| 查看: 1542 | 回复: 6 | |||
[交流]
synthetic metals 投稿,审稿意见, 请各位帮忙分析一下!
|
|||
|
最近投了一篇synthetic metals 审了4个月 要重投 各位帮忙分析一下 看需要怎么改,初次投稿,不知道怎么办!谢谢 这文章是拒了还是怎么回事?有没有中的可能性,大家帮忙分析一下,非常感谢! Ms. Ref. No.: SYNMET-D-10-00852 Title: Study of the mechanism of the variable emissivity infrared electrochromic device based on polyaniline conducting polymer Synthetic Metals Dear MR Hua Li, I have now obtained the necessary reviews for your paper. The reviewers have commented on your paper entitled 'Study of the mechanism of the variable emissivity infrared electrochromic device based on polyaniline conducting polymer'. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments when revising your manuscript. Should you choose to send a revised version of your paper, please do so within two months; otherwise, it may be considered by this office as a new submission. Also, if you are submitting a revised manuscript, please enclose the following: a) A letter fully addressing the changes you have incorporated into the revised manuscript in accordance with the referee's recommendations. b) A copy of your revised manuscript showing the changes highlighted. The highlighting can be done in bold, underlined or highlighted font. Please write "highlighted" in the top right corner of this document. c) A copy of the un-highlighted revised manuscript. To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/synmet/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] Bear in mind your revision should be submitted by May 11, 2011. Please note, the revised manuscript is also subject to additional review. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Sincerely, I. Samuel Regional Editor Synthetic Metals Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #2: This article discussed the electrochromic device caused reflectivity and emissivity change for various reasons. on the whole, I think the content of clear thinking, integrity is better. on the whole, I think the content of the article clear thinking, integrity is better. The manuscript should not be accepted at current version. 1.Why you show the reflectance curve of the device at -0.5V and 0.5V, but no 0V in Fig 2? 2.I don't think that "the reflectance of the PANI/PE composite film under different potentials has no discrimination in the mid-IR region". I think there is obvious difference between them. 3.You prove the PANI film is doping state at 0.8V by FTIR-ATR measurement with many paragraphs, it's too long. 4.If you unify the space of abscissa of Fig5 and Fig6, it will be better. 5.There is only one reference published after 2009. More recent references should be analyzed and cited. 第一个审稿人的意见如下: Comments: Authors are made device of PANI using electropolymerization technique and it is interesting work for electrochromic devices and application in IR region. 1) In Experimental, " The electropolymerization solution comprised 1M sulfuric acid and 0.5M aniline monomer Please explain more details of Experimental section and more scientifically. What is working window for PANI during deposition, scan rate, bath temperature, etc.? are they recorded CV during deposition? 2) I think authors may tried to deposit PANI in different oxidizing agents such as ammonium peroxidisulphide (APS)??? 3) What is mean by PES??? 4) Are they checked Raman of deposited PANI? If yes, please add. 5) In fig.5 FTIR-ATR spectrum of the electrochemical polymerization PANI on PES/Au substrate for which potential???? 6) What is the thickness of thin film of PANI?? 7) Please provide FTIR-ATR spectrum for -0.8V, 0V and +0.8 V. 8) At 0 V and 0.8 V, the emissivity of the device in the 8-12 μm region is almost the same and high, while the emissivity is the lowest at -0.8 V, which is consistent with the reflectance of the device. Why? 9) I am still confusing, PANI/PE composite film accord well with the reflectance and emissivity of the device. It composite or layer by layer deposition?? Moreover, the paper is poorly written and has numerous grammatical mistakes. Please check the manuscript by corresponding professor. Hence the paper will be acceptable “After Some Modifications”. |
» 猜你喜欢
求个博导看看
已经有16人回复
想换工作。大多数高校都是 评职称时 认可5年内在原单位取得的成果吗?
已经有8人回复
上海工程技术大学张培磊教授团队招收博士生
已经有4人回复
上海工程技术大学【激光智能制造】课题组招收硕士
已经有5人回复
求助院士们,这个如何合成呀
已经有4人回复
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名
已经有9人回复
需要合成515-64-0,50g,能接单的留言
已经有4人回复
自荐读博
已经有4人回复
写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文,论文内容以实验为主,投什么期刊合适?
已经有6人回复
带资进组求博导收留
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
审稿人二审意见帮我分析一下!多谢各位大牛
已经有5人回复
请各位帮忙看以下审稿意见,不知道如何修改!
已经有3人回复
帮忙看一下审稿人意见,谢谢
已经有6人回复
求高人帮忙分析下APL审稿意见
已经有7人回复
SCI审稿意见回来了,编辑给的moderate revision,麻烦大家帮分析一下,有BB
已经有28人回复
JCA审稿意见返回,编辑要求很严厉,语言的问题,想找一个公司帮忙改,大家推荐下
已经有12人回复
投稿有答复了,些许激动请大家帮忙看看,谢谢大家!(在13楼增加第二封审稿意见)
已经有32人回复
请大家帮忙分析下这句审稿意见是什么意思
已经有4人回复
请大家帮忙分析一下soft matter审稿人给的意见
已经有20人回复
专家审稿意见,请大家帮忙分析!
已经有5人回复
审稿意见回来了,看不懂是什么意思,请那位大侠帮忙翻译一下?谢谢!
已经有4人回复
ImechE Power and Energy 第二次大修,请大家帮忙分析一下怎么回复审稿人
已经有10人回复
大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见,录用几率大不?
已经有24人回复
Applied Surface Science审稿意见 帮忙分析下 谢谢
已经有11人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
导电高分子用什么工艺处理分子链的堆叠会更加规整???
+1/85
中国海洋大学与中国水产科学研究院 联合培养 专硕 食品加工与安全
+1/78
坐标上海,93年诚征女友
+1/63
加拿大卡尔加里大学 量子通信和信息方向 硕士/博士招生
+1/54
西南交通大学前沿院碳中和与物质循环利用课题组招收博士生
+1/34
上海大学 力工学院 锂电池方向 博士研究生招生
+1/29
有没有在ITO或者FTO玻璃上做好的CdS薄膜购买?
+1/27
博士招生
+1/26
山东大学集成电路学院博士招生1名
+1/12
山东大学集成电路学院招收2026年9月入学的博士研究生
+1/11
测试
+1/7
武汉大学郭宇铮教授课题组招收博士后等研究人员【先进封装/芯片/人工智能等方向】
+1/6
北京理工大学-集成电路与电子学院-国家杰青团队-招博士后及科研助理
+1/6
经济学博士(金融方向)招生,211重点大学,2026年9月入学,申请-考核制。
+1/3
论文投稿推荐
+1/2
史上最赚钱一年!今年全球最富500人财富增加2.2万亿美元
+1/2
北京师范大学与企业联合招聘博士后、全职、兼职人员
+1/1
北京师范大学与企业联合招聘博士后、全职、兼职人员
+1/1
海南大学!海洋与极地地质团队长期招收博士和博士后
+1/1
中国农业科学院棉花研究所阴祖军研究员诚招植物生物学科研助理
+1/1
Air2104(金币+5): 2011-04-11 19:52:09
|
晕,恭喜啊,这是revision修回了,让你按着审稿人的意见修改呢。按审稿人的意见修改,肯定接受的。 审稿人2的意见,你2009年后的文献太少,要加一些新文献,FIg2和文中数据不对应。图5和6也要修改下,对你the reflectance of the PANI/PE composite film under different potentials has no discrimination in the mid-IR region". 这句话也有疑问,你的解释一下。 审稿人1的意见,PES的全称,the thickness of thin film of PANI的厚度,-0.8,0.0.8的 FTIR-ATR 图谱 ,等等 最后要仔细修改语言。 所以给你了你revision,对着修改就会接受的。 |
2楼2011-04-11 19:46:39
3楼2011-04-11 19:54:52
4楼2011-04-11 19:58:43
5楼2011-04-11 19:59:15
6楼2011-04-11 20:01:56
简单回复
2011-04-11 20:49
回复
Air2104(金币+1): 2011-04-11 21:04:11







回复此楼