| 查看: 4089 | 回复: 18 | |||
limh770522木虫 (职业作家)
|
[求助]
这个审稿意见是好还是坏?? 如何回答审稿人的问题等?已有3人参与
|
||
|
投了一个小杂志,整整等了半年,终于等到了编辑部的回复,内容如下,大家帮我看下,希望大不大??? 此外回答审稿人提出的问题时,如何回答? 是一问一答的形式?在上传修改稿是是不是单独创建一个word文件,对审稿人得问题进行解答??此外如何在修改的文章中体现对审稿人得回答??? 屌丝博士人生第一篇小SCI,影响因子不高, 只求毕业,最后。谢谢大家了。 Dear Mr. Li: Your manuscript entitled "*****" which you submitted to “******”, has been reviewed. The reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter. You will see that although the referees find some merit in the paper it is required that substantial revisions be done before we can consider it further. Nevertheless, we do hope that you will be able to undertake the additional work on the paper and look forward to receiving a revised manuscript in due course. When you revise your manuscript please highlight the changes you make in the manuscript by using the track changes mode in MS Word or by using bold or coloured text. To submit the revision, log into https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/lsrt and enter your Author Centre, where you will find your manuscript title listed under "Manuscripts with Decisions." Under "Actions," click on "Create a Revision." Your manuscript number has been appended to denote a revision. Please enter your responses to the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. You can use this space to document any changes you made to the original manuscript. Please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewer(s). IMPORTANT: Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript. Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission. Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic, and Nano-Metal Chemistry, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision in a reasonable amount of time, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission. Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic, and Nano-Metal Chemistry and I look forward to receiving your revision. Sincerely, Dr. Raghuraman Kannan Editor in Chief, Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic, and Nano-Metal Chemistry kannanr@health.missouri.edu, KannanR@health.missouri.edu |
» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
论文投稿交流的收集 |
» 猜你喜欢
三甲基碘化亚砜的氧化反应
已经有4人回复
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢
已经有5人回复
请问有评职称,把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗
已经有5人回复
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷
已经有12人回复
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果
已经有3人回复
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有4人回复
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生
已经有6人回复
AI论文写作工具:是科研加速器还是学术作弊器?
已经有3人回复
论文投稿,期刊推荐
已经有4人回复
硕士和导师闹得不愉快
已经有13人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
如何回应建议拒稿的审稿人呢?
已经有14人回复
审稿人让小修,但是这个意见怎么回复比较好?
已经有3人回复
这样的审稿意见算好算坏?该如何回答?
已经有18人回复
不同审稿人的审稿意见再我们回复后是否能彼此看到
已经有4人回复
文章的审稿意见回来了,觉得审稿人意见有问题,想写argue,请教怎么写argue
已经有9人回复
审稿人意见如何答复!
已经有5人回复
补充实验无法完成,如何回答审稿人的意见?
已经有11人回复
如何回复审稿人意见
已经有17人回复
主编回复小修接收,但是没有发审稿人的意见,该如何办?
已经有6人回复
审稿人的意见该怎么回复
已经有9人回复
审稿人意见如何回复
已经有15人回复
刚收到SCI期刊的审稿意见,如何回答审稿人?
已经有23人回复
审稿人的问题需要都回答吗
已经有42人回复
审稿人提的问题太大,解决不了,如何回复审稿人?
已经有11人回复
如何回复审稿人的意见
已经有7人回复
如何回答审稿人问题
已经有4人回复
想请教一下,如果你确定审稿人给的意见是他弄错了,应该怎样答复他呢?
已经有10人回复
审稿人询问试验重复次数,该如何回答?
已经有12人回复
怎么回复审稿人的意见
已经有14人回复
小修没有完全回答审稿人意见,会不会悲剧啊?
已经有21人回复
高分求助:如何给编辑写email驳斥审稿人的审稿意见
已经有8人回复
审稿人意见,实在不知道怎么回答怎么办
已经有14人回复
审稿人的问题不知道咋回答了
已经有7人回复
怎么回复审稿人?
已经有16人回复
请教如何回答这个审稿人的意见
已经有11人回复
angocn
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 206 (大学生)
- 金币: 17572.5
- 散金: 100
- 红花: 33
- 帖子: 11967
- 在线: 451.8小时
- 虫号: 2595191
- 注册: 2013-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学

3楼2014-12-31 00:19:33
zhejiang_nb
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 14 (小学生)
- 金币: 5236.2
- 散金: 2103
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 569
- 在线: 440.1小时
- 虫号: 1568497
- 注册: 2012-01-07
- 专业: 药物化学
6楼2014-12-31 09:18:32
limh770522
木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 105 (高中生)
- 金币: 2855.5
- 散金: 24
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 3651
- 在线: 275.4小时
- 虫号: 302070
- 注册: 2006-12-02
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
|
附上审稿意见,好多问题,哎~~~~ 其中最后一个审稿人的连个问题,自己不知道如何解答,郁闷啊。 30-Dec-2014 Dear Mr. Li: Your manuscript entitled "***" which you submitted to ***, has been reviewed. The reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter. You will see that although the referees find some merit in the paper it is required that substantial revisions be done before we can consider it further. Nevertheless, we do hope that you will be able to undertake the additional work on the paper and look forward to receiving a revised manuscript in due course. When you revise your manuscript please highlight the changes you make in the manuscript by using the track changes mode in MS Word or by using bold or coloured text. To submit the revision, log into https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/lsrt and enter your Author Centre, where you will find your manuscript title listed under "Manuscripts with Decisions." Under "Actions," click on "Create a Revision." Your manuscript number has been appended to denote a revision. Please enter your responses to the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. You can use this space to document any changes you made to the original manuscript. Please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewer(s). IMPORTANT: Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript. Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission. Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to ***, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision in a reasonable amount of time, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission. Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic, and Nano-Metal Chemistry and I look forward to receiving your revision. Sincerely, Dr. Raghuraman Kannan Editor in Chief, Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic, and Nano-Metal Chemistry kannanr@health.missouri.edu, KannanR@health.missouri.edu Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author A flower-like in CuS had prepared by solvothermal synthesis technique in this manuscript. The microstructure and phase composition had been detected by using XRD, SEM, HRTEM, XPS, Raman and UV and so on. The experimental results indicated that the cupric chloride and cupric nitrate in low viscosity solvent was a suitable raw material to preparing flower-like morphology of CuS. I think this manuscript should be published in this issue after major revision. 1. Due to numerous inappropriate expressions and sporadic inadequate English, authors have to revise the whole manuscript 2. Abstract section should succinct and clear to depict method, results and conclusion. Please rewrite this part. 3. Could you review solvothermal synthesis detail but not hydrothermal in INTRODUCTION? 4. It is not sure if the X-ray diffraction and SEM analyses were performed on CuS, as reported in the RESULTS section 5. Please check the caption of fig. 5 and 6. 6. Fig. 4 is blurry. 7. What’s the meaning of SAED in set of SEM images (Fig. 8). It is inapposite for insetting SAED into SEM images 8. For the optical band gap, there only one of prepared products has been calculated. It is more useful to contrast experimental procedure if you can calculate the others optical band gap. 9. Figure 10 is very typical sketch for illustrating synthesis nanomaterials. Please remove Figure 10!!! Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author This paper reports that the flower-like CuS were produced by water/ethanol solvothermal synthesis without surface active agent and template. The different morphology of CuS can be obtained by varying solvent viscosity. It should be an important work. The manuscript was well organized. However, it is noted that the manuscript needs careful emendation in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. I suggest that the work can be accepted for publication in this journal after improving the English. Reviewer: 3 Comments to the Author This manuscript reported the preparation of CuS with flower-like morphology. It is interesting as research. In order to let reader to understand it well, some experimental and explanation should added. Therefore, the paper should be modified before it is published in this Journal. 1. The CuS size should be calculated by XRD. 2. The authors should reconsider some sentence, such as “without any surface active agent (surfactants?) and template (not addition of template?)”, but in section 3.2, you wrote forming soft template, how to explain. 3. English should be improved. 4. Influence of organic solvent should be give further explanation. Only viscosity is not enough, how do you think hydrophobic and hydrophilic? 5. Please try to explain the differences in morphology obtained with different water/ethyl alcohol using rate of nucleic formation and crystal grow. |
10楼2014-12-31 10:30:37
limh770522
木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 105 (高中生)
- 金币: 2855.5
- 散金: 24
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 3651
- 在线: 275.4小时
- 虫号: 302070
- 注册: 2006-12-02
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
2楼2014-12-30 22:51:39
zhejiang_nb
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 14 (小学生)
- 金币: 5236.2
- 散金: 2103
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 569
- 在线: 440.1小时
- 虫号: 1568497
- 注册: 2012-01-07
- 专业: 药物化学
4楼2014-12-31 00:40:25
limh770522
木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 105 (高中生)
- 金币: 2855.5
- 散金: 24
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 3651
- 在线: 275.4小时
- 虫号: 302070
- 注册: 2006-12-02
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
5楼2014-12-31 01:18:02
semifinal
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 35 (小学生)
- 金币: 4924.6
- 散金: 101
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 824
- 在线: 147.5小时
- 虫号: 2684753
- 注册: 2013-09-27
- 专业: 信息处理方法与技术
7楼2014-12-31 09:22:15
limh770522
木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 105 (高中生)
- 金币: 2855.5
- 散金: 24
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 3651
- 在线: 275.4小时
- 虫号: 302070
- 注册: 2006-12-02
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
8楼2014-12-31 09:44:33
semifinal
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 35 (小学生)
- 金币: 4924.6
- 散金: 101
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 824
- 在线: 147.5小时
- 虫号: 2684753
- 注册: 2013-09-27
- 专业: 信息处理方法与技术
9楼2014-12-31 09:55:00














回复此楼