24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1294  |  回复: 5
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wangcody

木虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 求大师指点(焦急等待指点) 已有3人参与

本人刚投了第一篇文章:
一审2个审稿人,我5天后修回;
二审,送至原先的一个审稿人
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Referee: 2
Rating: Routine
Recommendation: Reject
Comments to the Author
The authors have made some changes to their original manuscript in line with referee comments - but in doing so have introduced new errors and inconsistencies. It is no better than the original and on seeing this routine chemistry a second time with no real improvement, I see no option but to reject.The manuscript has been amended from its original submission but the use of English has not improved, the schematic is worse from use of a format that does not meet international criteria (numerical subscripts are for the number of groups while superscripts define compound types), and the conclusions are given little if any more emphasis or explanation.
9月18日,我给主编写了回信,要求重新修改,希望能re-submit,重新提交。
之后,系统出现:” 1  Unsubmitted and Manuscripts in Draft “,
请教高手指点,这是什么情况?编辑同意重新修改后提交吗?
谢谢!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

brucefan

专家顾问 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
编辑啥意见?如果编辑拒了,就不要挣扎了。除非文章有很大的改进,不然有机会重投也会再次被这个审稿人拒。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
4楼2014-09-19 14:33:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wangcody 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见