应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 交流 » 第一篇投稿被拒，帮我看看审稿人的意见，是否可以采纳，修改重投
51/1返回列表
查看: 2539  |  回复: 15
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

botar

木虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 第一篇投稿被拒，帮我看看审稿人的意见，是否可以采纳，修改重投

个人感觉，第一个审稿人，态度不太认真，站在拒稿的角度上审稿。第二个意见较具体，相对客观一些。请大家帮我看看，给点指导意见。谢了先。
Comments for the Author:




Reviewer #1:

1.The disign of experiments in this paper lacks scientific approach. The results cannot give good reference value for extensive use.

2.The related works should be well documented.

3.Is the water-dipping process more effective than conventional approaches?The research does not provide clear conclusions. According to the author's ideas(shorten the solidification time in lower region),the air-cooled method may be better (safe and easy operation).

4.The sections of principles of numerical simulation of casting solidification are well documented in many books and papers. I recommend the deletion of that.
  


Reviewer #2:

1) The article should be modified, 1) English, 2) technology term, 3) The text should be clear & systemmatic,
Example:
a)"..The shell mold contained the following types of substrates: face coats,
intermediate coats, and backup coats. Each coat was made of two layers: a slurry layer and a stucco layer. In this study, the shell mold was made of zircon and fused silica materials, and the thickness of shell mold approximately is 8 mm" , this is previously known!
b) Abstrat: No focus.
c) The case of molding should be clear as a contribution, Re-design molding.
d) "2.1 Governing equations in numerical simulation" should be strengthed & verified according to data, discussion....
e) The case size of simulation molding can be clearly explained and discussed.

2) The key parameters of the water-dipping process is old technology. Both FEM code and ProCAST are commercialized software, and they have already been used in foundry industry for many year.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼 2012-02-20 23:03:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

botar

木虫 (正式写手)
引用回帖:
楼: Originally posted by 71429 at 2012-02-21 09:19:34:
似乎第一个审稿人对文献中未引其论文有些不满，只是没有明说。

好像是的，我也有此体会。
赞一下 回复此楼
15楼2012-02-21 22:30:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 16 个回答

leimiao_hit

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
★
botar(金币+1):谢谢参与
The related works should be well documented
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2012-02-20 23:39:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

botar

木虫 (正式写手)
引用回帖:
楼: Originally posted by leimiao_hit at 2012-02-20 23:39:53:
The related works should be well documented

谢谢，该意思是否说明文章需要更多的实验来证明。
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2012-02-21 00:27:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
★
botar(金币+1):谢谢参与
当然可以修改重投了，不过要认真修改，最好增加内容及讨论。
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2012-02-21 00:29:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
wjchen5楼
2012-02-21 00:41   回复  
botar(金币+1):谢谢参与
查看全部 16 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭