24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 740  |  回复: 1

xiaoxiao270

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] BMCL审稿意见,求深入翻译,求指点

大年初二回了篇文章的审稿意见,大修,其中一个审稿意见理解不透,不知该从哪个角度进行修改,求虫友指点:
This manuscript presents the anticancer activities of some new secondary metabolites from plant origin. The activities are tested on four cancer cell lines and are one or two orders of magnitude lower than the activity of the chosen defence drug 5-fluorouracil. These results are interesting perse. The authors also attempt to establish some SAR by empirically  comparing their structures within the series of isolated compounds and with some reports from other authors. Although this is an ingesting preliminary insight it is just  semiquantitative and cannot be the basis for the conclusions. I ask the authors to review their conclusions accordingly and to pay attention to some other details as annotated in the pdf. As the paper contains an amount of original information similar to recently published paper in this journal I would like to advice publication after the necessary corrections are done. Please find attached the annotated manuscript
这审稿意见回的时间,初三就得开工了,手头资料还不是很全,太悲催了,哪位有时间的虫友,能给出一些指导,不胜感谢,金币奉上~~~
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

分离、分离
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

辣笔v小新

荣誉版主 (职业作家)

优秀版主

刚看了哈,大概意思好像是你从文献中参考到的一些数据跟你的试验关联不大,并不能直接用来佐证你的实验结论,所以编辑建议你找一些跟自己试验关联性更大的最新文献参考,还有些“相似性”较大的参考文献编辑会帮你解决,你只需做好前面那些必要的更正(嘿嘿,仅供交流)...

[ Last edited by 辣笔v小新 on 2014-2-16 at 23:25 ]
自强不息,日新月异
2楼2014-02-16 23:24:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 xiaoxiao270 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见