应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 请大家帮忙分析一下审稿意见！
51/1返回列表
查看: 1317  |  回复: 6
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

yct200703

金虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 请大家帮忙分析一下审稿意见！

Dear Prof.  Wang,

Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received.  You will see that they are advising against publication of your work.  Therefore I must reject it.

For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.

Yours sincerely,

Hikaru Kobayashi, Doctor of Science
Editor

Reviewers' comments:
The manuscript reports short circuit current and energy conversion efficiency enhancements . The results are interpreted in term of enhanced absorption cross section from Au nanoparticles resulting in enhanced photogeneration of electron-hole pairs in semiconductor. The work may be interesting, but it is not suitable for publication in the present form. The following questions must be addressed before it can be further considered:

(1)        It is well known that surface plasmon resonances depend strongly on the size, shape, and volume fractions of metal nanoparticles.
(2)        External quantum efficiency (EQE or IPCE) is not presented. This is the most important characterization method for the discussion of any enhanced photocurrent, particularly, if the enhanced photocurrent is surface plasmon resonances-dependent. Therefore individual EQE curves are needed.

(3)        Placing nanoparticles in the front surface of solar cell could cause light shading effect or short wavelength destructive interference issue (different theories give different interpretation). The authors need to comment why these are not happen on their solar cell.

(4)        The results do not support authors'conclusions. Authors' statement on enhanced photogeneration of electron-hole pairs in semiconductor as a cause of short circuit current (Jsc) increase is based on a speculation. To claim such a conclusion, authors must present experimental evidence that the absorption coefficients of solar cell are indeed increased.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
付出总有回报
1楼2013-11-28 19:48:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangslafd

铜虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
改杂志吧，这个貌似没戏了，除非你还有大量的时间补充实验数据
赞一下 回复此楼
Life is hard: if it wasn’t, we would all be perfect people living in a perfect world.
6楼2013-11-29 10:15:57
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 7 个回答

summerbear

木虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
审稿人所提的问题除第一个外都是实验的设计和细节问题，恐怕要补充实验数据才行。
可以按照审稿人的建议去修改，然后再重投。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
2楼2013-11-28 20:06:16
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mjt2007

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
看来文章中有些问题没有说清楚，不能让审稿人信服。建议吸取有用信息，大修一次，再改投或重投。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
Theworldisnotinyourbooksandmaps,itisoutthere.
3楼2013-11-28 20:32:33
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zh10246

铁杆木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
看看能不能回答评审人的问题，如果能，回答好了重投，希望很大；
如果不能，如果觉着评审人的问题很重要，能回答部分，修改后投别的期刊
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
4楼2013-11-28 20:36:06
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 7 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭