24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 904  |  回复: 4
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wohenhao55

木虫 (正式写手)

将军,啊哈哈

[求助] 如何答复审稿人? 已有3人参与

各位,新年好!年底投了一篇电化学学报,审稿意见回来了,如下:

Reviewer #3. This is an interesting contribution but, I am not sure, if it fits well Electrochimica Acta. The electrochemical part, in term of electrochemical characterization is quite limited. The word "electrochemical" in the tule is misleading and it shall be replaced with "physicochemical". The authors need to clarify potential utility of their system to the electrochemcal science and technology starting from Introductioin to Conclusions.

其中“The authors need to clarify potential utility of their system to the electrochemcal science and technology starting from Introductioin to Conclusions. ”像这样通篇加内容的如何修改?没遇到这种情况,请前辈指教,谢谢。

[ Last edited by wohenhao55 on 2014-1-28 at 16:20 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

走自己的路
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wohenhao55 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见