24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

xwp3304

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 4 (幼儿园)
金币: 785.1
帖子: 286
在线: 401.8小时
虫号: 1022833

[交流] 怎么回复审稿人？

大家有没有回复审稿人的格式呀？本人急需，希望中了论文的虫友帮帮忙呀！

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

百宝箱

找工作的那些事儿

好贴收藏

» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）

lnlzhp

» 猜你喜欢

体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低已经有15人回复
面上可以超过30页吧？已经有6人回复
网上报道青年教师午睡中猝死、熬夜猝死的越来越多，主要哪些原因引起的？已经有4人回复
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？已经有10人回复
版面费该交吗已经有12人回复
“人文社科而论，许多学术研究还没有达到民国时期的水平” 已经有5人回复
什么是人一生最重要的？已经有4人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2010-11-20 16:37:18

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

smartabc

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 3 (幼儿园)
金币: 6486.4
帖子: 932
在线: 417.5小时
虫号: 662010

★ ★
xwp3304(金币+1):谢谢参与
xj850626(金币+1):鼓励交流 2010-11-20 17:51:30
xwp3304(金币+5): 2010-11-20 19:27:57

List of Responses
Dear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:
Responds to the reviewer’s comments:
Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (??简要列出意见??)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (??简要列出意见??)Response: ××××××。。。。。。逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：We are very sorry for our negligence of ??...We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ??...It is really true as Reviewer suggested that??We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestionAs Reviewer suggested that??Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ??最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：Special thanks to you for your good comments.
Reviewer #2: 同上述
Reviewer #3: ××××××Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”2. Line 107, “……” was added 3. Line 129, “……” was deleted ×××××× We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.