24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
南方科技大学公共卫生及应急管理学院2026级博士研究生招生报考通知(长期有效)
查看: 4089  |  回复: 18

limh770522

木虫 (职业作家)

[求助] 这个审稿意见是好还是坏?? 如何回答审稿人的问题等?已有3人参与

投了一个小杂志,整整等了半年,终于等到了编辑部的回复,内容如下,大家帮我看下,希望大不大???   此外回答审稿人提出的问题时,如何回答?  是一问一答的形式?在上传修改稿是是不是单独创建一个word文件,对审稿人得问题进行解答??此外如何在修改的文章中体现对审稿人得回答??? 屌丝博士人生第一篇小SCI,影响因子不高, 只求毕业,最后。谢谢大家了。
Dear Mr. Li:

Your manuscript entitled "*****" which you submitted to “******”, has been reviewed. The reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter.

You will see that although the referees find some merit in the paper it is required that substantial revisions be done before we can consider it further.  Nevertheless, we do hope that you will be able to undertake the additional work on the paper and look forward to receiving a revised manuscript in due course.

When you revise your manuscript please highlight the changes you make in the manuscript by using the track changes mode in MS Word or by using bold or coloured text.

To submit the revision, log into https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/lsrt and enter your Author Centre, where you will find your manuscript title listed under "Manuscripts with Decisions." Under "Actions," click on "Create a Revision." Your manuscript number has been appended to denote a revision. Please enter your responses to the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. You can use this space to document any changes you made to the original manuscript. Please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewer(s).

IMPORTANT:  Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript.  Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission.

Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic, and Nano-Metal Chemistry, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible.  If it is not possible for you to submit your revision in a reasonable
amount of time, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission.

Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic, and Nano-Metal Chemistry and I look forward to receiving your revision.

Sincerely,
Dr. Raghuraman Kannan
Editor in Chief, Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic, and Nano-Metal Chemistry
kannanr@health.missouri.edu, KannanR@health.missouri.edu
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

论文投稿交流的收集

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

angocn

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
你并没有贴出审稿人的身高意见啊?具体你应该是做什么反应,当然是根据审稿人的意见和要求来进行的。单从编辑的信件内容看,还是很有希望的,只是你必须尽快修回。
其实我喜欢历史,可是却学了理科
3楼2014-12-31 00:19:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhejiang_nb

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖


book2005593: 金币+1, 鼓励交流~ 2014-12-31 11:46:45
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by limh770522 at 2014-12-31 01:18:02
兄弟,我也是大修,三个审稿人提了快十几个问题,看完头都大了,不知道该咋回答?兄弟,不会您也是这个杂志吧,呵呵……
...

期刊不一样。按照审稿人意见认真修改,逐一详细回答,有些回答不了的问题说明理由,或者把你尝试过程展现给审稿人,她们是能感受到你的努力的。

我当时是一审小修; 返回后审稿人同意接收,编辑提出三个问题,主编给大修,我解决了其中一个问题; 二审返回后编辑还是送到原来审稿人那里三审,1周后直接接收。

所以,兄弟还是静下心好好改,会有好结果的。

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
6楼2014-12-31 09:18:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

limh770522

木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by zhejiang_nb at 2014-12-31 09:18:32
期刊不一样。按照审稿人意见认真修改,逐一详细回答,有些回答不了的问题说明理由,或者把你尝试过程展现给审稿人,她们是能感受到你的努力的。

我当时是一审小修; 返回后审稿人同意接收,编辑提出三个问题,主 ...

附上审稿意见,好多问题,哎~~~~     其中最后一个审稿人的连个问题,自己不知道如何解答,郁闷啊。

30-Dec-2014

Dear Mr. Li:

Your manuscript entitled "***" which you submitted to ***, has been reviewed. The reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter.

You will see that although the referees find some merit in the paper it is required that substantial revisions be done before we can consider it further.  Nevertheless, we do hope that you will be able to undertake the additional work on the paper and look forward to receiving a revised manuscript in due course.

When you revise your manuscript please highlight the changes you make in the manuscript by using the track changes mode in MS Word or by using bold or coloured text.

To submit the revision, log into https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/lsrt and enter your Author Centre, where you will find your manuscript title listed under "Manuscripts with Decisions." Under "Actions," click on "Create a Revision." Your manuscript number has been appended to denote a revision. Please enter your responses to the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. You can use this space to document any changes you made to the original manuscript. Please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewer(s).

IMPORTANT:  Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript.  Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission.

Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to ***, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible.  If it is not possible for you to submit your revision in a reasonable
amount of time, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission.

Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic, and Nano-Metal Chemistry and I look forward to receiving your revision.

Sincerely,
Dr. Raghuraman Kannan
Editor in Chief, Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic, and Nano-Metal Chemistry
kannanr@health.missouri.edu, KannanR@health.missouri.edu


Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
A flower-like in CuS had prepared by solvothermal synthesis technique in this manuscript. The microstructure and phase composition had been detected by using XRD, SEM, HRTEM, XPS, Raman and UV and so on. The experimental results indicated that the cupric chloride and cupric nitrate in low viscosity solvent was a suitable raw material to preparing flower-like morphology of CuS. I think this manuscript should be published in this issue after major revision.
1.        Due to numerous inappropriate expressions and sporadic inadequate English, authors have to revise the whole manuscript
2.        Abstract section should succinct and clear to depict method, results and conclusion. Please rewrite this part.
3.        Could you review solvothermal synthesis detail but not hydrothermal in INTRODUCTION?
4.        It is not sure if the X-ray diffraction and SEM analyses were performed on CuS, as reported in the RESULTS section
5.        Please check the caption of fig. 5 and 6.
6.        Fig. 4 is blurry.
7.        What’s the meaning of SAED in set of SEM images (Fig. 8). It is inapposite for insetting SAED into SEM images
8.        For the optical band gap, there only one of prepared products has been calculated. It is more useful to contrast experimental procedure if you can calculate the others optical band gap.
9.        Figure 10 is very typical sketch for illustrating synthesis nanomaterials. Please remove Figure 10!!!


Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
This paper reports that the flower-like CuS were produced by water/ethanol solvothermal synthesis without surface active agent and template. The different morphology of CuS can be obtained by varying solvent viscosity. It should be an important work. The manuscript was well organized. However, it is noted that the manuscript needs careful emendation in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. I suggest that the work can be accepted for publication in this journal after improving the English.

Reviewer: 3

Comments to the Author
This manuscript reported the preparation of CuS with flower-like morphology. It is interesting as research. In order to let reader to understand it well, some experimental and explanation should added. Therefore, the paper should be modified before it is published in this Journal.
  1. The CuS size should be calculated by XRD.
  2. The authors should reconsider some sentence, such as “without any surface active agent (surfactants?) and template (not addition of template?)”, but in section 3.2, you wrote forming soft template, how to explain.
  3. English should be improved.
  4. Influence of organic solvent should be give further explanation. Only viscosity is not enough, how do you think hydrophobic and hydrophilic?
  5. Please try to explain the differences in morphology obtained with different water/ethyl alcohol using rate of nucleic formation and crystal grow.
10楼2014-12-31 10:30:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

limh770522

木虫 (职业作家)

此外这句话"Nevertheless, we do hope that you will be able to undertake the additional work on the paper and look forward to receiving a revised manuscript in due course."  是需要在补数据么????  这段话自己不太明白,  希望大家解答疑惑
2楼2014-12-30 22:51:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhejiang_nb

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
limh770522: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2014-12-31 01:18:36
看这信,好亲切,前阵子自己也收到,文字惊人相似。当时我那文章大修,2个月后返回直接接受。
好好改,很有希望!

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
4楼2014-12-31 00:40:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

limh770522

木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by zhejiang_nb at 2014-12-31 00:40:25
看这信,好亲切,前阵子自己也收到,文字惊人相似。当时我那文章大修,2个月后返回直接接受。
好好改,很有希望!

兄弟,我也是大修,三个审稿人提了快十几个问题,看完头都大了,不知道该咋回答?兄弟,不会您也是这个杂志吧,呵呵……

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
5楼2014-12-31 01:18:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

semifinal

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
大修啊
审稿人让你补实验?按照审稿人意见逐条改就好了。
7楼2014-12-31 09:22:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

limh770522

木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by semifinal at 2014-12-31 09:22:15
大修啊
审稿人让你补实验?按照审稿人意见逐条改就好了。

那段话是还要补数据的意思么?自己都看晕了

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
8楼2014-12-31 09:44:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

semifinal

木虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
8楼: Originally posted by limh770522 at 2014-12-31 09:44:33
那段话是还要补数据的意思么?自己都看晕了
...

那额外的工作是指什么?审稿人提了相关的意见吧?
9楼2014-12-31 09:55:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 limh770522 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见