24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1612  |  回复: 10
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ztb1979

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 请大家帮分析下审稿意见已有6人参与

Engineering failure analysis 给的审稿意见,大家帮分析分析是大修还是小修,谢谢啦!
Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer #1: This paper studies the resistance of the reinforced concrete structures experimentally.   As a result, the authors propose a design procedure.   However, the proposed design curve seems to be defined as the statistical average of experimental results.   The reviewer wonders that such a design curve without any safety margins is acceptable.   The authors are expected to make some explanations about the applicability of the proposal as an design concept.   In addition, this paper has a lot of editorial mistakes.   The authors are also expected to fix them.



Reviewer #2: Clarify if the paper presents a design concept or only the experimental results after a statistical analysis. Verify and standardize the entire document including the technical English.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wdlgezi

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
从自然科学角度解释是什么和为什么,然后实验是有力的佐证。审稿人好像不清楚你的文章是否是因为实验如此所以结论如此,还是实验证明了观点的存在

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
敢问路在何方
11楼2015-01-06 14:32:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ztb1979 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见