| 查看: 2542 | 回复: 18 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
请大家帮我分析下审稿意见 已有10人参与
|
||
|
投稿六个月后终于有了意见，请大家帮忙分析下如何修改，修改后录用可能性大不大？ Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Reviewers' comments: The authors must improve the paper by: The results section must be improved. Especially, the quality of figures. It is not easy to understand the robot trajectories. Another form of presentation must be considered. What differences will be in real robot implementation. Reviewer #2: In this paper, Considering dynamic environment with the least path length constraint?cooperative path planning algorithm for multiple mobile robot systems is developed. Simulation results are provided. However, the overall quality of paper is not enough for journal publication. The proposed distributed prioritized planning method is straightforward and the contribution is minor. Some grammar typos: "with geometrical constrains", etc. Many equations are given in a bad way. Reviewer #3: Please, improve the English and the organization of your paper. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有12人回复
-
2025年遐想
已经有4人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 大家帮忙看下一个审稿意见
已经有12人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，有些地方不太明白，请大家帮忙分析一下，谢谢
已经有5人回复
- 大家帮我看一看怎么回复审稿人
已经有8人回复
- 请大家帮忙分析下
已经有14人回复
- 大家请帮我看看这个审稿意见是什么意思？
已经有7人回复
- 大家帮我看下，专家审稿意见里面有这么一句，是什么意思哦？
已经有21人回复
- 请大家帮我分析一下这种情况，我应该怎么办？
已经有14人回复
- 大家帮看一下这个审稿意见棘手不，谢谢了。
已经有22人回复
- materials letters 审稿意见大家帮忙看一下啊，谢谢
已经有17人回复
- 这么个审稿意见，录用几率大吗？
已经有20人回复
- 《电子与信息学报》两个审稿意见返回，大家帮忙分析一下可能的结果吧！
已经有10人回复
- 这种审稿意见是什么意思啊？怎么回复好哦
已经有41人回复
- 求高人帮忙分析下APL审稿意见
已经有7人回复
- SCI审稿意见回来了，编辑给的moderate revision，麻烦大家帮分析一下，有BB
已经有28人回复
- 审稿意见“negative controls.”到底啥意思？
已经有3人回复
- 专家审稿意见，请大家帮忙分析！
已经有5人回复
- 论文审稿意见回来了，大家看看如何回复啊
已经有16人回复
- Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒，大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
已经有63人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 文章的审稿意见，大家帮忙看看！
已经有6人回复
- 请问大家《宇航学报》的审稿流程？
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见，大家帮忙看看
已经有8人回复
- 请大家帮忙看看审稿人意见
已经有10人回复
- 请大家帮忙看看如何回复审稿意见
已经有4人回复
18楼2014-05-12 12:06:19