| 查看: 2730 | 回复: 5 | |||
chaobo521银虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
本人第一篇SCI文章，求如何回复审稿人的意见 已有1人参与
|
|
本人三个月前投了一篇图像处理方面的文章，返回三个审稿人的意见，主编和副主编的意见是好好回答第三个审稿人的意见，但是本人对该审稿人的意见有些问题，拿不准该如何回答：请各位虫友赐教。第三个审稿人的意见如下： Reviewer #3: The present paper addresses a hot topic of interest in the area. The first part section the paper presents a brief and concise state of the art of the domain approached. Since this topic has been intensively studied during the last decade and a large number of papers and books have been published, this part might be extended to include the most recent research in this domain, and have to be included in Chapter +References: R.O. Preda, D.N. Vizireanu, "Blind Watermarking Capacity Analysis of MPEG2 Coded Video", IEEE TELSIKS 2007, 8th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services, 26-28 Sept. 2007, Nis, Serbia and Montenegro, p. 465-468. D.N. VIZIREANU, R.O Preda, BD Milovanovic, "A New Digital Watermarking scheme for Image Copyright Protection using Wavelet Packets", IEEE TELSIKS 2005, 7th Intern. Conf. on Telecomm. in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services, 28-30 September 2005, Nis, Serbia and Montenegro, p. 518-521. Some interesting papers have been published recently in CS&SP and have to be included in Chapter 1 +References. The authors contribution is not clearly underlined. Moreover, the performance design criteria are not addressed in the simulation part. The simulation results presented are sometimes uncler. The abbreviations presented in figures are not clear and should be explained in more detail. The results should be more emphasized and the conclusion chapter should be extended. The results should be also compared with other existing work from the literature. As a conclusion, the paper presents a high potential and should be accepted only if several and minor changes are made by the authors. The list of references should be extended to include recent papers, results of relevant research projects, part of them published recently in journal. The theoretical contribution should be clearly emphasized, and compared with existing literature. The theoretical part that is not connected directly with the simulation performed and brings no novelty in the domain should be removed. The results should be better explained and their relevance must be commented. The results should be checked for compliance with other papers from literature. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
生物学303求调剂，一志愿华中农微生物，六级已过，有科研有文章，党员
已经有4人回复
-
318求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
0703调剂
已经有11人回复
-
化学357分，考研调剂
已经有10人回复
-
0854求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
272求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
调剂求助
已经有13人回复
-
332求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
341求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
一志愿电子科技大学085600材料与化工 329分求调剂
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 如何回复审稿人意见
已经有17人回复
- 刚收到SCI期刊的审稿意见，如何回答审稿人？
已经有23人回复
- sci如何回复审稿意见，尤其是改格式的审稿意见？
已经有8人回复
- 怎样恢复审稿人意见
已经有4人回复
- 如何回复审稿人的意见
已经有7人回复
- 如何回复审稿人意见
已经有7人回复
- 投SCI外刊，如何回复审稿意见，谢谢！！！
已经有6人回复
- [求助] sci论文revise, 其中一个拒稿的审稿人意见该如何回复？
已经有14人回复
- 审稿意见如何回复，求助
已经有4人回复
- 大修之后还会送原来的审稿人吗？
已经有12人回复
- 论文大修，重金求助，如何回复审稿人意见
已经有14人回复
- RSC的杂志，拒稿重投（reject and resubmssion）还需要回复审稿人意见吗？
已经有6人回复
- SCI审稿人不审稿，给出不匹配审稿意（研究内容与他冲突）
已经有29人回复
- 初投SCI，如何推荐合适的审稿人？
已经有7人回复
- 求计算物理方面 对于审稿人意见的回复模板，
已经有21人回复
- SCI投稿审稿人意见是这样的怎么回复？
已经有9人回复
- 求答复审稿人的模板
已经有10人回复
- SCI文章审稿人意见回来，却不知如何答复，请各位前辈指点
已经有7人回复
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
2楼2013-05-20 16:14:41
chaobo521
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 169
- 帖子: 93
- 在线: 81.2小时
- 虫号: 834669
- 注册: 2009-08-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 信号理论与信号处理
3楼2013-05-20 17:42:20
4楼2013-05-20 21:53:43
zhoupeng87
版主 (文学泰斗)
- 应助: 6148 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 8.516
- 金币: 47410.3
- 散金: 58001
- 红花: 566
- 沙发: 2391
- 帖子: 64964
- 在线: 9636.5小时
- 虫号: 962700
- 注册: 2010-03-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机材料化学
- 管辖: 精细化工
5楼2013-05-21 16:31:51
6楼2014-05-09 21:29:39
10