| 查看: 1495 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
synthetic metals 投稿,审稿意见, 请各位帮忙分析一下!
|
|||
|
最近投了一篇synthetic metals 审了4个月 要重投 各位帮忙分析一下 看需要怎么改,初次投稿,不知道怎么办!谢谢 这文章是拒了还是怎么回事?有没有中的可能性,大家帮忙分析一下,非常感谢! Ms. Ref. No.: SYNMET-D-10-00852 Title: Study of the mechanism of the variable emissivity infrared electrochromic device based on polyaniline conducting polymer Synthetic Metals Dear MR Hua Li, I have now obtained the necessary reviews for your paper. The reviewers have commented on your paper entitled 'Study of the mechanism of the variable emissivity infrared electrochromic device based on polyaniline conducting polymer'. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments when revising your manuscript. Should you choose to send a revised version of your paper, please do so within two months; otherwise, it may be considered by this office as a new submission. Also, if you are submitting a revised manuscript, please enclose the following: a) A letter fully addressing the changes you have incorporated into the revised manuscript in accordance with the referee's recommendations. b) A copy of your revised manuscript showing the changes highlighted. The highlighting can be done in bold, underlined or highlighted font. Please write "highlighted" in the top right corner of this document. c) A copy of the un-highlighted revised manuscript. To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/synmet/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] Bear in mind your revision should be submitted by May 11, 2011. Please note, the revised manuscript is also subject to additional review. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Sincerely, I. Samuel Regional Editor Synthetic Metals Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #2: This article discussed the electrochromic device caused reflectivity and emissivity change for various reasons. on the whole, I think the content of clear thinking, integrity is better. on the whole, I think the content of the article clear thinking, integrity is better. The manuscript should not be accepted at current version. 1.Why you show the reflectance curve of the device at -0.5V and 0.5V, but no 0V in Fig 2? 2.I don't think that "the reflectance of the PANI/PE composite film under different potentials has no discrimination in the mid-IR region". I think there is obvious difference between them. 3.You prove the PANI film is doping state at 0.8V by FTIR-ATR measurement with many paragraphs, it's too long. 4.If you unify the space of abscissa of Fig5 and Fig6, it will be better. 5.There is only one reference published after 2009. More recent references should be analyzed and cited. 第一个审稿人的意见如下: Comments: Authors are made device of PANI using electropolymerization technique and it is interesting work for electrochromic devices and application in IR region. 1) In Experimental, " The electropolymerization solution comprised 1M sulfuric acid and 0.5M aniline monomer Please explain more details of Experimental section and more scientifically. What is working window for PANI during deposition, scan rate, bath temperature, etc.? are they recorded CV during deposition? 2) I think authors may tried to deposit PANI in different oxidizing agents such as ammonium peroxidisulphide (APS)??? 3) What is mean by PES??? 4) Are they checked Raman of deposited PANI? If yes, please add. 5) In fig.5 FTIR-ATR spectrum of the electrochemical polymerization PANI on PES/Au substrate for which potential???? 6) What is the thickness of thin film of PANI?? 7) Please provide FTIR-ATR spectrum for -0.8V, 0V and +0.8 V. 8) At 0 V and 0.8 V, the emissivity of the device in the 8-12 μm region is almost the same and high, while the emissivity is the lowest at -0.8 V, which is consistent with the reflectance of the device. Why? 9) I am still confusing, PANI/PE composite film accord well with the reflectance and emissivity of the device. It composite or layer by layer deposition?? Moreover, the paper is poorly written and has numerous grammatical mistakes. Please check the manuscript by corresponding professor. Hence the paper will be acceptable “After Some Modifications”. |
» 猜你喜欢
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷
已经有13人回复
三甲基碘化亚砜的氧化反应
已经有4人回复
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢
已经有5人回复
请问有评职称,把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗
已经有5人回复
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果
已经有3人回复
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有4人回复
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生
已经有6人回复
AI论文写作工具:是科研加速器还是学术作弊器?
已经有3人回复
论文投稿,期刊推荐
已经有4人回复
硕士和导师闹得不愉快
已经有13人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
审稿人二审意见帮我分析一下!多谢各位大牛
已经有5人回复
请各位帮忙看以下审稿意见,不知道如何修改!
已经有3人回复
帮忙看一下审稿人意见,谢谢
已经有6人回复
求高人帮忙分析下APL审稿意见
已经有7人回复
SCI审稿意见回来了,编辑给的moderate revision,麻烦大家帮分析一下,有BB
已经有28人回复
JCA审稿意见返回,编辑要求很严厉,语言的问题,想找一个公司帮忙改,大家推荐下
已经有12人回复
投稿有答复了,些许激动请大家帮忙看看,谢谢大家!(在13楼增加第二封审稿意见)
已经有32人回复
请大家帮忙分析下这句审稿意见是什么意思
已经有4人回复
请大家帮忙分析一下soft matter审稿人给的意见
已经有20人回复
专家审稿意见,请大家帮忙分析!
已经有5人回复
审稿意见回来了,看不懂是什么意思,请那位大侠帮忙翻译一下?谢谢!
已经有4人回复
ImechE Power and Energy 第二次大修,请大家帮忙分析一下怎么回复审稿人
已经有10人回复
大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见,录用几率大不?
已经有24人回复
Applied Surface Science审稿意见 帮忙分析下 谢谢
已经有11人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
福州大学化工学院电子化学品团队博士招生
+1/128
硫化物全固态电池的产业化破局:手套箱如何实现全线稳定制造
+1/86
加拿大/英属哥伦比亚大学曹彦凯课题组招收全奖博士/博后 [机器学习/优化/控制方向]
+1/86
坐标山东东营,诚征女友
+1/78
限广州,征女友
+2/46
国家青年人才叶立群教授课题组招收2026级博士研究生
+1/35
双一流大学湘潭大学“化工过程模拟与强化”国家地方联合工程研究中心招收各类博士生
+1/34
捷克布拉格查理大学(QS260)招收第一性原理计算博士生
+1/32
华北电力大学(北京)(第一性原理计算)博士招生——学博,专博各1人
+2/24
南京大学能源与资源学院蔡亮课题组诚招博士后、助理研究员(AEM、PEM电解水制氢方向)
+1/15
【陕西师范大学】催化化学课题组2026年招收博士后/讲师/副高
+1/9
伦敦大学学院(University College London)机械工程系博士招生/CSC联培招生
+1/7
南京大学蔡亮课题组诚招2026年申请-考核制博士生2-3名(电解水制氢,XAFS谱学等)
+1/6
长江大学武汉校区诚招工程热物理、油气、电气等新能源博士-2025
+1/5
欢迎报考中山大学课题组,确保2025-2026级硕士研究生名额
+1/5
华南师大化学单颗粒活性组招聘1人-特聘副研究员/研究员
+1/4
液相方法和氨基酸分析仪有什么不一样?
+1/3
东莞理工学院-大连化物所联合招聘光催化方向博士后2名(年薪48W)
+1/3
沙特法赫德国王石油与矿产大学(KFUPM)膜分离课题组招生
+1/2
中国科学技术大学 精准智能化学重点实验室 武建昌课题组招聘博士,博士后
+1/2
6楼2011-04-11 20:01:56
Air2104(金币+5): 2011-04-11 19:52:09
|
晕,恭喜啊,这是revision修回了,让你按着审稿人的意见修改呢。按审稿人的意见修改,肯定接受的。 审稿人2的意见,你2009年后的文献太少,要加一些新文献,FIg2和文中数据不对应。图5和6也要修改下,对你the reflectance of the PANI/PE composite film under different potentials has no discrimination in the mid-IR region". 这句话也有疑问,你的解释一下。 审稿人1的意见,PES的全称,the thickness of thin film of PANI的厚度,-0.8,0.0.8的 FTIR-ATR 图谱 ,等等 最后要仔细修改语言。 所以给你了你revision,对着修改就会接受的。 |
2楼2011-04-11 19:46:39
3楼2011-04-11 19:54:52
4楼2011-04-11 19:58:43














回复此楼
好羡慕啊,祝福楼主啊