24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1409  |  回复: 1
本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看

zasimi

木虫 (正式写手)

Vanier Canada Scholar

[求助] 求助几句回复审稿人的英文翻译

1 由于我们还没有买到标准的寿命测试设备,所以暂时还测量不了器件的寿命。我们也打算下一步继续研究。
2 我们这里采用的是全荧光的器件,而且测量的是forward-viewing efficiency,所以效率的确不是很高。在此我们的目的不是要做高效率,我们也承认很多新材料或者是专利材料已经可以达到很高的效率了,我们的研究重点是要探索实现高亮度下色稳定性好的白光器件结构,并以此作为以后白光器件结构设计的指导。
3 因为OLED的亮度不如LED,所以做照明的话大家都习惯用1000cd/m2来写文章. 然而,实际应用的话这个值是远远不够的。虽然一般的底发射结构基本没有视角依赖问题,基本满足朗伯体分布。这里我们还是测量了器件的角度特性。
lovefamily,lovedream,loveyou,loveme
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

phu_grassman

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

快乐岛、布吉岛岛主

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

zasimi(金币+50, 翻译EPI+1): 谢谢斑竹,还请帮忙核对一下。 2011-08-21 16:00:29

非本专业,有些专业术语还请楼主自己修改。       

1. We can’t measure the lifespan of the device now since we have not bought the standard equipment for testing the lifespan. We intend to go on studying on it.
2. We used the all fluorescent devices here and measured the forward-viewing efficiency, thus the efficiency was indeed not very high. We admit that many new materials or proprietary materials have achieved high efficiency, while it is not expected in our study. What we focus on here is the study on the white-light device structure of good color stability under high brightness, which can act as a guide to the following design of the white-light device structure.
3. Most intend to lay special emphasis on 1000cd/m2 when it comes to lighting because the brightness of OLED is not as good as that of LED. However, this is not enough in practical application. Basically the common bottom-emitting structure doesn’t have the problem of angle dependence and meets the Lambert Distribution. Here we still measured the angle properties of the device.
2楼2011-08-21 14:56:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zasimi 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见