0.8 V, which is consistent with the reflectance of the device. Why? 9) I am still confusing, PANI/PE composite film accord well with the reflectance and emissivity of the device. It composite or layer by layer deposition?? Moreover, the paper is poorly written and has numerous grammatical mistakes. Please check the manuscript by corresponding professor. Hence the paper will be acceptable “After Some Modifications”. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
本人考085602 化学工程 专硕
已经有9人回复
-
材料与化工一志愿南昌大学327求调剂推荐
已经有7人回复
-
326求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
焦虑
已经有8人回复
-
308求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
NSFC申报书里申请人简历中代表性论著还需要在申报书最后的附件里面再上传一遍吗
已经有14人回复
-
化学调剂0703
已经有7人回复
-
327求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
调剂
已经有8人回复
-
梁成伟老师课题组欢迎你的加入
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 审稿人二审意见帮我分析一下！多谢各位大牛
已经有5人回复
- 请各位帮忙看以下审稿意见，不知道如何修改！
已经有3人回复
- 帮忙看一下审稿人意见,谢谢
已经有6人回复
- 求高人帮忙分析下APL审稿意见
已经有7人回复
- SCI审稿意见回来了，编辑给的moderate revision，麻烦大家帮分析一下，有BB
已经有28人回复
- JCA审稿意见返回，编辑要求很严厉，语言的问题，想找一个公司帮忙改，大家推荐下
已经有12人回复
- 投稿有答复了，些许激动请大家帮忙看看，谢谢大家！（在13楼增加第二封审稿意见）
已经有32人回复
- 请大家帮忙分析下这句审稿意见是什么意思
已经有4人回复
- 请大家帮忙分析一下soft matter审稿人给的意见
已经有20人回复
- 专家审稿意见，请大家帮忙分析！
已经有5人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，看不懂是什么意思，请那位大侠帮忙翻译一下？谢谢！
已经有4人回复
- ImechE Power and Energy 第二次大修，请大家帮忙分析一下怎么回复审稿人
已经有10人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- Applied Surface Science审稿意见 帮忙分析下 谢谢
已经有11人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
山东征女友，坐标济南
+1/174
-
冷冻行星球磨机、低温高温球磨机
+1/86
-
重庆医科大学神经科学中心/病生与生理系诚邀海内外优秀博士加盟博士后队伍（长期）
+1/84
-
本安ia MFC用于危险石化环境下的乙炔脱除工艺的精准取样-艾里卡特 (Alicat)
+2/68
-
何时使用 CODA™ 科里奥利质量流量仪表- 艾里卡特（Alicat）
+2/52
-
找工作经验求助
+1/37
-
2026年重庆工商大学管理科学与工程专业学术硕士招生调剂，风景总在柳暗花明处
+1/37
-
招硕士调剂生
+2/36
-
中科院化学所 宋延林 课题组招聘合成化学方向博士后（开展打印合成化学方向研究）
+1/32
-
西安建筑科技大学，樊重庆课题组招收调剂研究生1名。
+2/28
-
上海交通大学药学院高杨课题组诚聘博士后
+1/14
-
江苏大学环境学院课题组长期接收学硕专硕
+1/12
-
西京学院土木水利 2026 级研究生招生相关说明
+1/8
-
博士后招聘（高薪40万+）
+1/8
-
上海科技大学物质学院招收有机化学方向2026级工程博士
+1/8
-
【第三轮招生，31号截止】澳科大诚招2026秋全奖博士研究生（纳米医学/生物材料方向）
+1/6
-
复旦大学集成电路学院程增光课题组急聘科研助理
+1/5
-
上海第二工业大学-朱大海课题组招生（过线就能调剂）
+1/5
-
福建师范大学化学与材料学院杜克钊团队招生
+1/1
-
层流压差式流量测控产品在大气运维采样流量校准中的应用与优势
+1/1
Air2104(金币+5): 2011-04-11 19:52:09
|
晕，恭喜啊，这是revision修回了，让你按着审稿人的意见修改呢。按审稿人的意见修改，肯定接受的。 审稿人2的意见，你2009年后的文献太少，要加一些新文献，FIg2和文中数据不对应。图5和6也要修改下，对你the reflectance of the PANI/PE composite film under different potentials has no discrimination in the mid-IR region". 这句话也有疑问，你的解释一下。 审稿人1的意见，PES的全称，the thickness of thin film of PANI的厚度，-0.8,0.0.8的 FTIR-ATR 图谱 ，等等 最后要仔细修改语言。 所以给你了你revision，对着修改就会接受的。 |
2楼2011-04-11 19:46:39
3楼2011-04-11 19:54:52
4楼2011-04-11 19:58:43
5楼2011-04-11 19:59:15
6楼2011-04-11 20:01:56
简单回复
2011-04-11 20:49
回复
Air2104(金币+1): 2011-04-11 21:04:11
