应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 文章终审被拒了，申诉还是改投？有机会吗？
71/1返回列表
查看: 1584  |  回复: 6
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

chenenslogan

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 文章终审被拒了，申诉还是改投？有机会吗？已有4人参与

心情比较低落，之前中过一篇这个杂志，后来又投了一篇，审了2个月，没有修改（错误确实很少，2个审稿人意见都这样），最后with editor 2个月，今天收到主编final decision。2个审稿人意见差别很大，关键在于结果的新异性上。。大家看看主编的回信：
Dear Mr. x,
Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. Although the revievers' opinions were split, I regret to inform you that the final advice is against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it.
The reviewers' comments can be found at the end of this email or can be accessed by following the provided link.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. I do hope we would be able to render more positive decisions on your eventual future submissions.
Yours sincerely
2个审稿人意见：
Reviewer #1: The manuscript describes identification and cloning of lotus expansin gene, phylogenic analysis as well as expression pattern of identified expansin gene during lotus development. The study was well planed, all the procedures and obtained results were detailed described. Unfortunately, expansin genes have been already characterized in various plant species and the results provided by Authors do not bring significant information in the field. In my opinion there is lack of functional analysis e.g. on protein level. Therefore I can not recommend the manuscript for publication in
Reviewer #2
The manuscript addresses important aspect of expansin genes in lotus. It was found well-prepared and presented. Very minor suggestions:
1. Line 55; the reference regarding lotus production is old (2004). Please give recent information.
2. Figure 2. No need to show bootstrap values lower than 50%.
3. Legend to Fig. 2: replace “using” with “in” in first line (No. 171). Delete “and the option of p-distance” in line 172. Add after branches. “The evolutionary distances were computed using method of p-distance”.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
everythinghappensforthebest
1楼2015-05-19 00:27:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

szp123456

银虫 (正式写手)
确实希望不大建议改其他期刊

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
赞一下 回复此楼
梦想就是让我来实现的，不然就是妄想
2楼2015-05-19 00:29:00
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ssssllllnnnn

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

Translator and Proofreader

【答案】应助回帖

★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
book2005593: 金币+1, 感谢参与解答~ 2015-05-19 13:32:17
对于一个具体的基因表达，如果没有在蛋白水平上的分析价值不大。如果有可能，尽可能补上这一部分，否则你讨论起来都没有底气，因为只有在蛋白水平上看到其变化，才可以讨论其可能的功能作用。我同意审稿人1的意见。
赞一下(2人) 回复此楼
3楼2015-05-19 01:34:37
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

marineman

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

爱八卦爱生活

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
补充内容改投吧，主编没给啥机会

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2015-05-19 05:32:43
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ljq158

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
拒稿重投过两次，每次审稿都找新审稿人，三次共找6个审稿人，最后还是六个里面2个拒稿，最后被拒。
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2015-05-19 07:53:05
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

old_yang

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
book2005593: 金币+1, 感谢参与解答~ 2015-05-19 13:32:33
chenenslogan: 金币+10, ★★★★★最佳答案, 的确，主编回复额，说如果补上这个数据，乐意重新评估 2015-05-19 20:43:30
lack of functional analysis e.g. on protein level. 不知道这个问题对楼主来说是否好回答？或者有数据可以解释？

如果能补点数据的话，做些讨论，应该可以回复。
赞一下 回复此楼
6楼2015-05-19 08:52:13
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chenenslogan

金虫 (正式写手)
附上主编最后的回复：
As you've noticed, the major point was that there are no functional data
related to protein activity. If you would be able to perform additional
experiments, and provide such data, I would be happy to see your
manuscript submitted again for evaluation.
赞一下 回复此楼
everythinghappensforthebest
7楼2015-05-19 20:44:26
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 chenenslogan 的主题更新
71/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭