应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 交流 » 大修，帮忙看看审稿意见啊
51/1返回列表
查看: 1759  |  回复: 16
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

bear1984

木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 大修，帮忙看看审稿意见啊

Dear XX:
The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form.
However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript.
Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments.

Reviewer #1: This paper discuss flexible job-shop scheduling problem with random machine breakdowns, and a knowledge-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (KBMOEA) was developed to deal with the probelem. The authers proposed a knowledge-based heuristic searching architecture and NSGA-II was employed to perform the searching task. In the experimental results, the algorithm was compared with many well-known heuristics and performed better than other methods. But the results didn't present the convergency and the computing time of this algorithm compare with other methods. In addition, the contribution of the paper should be explained early in the paper.

This paper focuses on robust solutions to the flexible job shop scheduling problem with random machine breakdowns. Two surrogate measures are proposed to describe the level of robustness for a given schedule. A bi-objective optimization problem is constructed by incorporating makespan and robustness, and then a knowledge-based MOEA is applied to solve the problem. Computational results show that the proposed surrogate measures are effective.
>
> The topic of the paper is interesting, but an extensive revision is needed to make it publishable.
然后下面列了很多意见。。。。

应该属于大修啊，我投的是一个A类杂志的special issue, 大家帮忙看看，有希望不啊？

[ Last edited by bear1984 on 2012-2-5 at 15:08 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼2012-02-05 15:02:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

szr13132009

新虫 (正式写手)
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by bear1984 at 2012-02-05 15:10:56
嗯，谢谢前辈指点啊，主要我觉得编辑说not acceptable for publication，觉得很吓人啊。

是要好好改啊，而且现在编辑让我给审同一个special issue的稿件，也的好好审啊，给编辑留下好印象...

请问lz，是不是有些特刊会让作者审投相同特刊的其他作者的论文啊？这样不会形成竞争关系吗？
赞一下 回复此楼
16楼2012-12-04 20:54:08
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 17 个回答

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)
★
bear1984(金币+1):谢谢参与
bear1984(金币+2): 2012-02-05 15:34:18
给修改就有希望，好好修改
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
2楼2012-02-05 15:07:48
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
★
bear1984(金币+1):谢谢参与
bear1984(金币+5): 2012-02-05 15:34:50
“有希望不啊？”
这样的问题没有什么意义，任何情况都有希望，包括被拒重投的。要看如何修改了。

当然，special issue这样说，就是几乎接收了。special issue需要一定数量的文章。。。不过，即使小修，也不能大意，要认真修改。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
3楼2012-02-05 15:08:07
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bear1984

木虫 (著名写手)
引用回帖:
楼: Originally posted by visitor958 at 2012-02-05 15:08:07:
“有希望不啊？”
这样的问题没有什么意义，任何情况都有希望，包括被拒重投的。要看如何修改了。

当然，special issue这样说，就是几乎接收了。special issue需要一定数量的文章。。。不过，即使小修，也不能 ...

嗯，谢谢前辈指点啊，主要我觉得编辑说not acceptable for publication，觉得很吓人啊。

是要好好改啊，而且现在编辑让我给审同一个special issue的稿件，也的好好审啊，给编辑留下好印象
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2012-02-05 15:10:56
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 17 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭