|
|
[交流]
LZ什么情况。。一个审稿人要求大修，另外两个直接拒，编辑给了大修
这是编辑的原话，求指导，求安慰，都没有信心改下去了
Editors:
The manuscript has been reviewed by three experts. The reviewers are quite critical. Reviewer #3 recommends that the manuscript may eventually be publishable, but not without a major revision. Reviewer #4 and Reviewer #5 recommend rejection of the manuscript, because it lacks novelty from an applications perspective.
We believe that there is some novelty in this work, but mainly from an instrumental perspective. Therefore, the authors deserve a chance to improve their manuscript in line with the recommendations of the reviewers. The authors should explicitly indicate the novel aspects of this work, both in their response and in the manuscript. They should carefully address all the issues raised by the reviewers and improve the manuscript were possible.
The English should be thoroughly revised, preferably with the aid of a native English speaker.
A final decision as to whether the manuscript can be considered for publication will depend on the response of the authors to the reviewers' comments and on the quality of the revision.
[ Last edited by freexuwen on 2012-7-4 at 16:12 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
查看全部散金贴
|
回复此楼
+1/812
同一个分子，一条来自文献，一条来自AI——不告诉你答案，你会选哪条？
+3