| 查看: 296 | 回复: 0 | ||
lavender_12新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
求助：回答审稿人的问题
|
|
审稿人的问题： Page 5: Line 25-41: The experimental description was vague without sufficient technical details. How the catalyst particles were immobilized on the glass plate? If it was, as the author described, “set” on a glass plate, I am afraid that the little magnetic fan, which was used to ensure the complete mixing of the reactor, would suspend the nanoparticles to be aerosols. However, if the authors meant that the catalyst was immobilized, it should be described explicitly. Maybe I am wrong, but to me it is less likely to immobilize 0.5 g particles on a 13.5 cm2 glass plate as a relatively homogenous thin film. If it was randomly stacked on the glass plate, its grain size and pore distributions would be very difficult to be controlled consistent from one experiment to another. The fan-mixing could eliminate the mass transfer limitation in the bulk air, but it may not be effective to minimize the intraparticle diffusion barrier (if you are not sure whether you system may be in an intraparticle-transport-limited regime). I understand that the objective of all the tests were to study the intrinsic chemical kinetics (i.e., photocatalytic activity), so the authors must convince the readers that their experimental designs were not affected by transport limitation or by the inconsistency of individual experimental conditions. 我在文中的描述： 0.5 g of the catalyst was set on a 13.5 cm2 glass plate and placed at the center of the 250 mL reactor. Then 0.5 ML chlorobenzene liquid was injected into the sealed reactor filled with air and allowed to evaporate with a small magnetic stirring fan. Illumination was initialized after it got to adsorption equilibrium. The small fan guaranteed the gases circulation inside the reactor. 其实我是直接将催化剂粉末放置在催化剂片上的。我能这么回答吗： The catalyst particles were immobilized on the glass plate by setting on the frosted glass plate. The observations showed that no aerosols take place. It may be attributed to the big molecular mass of KLaTi2O6 (370g/mol). [ Last edited by missu001 on 2013-3-11 at 16:51 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
双一流大学湘潭大学“化工过程模拟与强化”国家地方联合工程研究中心招收博士生
已经有52人回复
-
大连海事大学国家级人才团队（船舶洁净能源研究中心）2027年博士研究生招生启事
已经有1人回复
-
化学工程及工业化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有214人回复
-
中国地质大学杨明教授组招收2027年博士能源化学、催化材料方向（每月5K+）
已经有56人回复
-
中国地质大学杨明教授组招收2027年博士能源化学、催化材料方向（每月5K+）
已经有58人回复
-
东南大学杰青团队-催化方向硕博士生、博士后、科研助理招募
已经有0人回复
-
北京工业大学“能源环境协同催化”方向拟招收2027年“学术学位”和“专业学位”博士生
已经有0人回复
-
上海华东理工大学2027年海内外人才招聘
已经有1人回复
找到一些相关的精华帖子，希望有用哦~
求助：不知道怎么回答审稿人的问题？
已经有5人回复
- 求助审稿人这个问题该如何回答?急,在线等!
已经有6人回复
- 审稿人反馈的意见求助
已经有12人回复
- 求助：审稿人的第一个问题就把我难得住了！
已经有7人回复
- 求助 一个审稿人的提问（关于xrd与形貌的问题）
已经有34人回复
- 求助！审稿人给出的意见比较尖锐
已经有9人回复
- 审稿意见如何回复，求助
已经有4人回复
- 不知道怎么回答审稿人的问题，求助大家,(关于分子筛MCM-41的）
已经有10人回复
- 高分求助：如何给编辑写email驳斥审稿人的审稿意见
已经有8人回复
- 求助几句回复审稿人的英文翻译
已经有1人回复
- 求助：如觉得审稿人提的意见不完全对，那该如何回复审稿人啊？
已经有8人回复
- 急急急！！！求助各位虫友，如何回答审稿人补充实验的问题
已经有28人回复
- 重金求助如何回答审稿人提出的改投它刊的建议
已经有14人回复
- 【求助】请求大家帮忙看一下审稿人的回复
已经有6人回复
- 【求助】DLS求助，审稿人问题，TEM aggregated，where as DLS does not
已经有16人回复
- 【求助】请帮忙回答审稿人提出的问题
已经有9人回复
- 求助回答审稿人的问题
已经有2人回复
- 审稿人意见求助，怎么回答呢
已经有11人回复
点击这里搜索更多相关资源科研从小木虫开始，人人为我，我为人人
