| 查看: 1568 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
synthetic metals 投稿,审稿意见, 请各位帮忙分析一下!
|
|||
|
最近投了一篇synthetic metals 审了4个月 要重投 各位帮忙分析一下 看需要怎么改,初次投稿,不知道怎么办!谢谢 这文章是拒了还是怎么回事?有没有中的可能性,大家帮忙分析一下,非常感谢! Ms. Ref. No.: SYNMET-D-10-00852 Title: Study of the mechanism of the variable emissivity infrared electrochromic device based on polyaniline conducting polymer Synthetic Metals Dear MR Hua Li, I have now obtained the necessary reviews for your paper. The reviewers have commented on your paper entitled 'Study of the mechanism of the variable emissivity infrared electrochromic device based on polyaniline conducting polymer'. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments when revising your manuscript. Should you choose to send a revised version of your paper, please do so within two months; otherwise, it may be considered by this office as a new submission. Also, if you are submitting a revised manuscript, please enclose the following: a) A letter fully addressing the changes you have incorporated into the revised manuscript in accordance with the referee's recommendations. b) A copy of your revised manuscript showing the changes highlighted. The highlighting can be done in bold, underlined or highlighted font. Please write "highlighted" in the top right corner of this document. c) A copy of the un-highlighted revised manuscript. To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/synmet/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] Bear in mind your revision should be submitted by May 11, 2011. Please note, the revised manuscript is also subject to additional review. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Sincerely, I. Samuel Regional Editor Synthetic Metals Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #2: This article discussed the electrochromic device caused reflectivity and emissivity change for various reasons. on the whole, I think the content of clear thinking, integrity is better. on the whole, I think the content of the article clear thinking, integrity is better. The manuscript should not be accepted at current version. 1.Why you show the reflectance curve of the device at -0.5V and 0.5V, but no 0V in Fig 2? 2.I don't think that "the reflectance of the PANI/PE composite film under different potentials has no discrimination in the mid-IR region". I think there is obvious difference between them. 3.You prove the PANI film is doping state at 0.8V by FTIR-ATR measurement with many paragraphs, it's too long. 4.If you unify the space of abscissa of Fig5 and Fig6, it will be better. 5.There is only one reference published after 2009. More recent references should be analyzed and cited. 第一个审稿人的意见如下: Comments: Authors are made device of PANI using electropolymerization technique and it is interesting work for electrochromic devices and application in IR region. 1) In Experimental, " The electropolymerization solution comprised 1M sulfuric acid and 0.5M aniline monomer Please explain more details of Experimental section and more scientifically. What is working window for PANI during deposition, scan rate, bath temperature, etc.? are they recorded CV during deposition? 2) I think authors may tried to deposit PANI in different oxidizing agents such as ammonium peroxidisulphide (APS)??? 3) What is mean by PES??? 4) Are they checked Raman of deposited PANI? If yes, please add. 5) In fig.5 FTIR-ATR spectrum of the electrochemical polymerization PANI on PES/Au substrate for which potential???? 6) What is the thickness of thin film of PANI?? 7) Please provide FTIR-ATR spectrum for -0.8V, 0V and +0.8 V. 8) At 0 V and 0.8 V, the emissivity of the device in the 8-12 μm region is almost the same and high, while the emissivity is the lowest at -0.8 V, which is consistent with the reflectance of the device. Why? 9) I am still confusing, PANI/PE composite film accord well with the reflectance and emissivity of the device. It composite or layer by layer deposition?? Moreover, the paper is poorly written and has numerous grammatical mistakes. Please check the manuscript by corresponding professor. Hence the paper will be acceptable “After Some Modifications”. |
» 猜你喜欢
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写
已经有11人回复
救命帖
已经有5人回复
限项规定
已经有5人回复
为什么nbs上溴 没有产物点出现呢
已经有9人回复
招博士
已经有3人回复
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有35人回复
最失望的一年
已经有18人回复
求推荐博导
已经有4人回复
求推荐英文EI期刊
已经有5人回复
疑惑?
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
审稿人二审意见帮我分析一下!多谢各位大牛
已经有5人回复
请各位帮忙看以下审稿意见,不知道如何修改!
已经有3人回复
帮忙看一下审稿人意见,谢谢
已经有6人回复
求高人帮忙分析下APL审稿意见
已经有7人回复
SCI审稿意见回来了,编辑给的moderate revision,麻烦大家帮分析一下,有BB
已经有28人回复
JCA审稿意见返回,编辑要求很严厉,语言的问题,想找一个公司帮忙改,大家推荐下
已经有12人回复
投稿有答复了,些许激动请大家帮忙看看,谢谢大家!(在13楼增加第二封审稿意见)
已经有32人回复
请大家帮忙分析下这句审稿意见是什么意思
已经有4人回复
请大家帮忙分析一下soft matter审稿人给的意见
已经有20人回复
专家审稿意见,请大家帮忙分析!
已经有5人回复
审稿意见回来了,看不懂是什么意思,请那位大侠帮忙翻译一下?谢谢!
已经有4人回复
ImechE Power and Energy 第二次大修,请大家帮忙分析一下怎么回复审稿人
已经有10人回复
大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见,录用几率大不?
已经有24人回复
Applied Surface Science审稿意见 帮忙分析下 谢谢
已经有11人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
东北石油大学三亚海洋油气研究院|地学硕士|地质资源与地质工程、地质学、地质工程等
+1/176
海南大学专任教师招聘:海洋工程与海洋智能装备相关方向【长期有效】
+2/116
南方医科大学发育生物学教研室夏来新教授课题组招收26级博士研究生
+1/86
中国地质大学(武汉)地质学、地质资源与地质工程、资源与环境方向招生,请尽快联系!
+1/68
招收博士生(大连理工大学,2026.09入学)
+1/68
辽宁材料实验室框架复合材料课题组招收联合培养研究生(长期有效)
+2/68
自驾淄博回四川遂宁过年,寻找小伙伴一起
+1/66
北京理工大学 珠海校区 纳米光学 招1名博士生--申请考核制
+4/48
东北林业大学刘松教授课题组长期招收博士、博士后
+1/31
【教授本人】南佛罗里达大学化学系刘文奇课题组 2026 Fall 招收有机/超分子方向博士生
+1/27
【陕西师范大学】催化化学课题组2026年招收博士后/讲师/副高
+1/18
中科院杭州医学研究所方晓红课题组-上海交大肖泽宇课题组联合招聘博士后及科研助理
+2/10
杨亚研究员课题组(广西大学-纳米能源研究中心)招收2026年物理学专业学术型博士
+1/7
复旦大学2026年博士研究生,“药学 + 合成生物学”
+1/5
国防科大超声速燃烧课题组招收博士后
+1/5
多伦多城市大学深度学习方向博士后
+1/4
南开大学齐迹课题组诚聘分子生物学、免疫学、有机分子合成相关方向的博士后和研究生
+1/4
山东师范大学海外优青(校长团队)招聘硕士/博士/博后
+1/2
河北工业大学层状材料与器件团队诚聘二维材料与原位电子显微学方向青年教师与博士后
+1/2
标准求助 SN/T 5263-2020悬赏10个金币
+1/2
3楼2011-04-11 19:54:52
Air2104(金币+5): 2011-04-11 19:52:09
|
晕,恭喜啊,这是revision修回了,让你按着审稿人的意见修改呢。按审稿人的意见修改,肯定接受的。 审稿人2的意见,你2009年后的文献太少,要加一些新文献,FIg2和文中数据不对应。图5和6也要修改下,对你the reflectance of the PANI/PE composite film under different potentials has no discrimination in the mid-IR region". 这句话也有疑问,你的解释一下。 审稿人1的意见,PES的全称,the thickness of thin film of PANI的厚度,-0.8,0.0.8的 FTIR-ATR 图谱 ,等等 最后要仔细修改语言。 所以给你了你revision,对着修改就会接受的。 |
2楼2011-04-11 19:46:39
4楼2011-04-11 19:58:43
5楼2011-04-11 19:59:15













回复此楼