24小时热门版块排行榜    

Znn3bq.jpeg
查看: 2829  |  回复: 15
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

botar

木虫 (正式写手)


[交流] 第一篇投稿被拒,帮我看看审稿人的意见,是否可以采纳,修改重投

个人感觉,第一个审稿人,态度不太认真,站在拒稿的角度上审稿。第二个意见较具体,相对客观一些。请大家帮我看看,给点指导意见。谢了先。
Comments for the Author:




Reviewer #1:

1.The disign of experiments in this paper lacks scientific approach. The results cannot give good reference value for extensive use.

2.The related works should be well documented.

3.Is the water-dipping process more effective than conventional approaches?The research does not provide clear conclusions. According to the author's ideas(shorten the solidification time in lower region),the air-cooled method may be better (safe and easy operation).

4.The sections of principles of numerical simulation of casting solidification are well documented in many books and papers. I recommend the deletion of that.
  


Reviewer #2:

1) The article should be modified, 1) English, 2) technology term, 3) The text should be clear & systemmatic,
Example:
a)"..The shell mold contained the following types of substrates: face coats,
intermediate coats, and backup coats. Each coat was made of two layers: a slurry layer and a stucco layer. In this study, the shell mold was made of zircon and fused silica materials, and the thickness of shell mold approximately is 8 mm" , this is previously known!
b) Abstrat: No focus.
c) The case of molding should be clear as a contribution, Re-design molding.
d) "2.1 Governing equations in numerical simulation" should be strengthed & verified according to data, discussion....
e) The case size of simulation molding can be clearly explained and discussed.

2) The key parameters of the water-dipping process is old technology. Both FEM code and ProCAST are commercialized software, and they have already been used in foundry industry for many year.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

71429

木虫 (著名写手)



botar(金币+1):谢谢参与
似乎第一个审稿人对文献中未引其论文有些不满,只是没有明说。
8楼2012-02-21 09:19:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 16 个回答

botar(金币+1):谢谢参与
The related works should be well documented
2楼2012-02-20 23:39:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

botar

木虫 (正式写手)


引用回帖:
: Originally posted by leimiao_hit at 2012-02-20 23:39:53:
The related works should be well documented

谢谢,该意思是否说明文章需要更多的实验来证明。
3楼2012-02-21 00:27:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)



botar(金币+1):谢谢参与
当然可以修改重投了,不过要认真修改,最好增加内容及讨论。
4楼2012-02-21 00:29:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
wjchen5楼
2012-02-21 00:41   回复  
botar(金币+1):谢谢参与
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 0703调剂 +17 拾玖壹 2026-04-04 19/950 2026-04-09 09:18 by may_新宇
[考研] 085404,334分,求调剂 +5 sunjie8888 2026-04-08 8/400 2026-04-09 07:26 by sunjie8888
[考研] 265求调剂 +3 风说她早忘了 2026-04-07 3/150 2026-04-08 20:20 by 逆水乘风
[考研] 一志愿南昌大学,085600,344分求调剂 +11 调剂上岸玘 2026-04-05 12/600 2026-04-08 16:17 by luoyongfeng
[考博] 申博 +8 IQwQl 2026-04-04 8/400 2026-04-08 09:43 by 0608104024
[考研] 11408 325分 +3 jgtxuxgkx 2026-04-07 3/150 2026-04-07 23:10 by lbsjt
[考研] 材料调剂 +13 汉123456 2026-04-07 14/700 2026-04-07 22:53 by 来看流星雨10
[考研] 作栽330调剂 +3 我要上好学 2026-04-02 4/200 2026-04-07 19:54 by biomichael
[考研] 306求调剂 +3 15287505595 2026-04-03 3/150 2026-04-07 18:08 by 蓝云思雨
[考研] 287求调剂 +3 通信学硕081000 2026-04-03 4/200 2026-04-06 21:03 by going home
[考研] 一志愿北交大材料工程总分358求调剂 +10 cs0106 2026-04-05 12/600 2026-04-06 19:41 by 无际的草原
[考研] 求调剂,一志愿郑州大学材料与化工专硕,英二数二342分,求老师收留 +19 v12abo 2026-04-02 21/1050 2026-04-06 09:29 by 蓝云思雨
[考研] 求调剂 +7 张.1 2026-04-05 7/350 2026-04-05 20:40 by 啵啵啵0119
[考研] 322求调剂 +3 嗯哼哼恒 2026-04-05 3/150 2026-04-05 19:52 by nepu_uu
[考研] 26考研调剂0710 0860 +9 补补不补 2026-04-03 14/700 2026-04-04 23:32 by 果冻大王
[考研] 278求调剂 +14 范婷娜 2026-04-04 15/750 2026-04-04 22:15 by lqwchd
[考研] 278求调剂 +3 依旧! 2026-04-02 4/200 2026-04-04 20:27 by 蓝云思雨
[考研] 306求调剂 +3 hyb上名工 2026-04-02 3/150 2026-04-04 18:12 by 热情沙漠
[考研] 322求调剂 +4 FZAC123 2026-04-03 4/200 2026-04-03 20:55 by zhq0425
[考研] 考研调剂 +3 李木子0120 2026-04-02 5/250 2026-04-02 21:45 by dongzh2009
信息提示
请填处理意见