24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

easy880331

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 3 (幼儿园)
金币: 7260.5
散金: 776
红花: 10
帖子: 567
在线: 467.5小时
虫号: 1384570
注册: 2011-08-30
专业: 信息安全

[求助] 这样的审稿意见算好算坏？该如何回答？已有9人参与

The paper requires a very thorough proof-reading and editing. The quality of written English is poor throughout and causes great difficulty in reading; it descends into unreadable in several section.

Significantly, it is not entirely clear what the contribution of this paper (or its contained work) is. Clearly, effort has been devoted to experimentation work, but the notion of the proposed method seems little different to existing work in the subject, such as Kim and Kim, "Load balancing algorithm of parallel vision processing system forreal-time navigation", 2000. Admittedly, this is to a different end, but the approach seems broadly similar.
Nair et al, "The randomness in randomizedload balancing", 2001 discuss similar issues and propose a broadly similar (though admittedly, distinct!) approach.
It would be useful if the authors could properly compare and contrast with existing MEM-based approaches to load balancing and clearly identify:
a) the developments and/or differences between your work and existing work
b) difficulties faced in developing the experimental testbed, and an assessment of difficulties envisaged in transposing the experimental work to real-world situations
If it transpires that the underlying theoretical approach is little different to existing work, then focus should be moved to the developments required to move this work from theory into experimental practice.

This work seems broadly similar to existing work - in approach, if not
application.
It is very possible that the work has developed or refined it further.
However, I can find no reference or meaningful discusison to any similar
existing work, which raises my suspicions that this is little more than a representation
of existing work.
The experimentation work does appear to be novel, so I'm not necessarily
suggesting that the paper is dishonest, but that to gain credence, it is well
worth acknowledging existing MEM approaches to Load Balancing and
either explaining the implementation-specific concerns / differences /
developments, or the further research undertaken to refine and/or develop
these approaches for the target domain.
I would not consider it suitable for publication until these issues have been
addressed and until the quality of written English is vastly improved

大家帮我看看这个审稿人的审稿意见是好是坏？我改如何回复他，如何修改？第一次投稿没有经验，多谢大家了，如中散尽金币回谢！

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

垃圾破二本职称评审标准已经有19人回复
职称评审没过，求安慰已经有53人回复
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦已经有5人回复
26申博自荐已经有3人回复
A期刊撤稿已经有4人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

大家看看APS期刊的审稿回复，这算是重投吗？已经有90人回复
二区的，大修，有位审稿人怀疑数据算错了，结果还真算错了。怎么回应，求大神指点！已经有106人回复
论文大修！审稿快是好事还是坏事呀！已经有11人回复
这应该算是奇遇吧——审稿人变成了并列corresponding author。。。已经有42人回复
在审稿中，预感要中，打算撤稿，因为我校sci列表中没有。已经有8人回复
过了初审不交审稿费是不是就算自动退稿？已经有11人回复
审稿人问TEM结果与XRD计算粒径不一致如何回复已经有24人回复
计算力学学报审稿意见一个中文、一个英文，是否都可以用中文回答修改意见已经有6人回复
能发工程类计算SCI，审稿周期快，较易发表的已经有5人回复
计算化学类的SCI投稿投哪些审稿快呢？容易点的已经有8人回复
大家讨论一下审稿人几天就返回审稿意见该意见是好还是坏？？已经有8人回复
补充下审稿意见，大家看看JACS申诉胜算多大？？已经有15人回复
LINUX的数据硬盘坏了，谁有什么好软件恢复？已经有7人回复
PRB这样的审稿意见算是大修还是小修？已经有6人回复
谁贡献英文审稿意见模板一份，打算让作者小修。已经有2人回复
论文投稿不到两星期，就返回一个审稿意见，是好消息还是坏消息？已经有5人回复
求计算物理方面对于审稿人意见的回复模板，已经有21人回复

1楼 2014-06-15 11:18:03

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

zeuxisee

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 40 (小学生)
金币: 3392.5
散金: 10
红花: 5
帖子: 564
在线: 192.3小时
虫号: 839119
注册: 2009-09-03
性别: GG
专业: 金融学

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1

不太乐观，语言不够好，有的部分他看不懂，这编辑很负责，有的编辑写到这里就感谢你然后拒稿了。方法他觉得没创新，结论却和别人不同，他质疑。建议你第一件事看一下他给你的参考文献，确认你的论文在别人的基础上有创新，不是重复性工作。第二，如果有创新，要在文章中更显眼更详尽的说明。第三，如果结论不同，肯定要解释为何不同，是你错了还是别人错了，还是方法创新的结果。如果楼主能解决以上问题，再送出去做个校对，然后再发。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]

赞一下(3人)

回复此楼

2楼2014-06-15 11:30:09

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

普通回帖

easy880331

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 3 (幼儿园)
金币: 7260.5
散金: 776
红花: 10
帖子: 567
在线: 467.5小时
虫号: 1384570
注册: 2011-08-30
专业: 信息安全

引用回帖:

2楼: Originally posted by zeuxisee at 2014-06-15 11:30:09
不太乐观，语言不够好，有的部分他看不懂，这编辑很负责，有的编辑写到这里就感谢你然后拒稿了。方法他觉得没创新，结论却和别人不同，他质疑。建议你第一件事看一下他给你的参考文献，确认你的论文在别人的基础上有 ...

恩，多谢你的回答，对我很有帮助，只是时间上有点短，只给了两周的修改时间，你有推荐的润色的地方啊？

赞一下

回复此楼

3楼2014-06-15 12:24:56

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖