24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 5352  |  回复: 45

chanboni

新虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 文章被拒了,两个审稿人意见完全相反,值得申诉么?

文章被拒了,一个审稿人认为目前的工作是别人之前工作的延伸,缺乏足够新意,另外一个审稿人说不用修改,可以发表,编辑说稿件太多就拒了。值得申诉么?
以下是编辑的拒稿的信和审稿人意见
Dear XXXX

Thank you for your submission of XXXX and for the above-mentioned Communication. We are unfortunately unable to accept your manuscript for publication in CHEMISTRY - A EUROPEAN JOURNAL.

Since considerably more Communications are received than we can possibly publish in the limited available space, a selection process has to be applied. In the course of this an article is first assessed whether it fits into the journal猀 program, whether it is likely to attract the attention of a wider readership, and whether its scientific quality is very high. In view of the fact that we can only accept the upper 40% of papers submitted we return all manuscripts to the authors immediately once we receive an outspoken negative report, particularly when the initial editorial assessment considered the content of the paper to be more suitable for a specialized journal.

We are sorry to have to disappoint you but trust that you will understand our decision based on this policy. This fast reaction should allow to submit your manuscript as early as possible to another journal. Please note that one should only appeal against such decisions when a great factual error in the referee report seems to be the basis for the decision. An appeal will not be considered if it is "only" a difference of opinion.

Sincerely yours,


Dr. Lobat Doostdar
Associate Editor


____________________________

Referee 1:

Importance: C) less important

Hypotheses Yes/No: Yes

Appropriate Length: Yes

Different Journal: Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry

Recommend Acceptance: D) No *)

Referee Letter: The manuscript describes a XXXX based fluorescent probe for XXX. The work is an extension of Prof. XXX work (ref. 8). In this study, they studied XXX dyes that emit at longer wavelengths. The XXX derivatives are also based on known dyes. Although they emit at 620-643 nm, a NIR probe emitting at longer wavelength (~800 nm) is already reported by Prof. XXXX Neither useful information nor novel concept is provided in this work. Therefore, I do not recommend its publication in this journal.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Referee 2:

This is a clean report that describes a red-shifted XXX fluorescent probe for XXX detection. The wavelength of excitation is useful for common 594 nm laser lines, and appropriate spectroscopic and cell imaging controls have been performed. I recommend publication without change to the science, only that one other relevant review on XXX probes be cited in the introduction  that covers some aspects of the XXXX

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


+++++++++++++
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘贴专辑推荐

论文发表

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
没必要申述,修改后另投吧
2楼2012-12-11 19:35:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

fzg66666

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
改投吧,申述得充分的理由,那才是体现水平的时候,要是水平够,可以试试
3楼2012-12-11 19:52:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chanboni

新虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by fzg66666 at 2012-12-11 19:52:33
改投吧,申述得充分的理由,那才是体现水平的时候,要是水平够,可以试试

这种情况编辑应该找第三个人来审稿呀,怎么直接给拒了,
4楼2012-12-11 20:12:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gadfly7

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
建议申诉一下,同时另投
5楼2012-12-11 20:14:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nuaawq

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
楼主还是改投吧  祝福楼主啊。。。。
6楼2012-12-11 20:25:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tyzhang01

金虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
另外投一个杂志吧,人为因素不可抗拒啊。。
7楼2012-12-11 20:30:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zuozhijun5134

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
如果你觉得你的文章可以
还是可以申述的,毕竟两个人意见截然相反,可以找仲裁的
祝福楼主
8楼2012-12-11 21:20:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

googleuboy

木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
esub: 金币+2, 鼓励认真应助 2012-12-12 09:26:30
有没有必要申诉你自己可以考虑一下,你觉得你的工作是不是别人之前的延伸?如果回答是,你就另投它刊吧,因为主编也是这样认为的。另外一个审稿人说不用修改,可以发表,个人觉得,这样的评论也许没不能真正反映你文章的水平,因为真正好的不用做任何修改就接受的文章实在是太少太少了,大概1%左右吧,除非你自己也觉得你的文章就属于这1%,否则你也没必要申诉了,因为主编对reviewer 2的评论不完全赞成才导致他做了据搞的决定。所以你自己可以考虑考虑,有没有必要去申诉的。
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
9楼2012-12-11 21:30:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

F_Shaw

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
如果是我,我会直接改投,强扭的瓜不甜。
Paper,paper,paper!
10楼2012-12-11 21:32:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 chanboni 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[教师之家] 省自然限项 +6 Yyds55 2024-07-12 9/450 2024-07-12 20:29 by Yyds55
[基金申请] 今年数理学部多少分才能上会? +12 chenwenqnig 2024-07-11 16/800 2024-07-12 19:03 by kobe0107
[基金申请] 2024国家社科评审交流帖 +15 zyl_001 2024-07-07 28/1400 2024-07-12 18:56 by zyl_001
[硕博家园] 超疏水表面测接触角的时候水滴滴不下去怎么办? +7 栀子生椰 2024-07-11 7/350 2024-07-12 17:25 by 知文达礼的狗头
[基金申请] 怀孕生子会提高基金命中率的50%以上 +20 dream200606 2024-07-09 22/1100 2024-07-12 14:26 by cqupenghao
[基金申请] 每日祈福 +7 maicaokouzi 2024-07-09 7/350 2024-07-12 14:10 by chuyan5156
[论文投稿] 论文返修后快两个月没有消息 5+6 yaya_313 2024-07-08 7/350 2024-07-12 14:06 by mozhisha3344
[基金申请] 先开贴,今年数理口需要什么样的涵评分数以及文章才能上会? +14 北尘心 2024-07-09 27/1350 2024-07-12 12:18 by kaoyan250
[高分子] 对苯二甲酸的酯化问题 20+3 hp0228 2024-07-08 10/500 2024-07-12 11:24 by hp0228
[有机交流] (求助)巴豆醇的合成 +3 vutzisen 2024-07-11 4/200 2024-07-11 20:37 by czyzsu
[基金申请] 信息口会评 +4 豆小河 2024-07-10 4/200 2024-07-11 19:17 by THK1912
[基金申请] 2024生命口会评日期火热出炉 +16 dream200606 2024-07-09 20/1000 2024-07-11 15:19 by Pickfoot
[基金申请] 万人青拔每个方向都发通知了吗? +5 love394 2024-07-08 5/250 2024-07-11 14:17 by LifePursuit
[基金申请] 国青必中 +3 麻雀虽小83 2024-07-09 4/200 2024-07-11 10:48 by 172132014
[基金申请] 数理,有人有消息吗? +7 lihy 2024-07-10 9/450 2024-07-11 10:17 by 6543yes
[论文投稿] 求大家帮忙看一下,主编是什么意思,是修改还是拒稿 5+9 Omnissiah 2024-07-09 26/1300 2024-07-11 08:04 by bobvan
[硕博家园] 老板叫硕博生写本子写项目书是普遍现象吗 +13 热忱12 2024-07-06 13/650 2024-07-11 08:02 by 投必得科研顾问
[找工作] offer求比较 +9 yychemyy 2024-07-07 10/500 2024-07-10 23:54 by nrzxcvb
[基金申请] 本子第二年有可能送到同一个专家手中吗 +17 baodingmu 2024-07-06 18/900 2024-07-09 14:08 by oooooo?o
[基金申请] 基金委管理科学部什么时间会评 +8 doudouzu 2024-07-06 8/400 2024-07-08 12:28 by 虾虾科科
信息提示
请填处理意见