24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2370  |  回复: 5
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者chaobo521将赠送您 1 个金币

chaobo521

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 本人第一篇SCI文章,求如何回复审稿人的意见已有1人参与

本人三个月前投了一篇图像处理方面的文章,返回三个审稿人的意见,主编和副主编的意见是好好回答第三个审稿人的意见,但是本人对该审稿人的意见有些问题,拿不准该如何回答:请各位虫友赐教。第三个审稿人的意见如下:
Reviewer #3: The present paper addresses a hot topic of interest in the area.
The first part section the paper presents a brief and concise state of the art of the domain approached. Since this topic has been intensively studied during the last decade and a large number of papers and books have been published, this part might be extended to include the most recent research in this domain, and have to be included in Chapter +References:
R.O. Preda, D.N. Vizireanu, "Blind Watermarking Capacity Analysis of MPEG2 Coded Video", IEEE TELSIKS 2007, 8th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services, 26-28 Sept. 2007, Nis, Serbia and Montenegro, p. 465-468.
D.N. VIZIREANU, R.O Preda, BD Milovanovic, "A New Digital Watermarking scheme for Image Copyright Protection using Wavelet Packets", IEEE TELSIKS 2005, 7th Intern. Conf. on Telecomm. in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services, 28-30 September 2005, Nis, Serbia and Montenegro, p. 518-521.
Some interesting papers have been published recently in CS&SP and have to be included in Chapter 1 +References.
The authors contribution is not clearly underlined. Moreover, the performance design criteria are not addressed in the simulation part.
The simulation results presented are sometimes uncler.
The abbreviations presented in figures are not clear and should be explained in more detail. The results should be more emphasized and the conclusion chapter should be extended.
The results should be also compared with other existing work from the literature.
As a conclusion, the paper presents a high potential and should be accepted only if several and minor changes are made by the authors.
The list of references should be extended to include recent papers, results of relevant research projects, part of them published recently in journal.
The theoretical contribution should be clearly emphasized, and compared with existing literature. The theoretical part that is not connected directly with the simulation performed and brings no novelty in the domain should be removed.
The results should be better explained and their relevance must be commented.
The results should be checked for compliance with other papers from literature.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
chaobo521: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2013-05-20 17:43:02
这些要求都不难理解吧。逐条修改并说明如何修改的即可。
例如:
你的文献引用不够充分,那么就按建议的去增加一些文献,并回复增加了哪些文献。
The authors contribution is not clearly underlined. 你的论文的贡献说明得不够清楚,需要更为清晰的说明。
等等。。。。
2楼2013-05-20 16:14:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chaobo521

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by nono2009 at 2013-05-20 16:14:41
这些要求都不难理解吧。逐条修改并说明如何修改的即可。
例如:
你的文献引用不够充分,那么就按建议的去增加一些文献,并回复增加了哪些文献。
The authors contribution is not clearly underlined. 你的论文的 ...

谢谢回复,我主要是不知道该采用什么样的表述方式回答审稿人的意见。比如,他说我采用的评价准则应该在仿真实验部分进行说明,但是我论文中已经将相应的准则方程给出了啊
3楼2013-05-20 17:42:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mxqiu

铜虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
R.O. Preda 很可能就是这个人审的!!!按照他的意思好好改就行了,最好不要跟他顶。祝好运!!
4楼2013-05-20 21:53:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhoupeng87

版主 (文学泰斗)

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
那你就按照他的要求加些文献吧
5楼2013-05-21 16:31:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

夜风knight

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

你的第一部分 引文多用点最新的文章,貌似你的引文内容有些陈旧啦
责任坚守宽容
6楼2014-05-09 21:29:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 chaobo521 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[教师之家] 统计一下:硕士毕业答辩后的谢师宴是学生出钱,还是老师出钱? +15 苏东坡二世 2024-06-02 16/800 2024-06-02 16:38 by 路上的路
[基金申请] 为什么美国要封锁华为而不封锁丘C同呢? +6 zju2000 2024-06-02 7/350 2024-06-02 16:12 by sxjc500
[硕博家园] 讨厌酒桌文化 +7 hahamyid 2024-05-31 7/350 2024-06-02 10:01 by 御龙老大
[基金申请] 离职后国自然项目不能变更单位,在新单位还能申请新的国自然项目吗 5+3 宜兰 2024-05-31 9/450 2024-06-02 09:42 by Xiaolin81
[教师之家] 博士高校求职 安建大vs西科大 +4 chengmy19 2024-06-01 10/500 2024-06-02 06:54 by icm639
[硕博家园] 每到中夜,情难自抑 +34 sioc-sunj 2024-05-28 58/2900 2024-06-02 02:53 by csyky2007
[硕博家园] 实验室太吵闹,无法安静学习,怎么办? +7 utahh 2024-05-31 12/600 2024-06-02 01:23 by dking22
[考研] 研0二导师分到新来的博士后靠谱吗 +7 sone9 2024-05-31 7/350 2024-06-01 19:10 by 梦燕园
[考博] 24年博士招生 +8 abinit432 2024-05-27 10/500 2024-06-01 17:38 by czp97
[考博] 24or25材料专业申博 +4 农夫三拳有点痛 2024-05-30 11/550 2024-06-01 14:45 by Napoleonsky
[基金申请] 博后特别资助状态变化 +24 随梦而飞2017 2024-05-30 35/1750 2024-06-01 10:10 by 青岛阳仔
[考博] 申博求助?本硕双非一篇三区和四区去985工科非天坑专业有没有希望? +4 LYS1200 2024-05-29 6/300 2024-06-01 08:50 by 学术渣渣神
[硕博家园] 哈工大硕博招生!博士每月入学! +4 nailooo 2024-05-30 5/250 2024-06-01 06:47 by anevay
[考博] 广东以理材料系碳点与功能材料课题组 — 2博士名额 / 科研助理 +4 小城夜很美 2024-05-27 11/550 2024-05-31 21:26 by 小城夜很美
[硕博家园] 求问endnote上Wiley引用格式在哪下载 +3 Elon. 2024-05-30 3/150 2024-05-31 10:13 by crazy peng
[硕博家园] 又想换工作 +15 brightmj 2024-05-27 20/1000 2024-05-29 23:25 by zyqchem
[基金申请] 信息学部函评结束了吗? +6 ducan21 2024-05-28 7/350 2024-05-29 12:10 by WORLD0256
[论文投稿] EI学报,一审返修后,为啥不再送审,直接终审中? +4 qweasd12345 2024-05-27 6/300 2024-05-29 00:02 by dut_ameng
[论文投稿] EI期刊审稿人邮箱问题 5+3 shier妈妈 2024-05-27 4/200 2024-05-28 14:53 by topedit
[硕博家园] 我是很理想化一人 +6 hahamyid 2024-05-26 6/300 2024-05-27 18:13 by 大飞鱼鱼鱼
信息提示
请填处理意见