| ²é¿´: 1362 | »Ø¸´: 5 | |||
wangcodyľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Çó´óʦָµã£¨½¹¼±µÈ´ýÖ¸µã£© ÒÑÓÐ3È˲ÎÓë
|
|
±¾È˸ÕͶÁ˵ÚһƪÎÄÕ£º Ò»Éó2¸öÉó¸åÈË£¬ÎÒ5ÌìºóÐ޻أ» ¶þÉó£¬ËÍÖÁÔÏȵÄÒ»¸öÉó¸åÈË Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Referee: 2 Rating: Routine Recommendation: Reject Comments to the Author The authors have made some changes to their original manuscript in line with referee comments - but in doing so have introduced new errors and inconsistencies. It is no better than the original and on seeing this routine chemistry a second time with no real improvement, I see no option but to reject.The manuscript has been amended from its original submission but the use of English has not improved, the schematic is worse from use of a format that does not meet international criteria (numerical subscripts are for the number of groups while superscripts define compound types), and the conclusions are given little if any more emphasis or explanation. 9ÔÂ18ÈÕ£¬ÎÒ¸øÖ÷±àдÁË»ØÐÅ£¬ÒªÇóÖØÐÂÐ޸ģ¬Ï£ÍûÄÜre-submit,ÖØÐÂÌá½»¡£ Ö®ºó£¬ÏµÍ³³öÏÖ£º¡± 1 Unsubmitted and Manuscripts in Draft ¡°£¬ Çë½Ì¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã£¬ÕâÊÇʲôÇé¿ö£¿±à¼Í¬ÒâÖØÐÂÐ޸ĺóÌá½»Â𣿠лл£¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
281Çóµ÷¼Á£¨0805£©
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
293Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§336·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
»·¾³ÁìÓòÈ«¹úÖØµãʵÑéÊÒÕÐÊÕ²©Ê¿1-2Ãû
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶306Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þ
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
301Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ìì½ò´óѧ»¯Ñ§¹¤ÒÕרҵ£¨081702£©315·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
302Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
26²©Ê¿ÉêÇë
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Çó¸ßÊÖÖ¸µãCdSeÁ¿×ÓµãµÄÎüÊÕ·åÏêϸ½âÊÍ£¡£¡£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ʼÖÕÓÐÔ×ÓδָÈϳöÀ´£¬Çó¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã¡£
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Áٽ籥ºÍ¿÷µÄ²â¶¨·½·¨ £¬Çó´óʦÃÇÖ¸µã
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Çó´óʦָµ¼Õã½´óѧ»·¾³¹¤³ÌÄÄλµ¼Ê¦±È½ÏºÃ
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
»ÆÂÌɫҳÑÒ¼Ð×ϺìɫҳÑҺͱ¡²ãÄàÑÒ·´Ó³ÁËʲô³Á»ý»·¾³£¬Çó´óʦָµã¡£
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
ÖØ½á¾§²½Ö裬Çó¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã
ÒѾÓÐ35È˻ظ´
ÇóÊýѧ¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã£¬°ïæ·ÖÎö£ºÀûÓþعÀ¼Æ·½·¨µÃµ½µÄ²ÎÊýµÄ¹À¼Æ¶¼ÊÇÎÞÆ«µÄÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÎÒ²»ÊÇҽѧרҵ£¬µ«ÎªÁ˸¸Ç×À´´ËÇó¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã¡
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
¹òÇó¸ßÊÖÖ¸µãһϣ¬´Ë¾äÓ¢ÎÄͶ¸åÒªµÄÒâ˼£¬¼±¼±¼±¼±¼±£¡
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
origin 8×Ô¶¨Ò幫ʽ£¬compile failed£¬Çó¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã¡£¡£¡£
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÔñУÃÔ㣡ÇëÇó¸÷λ´óʦ°ïæָµãÃÔ½ò£¬¸Ð¼¤²»¾¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
¾«ÓÍÒÖ¾úÊÔÑéMICÔõô²â¶¨°¡£¿Çó¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
ÇóÄÉÃ×ѹºÛר¼ÒºÍ×ö¹ýµÄ¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
Çó¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã½ðºÍÒøSERS»îÐԵIJî±ð
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Çó¸ßÊÖÖ¸µãwitting·´Ó¦
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
Çó¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã:¶¯Ì¬¹âÉ¢É䣨DLS£© µÄÈý¸ö½á¹ûÄĸö¸ü¾ßÓдú±íÐÔ
ÒѾÓÐ33È˻ظ´
western blot ÇóÖú£¬Çë¸ßÊÖÖ¸µãÒ»ÏÂ
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÎÄÕ¼ÓÃÁË£¬¿ÉÊÇÎÒ²»ÖªµÀÏÖÔÚµÄ״̬ÊÇʲôÒâ˼£¬Çë¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú/½»Á÷¡¿ÇëÇó¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã£¬°ïæ½âÊÍÏÂTMHMMÔ¤²â½á¹û
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Çó¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã ±ù´×ËẬÁ¿µÎ¶¨
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
NCBI blast ½á¹ûһЩ²ÎÊýµÄº¬ÒåÇó¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
eagles123
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 154 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 5854.4
- É¢½ð: 1607
- ºì»¨: 12
- Ìû×Ó: 667
- ÔÚÏß: 700.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 322286
- ×¢²á: 2007-03-11
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »·¾³Î¢ÉúÎïѧ
2Â¥2014-09-19 10:42:52
×Ô˽µÄè1988
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- Ó¦Öú: 4800 (¸±½ÌÊÚ)
- ¹ó±ö: 6.746
- ½ð±Ò: 50040.4
- É¢½ð: 11517
- ºì»¨: 256
- ɳ·¢: 134
- Ìû×Ó: 11684
- ÔÚÏß: 1473.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2004083
- ×¢²á: 2012-09-16
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Óлú·Ö×Ó¹¦ÄܲÄÁÏ»¯Ñ§
- ¹ÜϽ: ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
wangcody: ½ð±Ò+1, ¡ïÓаïÖú, лл 2014-09-21 08:32:04
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
wangcody: ½ð±Ò+1, ¡ïÓаïÖú, лл 2014-09-21 08:32:04
|
ÕâÖÖÇé¿ö£¬²»ÐèÒª¸ø±à¼Ð´ÐÅ£¬Ö±½ÓÐ޸ĺð´ÐµÄÂÛÎÄÌá½»£¬×¢Ã÷֮ǰͶ¸å¹ýµÄ±àºÅ£¬ËµÃ÷ÒѾ×öÁËÄÄÐ©ÖØÒªÐ޸ģ¬»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û£¬Ìá½» ¡°1 Unsubmitted and Manuscripts in Draft¡±Õâ¸ö״̬һ°ãÊÇÖ¸ÄãÎÄÕÂÌá½»²»ÍêÈ«£¬ÀàËÆÓÊÏäÀïÃæµÄ²Ý¸åÒ»Ñù |
3Â¥2014-09-19 12:30:49
brucefan
ר¼Ò¹ËÎÊ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +218 - Ó¦Öú: 422 (˶ʿ)
- ½ð±Ò: 2294.8
- É¢½ð: 1720
- ºì»¨: 88
- Ìû×Ó: 1423
- ÔÚÏß: 670.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3048965
- ×¢²á: 2014-03-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔ II £ºµç×ӽṹ
- ¹ÜϽ: ·Ö×ÓÄ£Äâ
4Â¥2014-09-19 14:33:14
wangcody
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2084
- É¢½ð: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 291
- ÔÚÏß: 112.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1129315
- ×¢²á: 2010-10-22
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÉúÎïÒ½Óø߷Ö×Ó²ÄÁÏ
|
Thank you for your email and for your interest in resubmitting your manuscript. I have had another look at your manuscript and the referees comments, and if you are able to fully address all of the referees concerns and substantially improve the paper, we would be willing to consider a resubmission of the work. However, please be aware that the manuscript must be significantly different to the previous submission ¨C a manuscript with only minor revisions made will be rejected without review. In particular, the novelty of the work must be clearly highlighted in the resubmission and the conclusions must be re-written and strengthened, with additional experimental work if possible. Furthermore, resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance and further review will be necessary. If you have any further queries please don¡¯t hesitate to get in touch. Thanks and best regards, |
5Â¥2014-09-20 10:19:29
wangcody
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2084
- É¢½ð: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 291
- ÔÚÏß: 112.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1129315
- ×¢²á: 2010-10-22
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÉúÎïÒ½Óø߷Ö×Ó²ÄÁÏ
6Â¥2014-09-20 10:20:46













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
5