24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3260  |  回复: 12
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

fswang

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 审稿意见看不懂,专家英文不地道

昨天收到了某SCI期刊的审稿意见,三个审稿人,两个同意接受,一个大修,主编给了小修,但是第一个审稿人的意见着实看不懂,可能是他的英文也不好,麻烦大家帮忙给解读。不懂的地方实在是太多了。谢谢大家!!!

//////////////////////////////
(1) It is a rather theoretical result, so possible it should fit better to a less application oriented journal.
    Or take more space to explain the specific application you are aiming at.
这一条能明白。
(2) Improve your structure
    - Your related research is part of the introduction  不懂!
    - Organisation of the paper
(3) You refer to the difference with "real world" problems; can you clarify this difference. 不懂!
- Fig 1. is not informative
- I don't like the name "Ours" to refer to your algorithm, can you give it a name
- The algorithms you compared to from fig 2, are they implemented by you or open toolboxes?
    I can not find what is the case. I found it always weak, when the algorithms are implemented by yourselves. 不懂!
(4) Your conclusions are mainly a summary, the conclusion that your solution is outperforming, is possibly a little bit positive. 不懂
(5) What about computing power? Does your solution solve everything, I don't think so, so what are the weaknesses of your solution?
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

decision in progress

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zjwang1980

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
这审稿人英语也太戳了吧。。

感觉比我的还差很多。。。

哈哈。
7楼2012-12-02 21:06:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 13 个回答

ll9999

专家顾问 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
秋天白云: 金币+1, 感谢交流~! 2012-12-02 10:18:40
Your related research is part of the introduction
就是说 introduction应该简单概括说明你的相关研究内容
2楼2012-12-02 10:05:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

googleuboy

木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
秋天白云: 金币+1, 感谢交流~! 2012-12-02 10:18:45
fswang: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助, 非常感谢您详细的解读。 2012-12-02 11:44:14
esub: 金币+1, 鼓励有价值的回帖 2012-12-29 18:38:57
(2) Improve your structure
     - Your related research is part of the introduction  不懂!
   让你把introduction部分扩充一下,加入自己之前的相关的研究,例如你以前发的paper啥的。
(3) You refer to the difference with "real world" problems; can you clarify this difference. 不懂!
你的文章谈到了与"real world" problems不同的地方,让你指明这些不同点,而不是用“difference”这种指代性的,模糊性的概念。A就是A,B就是B。就如论文中你用了, A,B,C,D, etc。那么请说明“etc”这个等等所指代的具体内容

    I can not find what is the case. I found it always weak, when the algorithms are implemented by yourselves. 不懂!
貌似他不太同意你的观点。。。

(4) Your conclusions are mainly a summary, the conclusion that your solution is outperforming, is possibly a little bit positive. 不懂
可能是认为在你的结论中,你有点夸大了你的算法的精确性啥的。
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
3楼2012-12-02 10:14:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

孤狐孤城

木虫 (著名写手)

怎么感觉是个学生写的,而且还是四级没过的那种
4楼2012-12-02 10:37:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见