24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

Air2104

银虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 207
帖子: 49
在线: 12.8小时
虫号: 366381

[交流] synthetic metals 投稿，审稿意见，请各位帮忙分析一下！

最近投了一篇synthetic metals 审了4个月要重投
各位帮忙分析一下看需要怎么改，初次投稿，不知道怎么办！谢谢
这文章是拒了还是怎么回事？有没有中的可能性，大家帮忙分析一下，非常感谢！

Ms. Ref. No.:  SYNMET-D-10-00852
Title: Study of the mechanism of the variable emissivity infrared electrochromic device based on polyaniline conducting polymer
Synthetic Metals

Dear MR Hua Li,

I have now obtained the necessary reviews for your paper.  The reviewers have commented on your paper entitled 'Study of the mechanism of the variable emissivity infrared electrochromic device based on polyaniline conducting polymer'. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form.

However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript.

Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments when revising your manuscript. Should you choose to send a revised version of your paper, please do so within two months; otherwise, it may be considered by this office as a new submission.

Also, if you are submitting a revised manuscript, please enclose the following:

a) A letter fully addressing the changes you have incorporated into the revised manuscript in accordance with the referee's recommendations.

b) A copy of your revised manuscript showing the changes highlighted. The highlighting can be done in bold, underlined or highlighted font. Please write "highlighted" in the top right corner of this document.

c) A copy of the un-highlighted revised manuscript.

To submit your revision, please do the following:

1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/synmet/

2. Enter your login details

3. Click [Author Login]
This takes you to the Author Main Menu.

4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision]

Bear in mind your revision should be submitted by May 11, 2011.

Please note, the revised manuscript is also subject to additional review. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Sincerely,

I. Samuel
Regional Editor
Synthetic Metals

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #2: This article discussed the electrochromic device caused reflectivity and emissivity change for various reasons. on the whole, I think the content of clear thinking, integrity is better. on the whole, I think the content of the article clear thinking, integrity is better. The manuscript should not be accepted at current version.
1.Why you show the reflectance curve of the device at -0.5V and 0.5V, but no 0V in Fig 2?
2.I don't think that "the reflectance of the PANI/PE composite film under different potentials has no discrimination in the mid-IR region". I think there is obvious difference between them.
3.You prove the PANI film is doping state at 0.8V by FTIR-ATR measurement with many paragraphs, it's too long.
4.If you unify the space of abscissa of Fig5 and Fig6, it will be better.
5.There is only one reference published after 2009. More recent references should be analyzed and cited.

第一个审稿人的意见如下：
Comments:
Authors are made device of PANI using electropolymerization technique and it is interesting work for electrochromic devices and application in IR region.

1) In Experimental, " The electropolymerization solution comprised 1M sulfuric acid
         and 0.5M aniline monomer Please explain more details of Experimental section and more scientifically.
         What is working window for PANI during deposition, scan rate, bath temperature, etc.? are they recorded CV during deposition?

2) I think authors may tried to deposit PANI in different oxidizing agents such as ammonium peroxidisulphide (APS)???

3) What is mean by PES???

4) Are they checked Raman of deposited PANI? If yes, please add.

5) In fig.5 FTIR-ATR spectrum of the electrochemical polymerization PANI on PES/Au substrate for which potential????

6) What is the thickness of thin film of PANI??

7) Please provide FTIR-ATR spectrum for -0.8V, 0V and +0.8 V.

8) At 0 V and 0.8 V, the emissivity of the device in the 8-12 μm region is almost the same and high, while the emissivity is the lowest at -0.8 V, which is consistent with the reflectance of the device. Why?

9) I am still confusing, PANI/PE composite film accord well with the reflectance and emissivity of the device. It composite or layer by layer deposition??

Moreover, the paper is poorly written and has numerous grammatical mistakes. Please check the manuscript by corresponding professor. Hence the paper will be acceptable “After Some Modifications”.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

青椒八年已不青，大家都被折磨成啥样了？已经有11人回复
限项规定已经有9人回复
免疫学博士有名额，速联系已经有4人回复
交叉科学部支持青年基金，对三无青椒是个机会吗？已经有5人回复
国家基金申请书模板内插入图片不可调整大小? 已经有6人回复
国家级人才课题组招收2026年入学博士已经有5人回复
Fe3O4@SiO2合成已经有6人回复
青年基金C终止已经有4人回复
26申博求博导推荐-遥感图像处理方向已经有4人回复
西南交通大学国家级人才团队2026年博士研究生招生（考核制）—机械、材料、力学方向已经有3人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

审稿人二审意见帮我分析一下！多谢各位大牛已经有5人回复
请各位帮忙看以下审稿意见，不知道如何修改！已经有3人回复
帮忙看一下审稿人意见,谢谢已经有6人回复
求高人帮忙分析下APL审稿意见已经有7人回复
SCI审稿意见回来了，编辑给的moderate revision，麻烦大家帮分析一下，有BB 已经有28人回复
JCA审稿意见返回，编辑要求很严厉，语言的问题，想找一个公司帮忙改，大家推荐下已经有12人回复
投稿有答复了，些许激动请大家帮忙看看，谢谢大家！（在13楼增加第二封审稿意见）已经有32人回复
请大家帮忙分析下这句审稿意见是什么意思已经有4人回复
请大家帮忙分析一下soft matter审稿人给的意见已经有20人回复
专家审稿意见，请大家帮忙分析！已经有5人回复
审稿意见回来了，看不懂是什么意思，请那位大侠帮忙翻译一下？谢谢！已经有4人回复
ImechE Power and Energy 第二次大修，请大家帮忙分析一下怎么回复审稿人已经有10人回复
大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？已经有24人回复
Applied Surface Science审稿意见帮忙分析下谢谢已经有11人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2011-04-11 19:22:11

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

hua016

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 5 (幼儿园)
金币: 3133.8
帖子: 773
在线: 177.1小时
虫号: 1048601

Air2104(金币+5): 2011-04-11 19:52:09

晕，恭喜啊，这是revision修回了，让你按着审稿人的意见修改呢。按审稿人的意见修改，肯定接受的。
审稿人2的意见，你2009年后的文献太少，要加一些新文献，FIg2和文中数据不对应。图5和6也要修改下，对你the reflectance of the PANI/PE composite film under different potentials has no discrimination in the mid-IR region". 这句话也有疑问，你的解释一下。
审稿人1的意见，PES的全称，the thickness of thin film of PANI的厚度，-0.8,0.0.8的 FTIR-ATR 图谱，等等
最后要仔细修改语言。
所以给你了你revision，对着修改就会接受的。

赞一下

回复此楼

2楼2011-04-11 19:46:39

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

Air2104

银虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 207
帖子: 49
在线: 12.8小时
虫号: 366381

引用回帖:

Originally posted by hua016 at 2011-04-11 19:46:39:
晕，恭喜啊，这是revision修回了，让你按着审稿人的意见修改呢。按审稿人的意见修改，肯定接受的。
审稿人2的意见，你2009年后的文献太少，要加一些新文献，FIg2和文中数据不对应。图5和6也要修改下，对你the re ...

不是revision 修回了
这是我投稿后第一次看到对文章的意见
状态栏显示是 Revise
不知道有没有希望，着急啊！

赞一下

回复此楼

3楼2011-04-11 19:54:52

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖