| 查看: 1982 | 回复: 38 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
请大家帮看一下这样的审稿意见接受的希望大不。
|
|||
|
Ms. No.: --- Title: -------- Corresponding Author: Dr.-- Dear Dr. --, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to ----. I have read over your manuscript and feel that it is acceptable for publication with a few minor revisions. Please submit your revision online within 90 days by logging onto the Elsevier Editorial System for ----: http://----- Your username is: ****** If you cannot remember your password, please click the "Send Username/Password" link on the login page. ------ Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: There is not a strong argument for investigating this plant. The activities found were at very high concentrations. They should provide some proof of the identity of the plant e.g. voucher specimen line 125 I think in line 128 should read "extracted with boiling ethanol under reflux" line 188 express ---- values as % or better concentration mg/ml , not 0.04 ml to enable comparison. line 210 how can you state that you had good activity? Your concentration of 1500 mg/ml were 30 times higher than concentration of Silva. Check your calculations could you really dissolve 1.5 g in 1 ml of water? It would be useful to include a Table with results of other authors to see what concentration killed the ticks. Zorloni cited twice Reviewer #2: The manuscript is well but minor revision is necessary Line 125: knife mill? The type of mill must be cited. Line 191: Figures 1 and 2 Line 198: remove space between at and 1.5 还有就是Reviewer #1:的:There is not a strong argument for investigating this plant. The activities found were at very high concentrations.和how can you state that you had good activity? Your concentration of 1500 mg/ml were 30 times higher than concentration of Silva. Check your calculations could you really dissolve 1.5 g in 1 ml of water?怎么回答好呢？，，这两个问题还是不太好回答，但是编辑还是给小修。 |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 Cover_Letter |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有13人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有11人回复
-
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- SSCI大修后再送另一审稿人被拒，请大家帮看一下意见
已经有32人回复
- materials letters 审稿意见大家帮忙看一下啊，谢谢
已经有17人回复
- 麻烦大家帮忙看一下审稿人的第一条意见怎么回复啊
已经有5人回复
- 急，请大家帮忙看看这个审稿意见，困惑.......
已经有13人回复
- 意见返回，麻烦大家帮忙看看这是什么意思，还有希望吗
已经有9人回复
- 请大家帮忙分析下这句审稿意见是什么意思
已经有4人回复
- 专家审稿意见，请大家帮忙分析！
已经有5人回复
- 关于审稿人的意见，请大家帮忙。着急。。。。。
已经有4人回复
- 大家帮我看看这个审稿意见
已经有23人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，大家帮忙看一下。。
已经有9人回复
- 文章的审稿意见，大家帮忙看看！
已经有6人回复
- 【讨论】大家帮我看看审稿意见呗！！！
已经有7人回复
- 【求助】请求大家帮忙看一下审稿人的回复
已经有6人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，大家帮我看看还有希望吗
已经有3人回复
- 审稿意见，大家帮忙看看
已经有8人回复
- 请大家帮忙看看如何回复审稿意见
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不
已经有24人回复
babero
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 632 (博士)
- 金币: 38230.9
- 散金: 59
- 红花: 41
- 帖子: 14020
- 在线: 2067.7小时
- 虫号: 458624
- 注册: 2007-11-13
- 专业: 自然地理学
3楼2013-05-09 21:26:44
LifePursuit
木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
- 应助: 272 (大学生)
- 金币: 70230.3
- 散金: 5156
- 红花: 104
- 沙发: 17
- 帖子: 125956
- 在线: 2961.2小时
- 虫号: 2406939
- 注册: 2013-04-08
- 专业: 聚合物共混与复合材料
2楼2013-05-09 20:58:05
lfdzxy
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 55 (初中生)
- 金币: 2676.9
- 散金: 365
- 红花: 8
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 1282
- 在线: 310.2小时
- 虫号: 2209286
- 注册: 2012-12-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料的力学行为
4楼2013-05-09 21:38:45
5楼2013-05-09 22:02:51
