| ²é¿´: 244 | »Ø¸´: 0 | ||
lavender_12гæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÇóÖú£º»Ø´ðÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÎÊÌâ
|
|
Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÎÊÌ⣺ Page 5: Line 25-41: The experimental description was vague without sufficient technical details. How the catalyst particles were immobilized on the glass plate? If it was, as the author described, ¡°set¡± on a glass plate, I am afraid that the little magnetic fan, which was used to ensure the complete mixing of the reactor, would suspend the nanoparticles to be aerosols. However, if the authors meant that the catalyst was immobilized, it should be described explicitly. Maybe I am wrong, but to me it is less likely to immobilize 0.5 g particles on a 13.5 cm2 glass plate as a relatively homogenous thin film. If it was randomly stacked on the glass plate, its grain size and pore distributions would be very difficult to be controlled consistent from one experiment to another. The fan-mixing could eliminate the mass transfer limitation in the bulk air, but it may not be effective to minimize the intraparticle diffusion barrier (if you are not sure whether you system may be in an intraparticle-transport-limited regime). I understand that the objective of all the tests were to study the intrinsic chemical kinetics (i.e., photocatalytic activity), so the authors must convince the readers that their experimental designs were not affected by transport limitation or by the inconsistency of individual experimental conditions. ÎÒÔÚÎÄÖеÄÃèÊö£º 0.5 g of the catalyst was set on a 13.5 cm2 glass plate and placed at the center of the 250 mL reactor. Then 0.5 ML chlorobenzene liquid was injected into the sealed reactor filled with air and allowed to evaporate with a small magnetic stirring fan. Illumination was initialized after it got to adsorption equilibrium. The small fan guaranteed the gases circulation inside the reactor. ÆäʵÎÒÊÇÖ±½Ó½«´ß»¯¼Á·ÛÄ©·ÅÖÃÔÚ´ß»¯¼ÁƬÉϵġ£ÎÒÄÜÕâô»Ø´ðÂ𣺠The catalyst particles were immobilized on the glass plate by setting on the frosted glass plate. The observations showed that no aerosols take place. It may be attributed to the big molecular mass of KLaTi2O6 (370g/mol). [ Last edited by missu001 on 2013-3-11 at 16:51 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
0817Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ËÕÖÝ´óѧ280¸´ÊÔµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
0817ÕÒµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
רҵÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ149È˻ظ´
PDFÔÚÏßѹËõÈí¼þ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏ/»¯Ñ§Ïà¹Ø×¨Òµ2026¼¶Ñ§Êõ/רҵÐÍ˶ʿÑо¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
Çó´ß»¯×÷Óûù´¡µÚÈý°æ £¨Õ翪¼ª) ¿Î¼þ
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
26Äê²ÄÁÏ/»¯Ñ§Ïà¹Ø×¨Òµ²©Ê¿Ñо¿ÉúÕÐÉú ÎÂÖÝ´óѧ»¯Ñ§Óë²ÄÁϹ¤³ÌѧԺ(26ÄêÇï¼¾Èëѧ)
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÇóÖúµç´ß»¯¼ÁÖÆ±¸£¬ÔõôÔÚ̼²¼±íÃæÉú³¤PdCoºÏ½ð
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÇóÖúµç´ß»¯¼ÁÖÆ±¸£¬ÔõôÔÚ̼²¼±íÃæÉú³¤PdCoºÏ½ð
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
ÕÒµ½Ò»Ð©Ïà¹ØµÄ¾«»ªÌû×Ó£¬Ï£ÍûÓÐÓÃŶ~
ÇóÖú£º²»ÖªµÀÔõô»Ø´ðÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÎÊÌ⣿
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÇóÖúÉó¸åÈËÕâ¸öÎÊÌâ¸ÃÈçºÎ»Ø´ð?¼±,ÔÚÏßµÈ!
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÈË·´À¡µÄÒâ¼ûÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú£ºÉó¸åÈ˵ĵÚÒ»¸öÎÊÌâ¾Í°ÑÎÒÄѵÃסÁË£¡
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú Ò»¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÌáÎÊ£¨¹ØÓÚxrdÓëÐÎòµÄÎÊÌ⣩
ÒѾÓÐ34È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú£¡Éó¸åÈ˸ø³öµÄÒâ¼û±È½Ï¼âÈñ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÈçºÎ»Ø¸´£¬ÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²»ÖªµÀÔõô»Ø´ðÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÎÊÌ⣬ÇóÖú´ó¼Ò,(¹ØÓÚ·Ö×ÓɸMCM-41µÄ£©
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
¸ß·ÖÇóÖú£ºÈçºÎ¸ø±à¼Ð´email²µ³âÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú¼¸¾ä»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÓ¢ÎÄ·Òë
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú£ºÈç¾õµÃÉó¸åÈËÌáµÄÒâ¼û²»ÍêÈ«¶Ô£¬ÄǸÃÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈ˰¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
¼±¼±¼±£¡£¡£¡ÇóÖú¸÷λ³æÓÑ£¬ÈçºÎ»Ø´ðÉó¸åÈ˲¹³äʵÑéµÄÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ28È˻ظ´
ÖØ½ðÇóÖúÈçºÎ»Ø´ðÉó¸åÈËÌá³öµÄ¸ÄͶËü¿¯µÄ½¨Òé
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÇëÇó´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´Ò»ÏÂÉó¸åÈ˵Ļظ´
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿DLSÇóÖú£¬Éó¸åÈËÎÊÌ⣬TEM aggregated£¬where as DLS does not
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Çë°ïæ»Ø´ðÉó¸åÈËÌá³öµÄÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú»Ø´ðÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûÇóÖú£¬Ôõô»Ø´ðÄØ
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
¿ÆÑдÓСľ³æ¿ªÊ¼£¬ÈËÈËΪÎÒ£¬ÎÒΪÈËÈË













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
µã»÷ÕâÀïËÑË÷¸ü¶àÏà¹Ø×ÊÔ´
5