24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4610  |  回复: 27

mlshmily

木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] Revise-大修还是小修?第二个审稿人什么意思?已有14人参与

收到Elsevier期刊的审稿意见:Revise。
但不知道大修还是小修,似乎是Elsevier的审稿意见模板。好像是修改重投,是新投稿吗?
另外,第二个审稿人什么意思?有人说比较危险,他是拒审的意思,可能因为论文太差了。
还有戏吗?
请明白人点拨一二。谢谢!

Dear XXXX,

The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), the Editor In Chief invites you to revise and resubmit your manuscript.

Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments.

If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also:
a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments
AND/OR
b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed

Yours sincerely,

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: I think this manuscript addressed an interesting and potentially promising topic. Also, it is obvious that the authors did an extensive search on the existing reports and research literature. However, I feel that this paper have some areas that need to be addressed.

First, I disagree with the authors' organization of contents……...

Second, …….

Third, the paper should shorten the section on …….

Fourth, ……

Finally, the writing in some sections can be improved (e.g., the last paragraph in page 3).

I hope the authors find the review helpful and wish them good luck with their research in this area.

Reviewer #2: The work is interesting but I wasn't convinced that the discussion or conclusions achieved that much apart from saying the obvious. I did like the way the discussion drew down data from a number of sources thus providing an uninformed reader with a range of good background facts and figures. I would have preferred to see more ambition in the paper's aim. There are many minor errors - often the definite article is missed out, quite a number of spelling errors, some references are very old yet are used to support current understanding. These all need attention. I thought the sources of data were in need of more care. There are other sources that are probably better than some that are mentioned.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

Fung66

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
有戏,但不是大修或小修,可以说是reject,是让你修改后重投。第二个审稿人不是拒审,他看出文章很多问题,如不认同你得出结论的方法,有很多小错误,引用文献太老,这些问题需要修改。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
纯粹为了学术。纯粹为了出国。加油。
2楼2014-02-05 00:08:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

miingbo

新虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我觉得审稿人2认为你的研究方向是好的,但是怀疑你的研究结论:“wasn't convinced that ……achieved that much apart from saying the obvious.”
除此之外,两个审稿人都认为文章逻辑结构以及语言存在很大的问题。
我觉得你是不是推理过程不足以支撑你的结论,有点言过其实了,直白说就是有点吹了
这个真要好好的改一改,先饱满点增加工作量把问题阐述清楚,然后再组织逻辑结构,最后改语言吧

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
3楼2014-02-05 00:16:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

上杉达也

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
是修改状态啊  看样子是大修哦 让你重新调整你的讨论部分,是的更合理可信一些,最好能补充一点有帮助的辅助实验
7楼2014-02-05 08:49:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

kingki

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
增加工作量把问题阐述清楚,组织逻辑结构,改语言
飞越无限
4楼2014-02-05 00:22:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mlshmily

木虫 (著名写手)

太让我感动了,这么晚还有热心人回复。各位辛苦了,奋斗到凌晨啊。
5楼2014-02-05 00:33:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lzusxl

木虫 (文坛精英)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
拒绝稿件~ 这一次的投稿经历完成~ 主页会显示:reject的标志~
如果你感兴趣~或者对于审稿人的意见需要辩驳~ 那就重新修改稿件+辩论的cover letter 重新投稿~
6楼2014-02-05 00:54:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

幼麟儿

木虫 (著名写手)

硕士


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
好好的改,我也是收到了大修的通知

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
心诚则灵!
8楼2014-02-05 09:01:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liusir3836

木虫 (职业作家)

猎手

优秀版主


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
你这样肯定是大修,不过大修小修无所谓的,给修改的机会就表示接受可能性非常大。祝马上接受!

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
态度确定行为
9楼2014-02-05 09:14:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mlshmily

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by lzusxl at 2014-02-05 00:54:23
拒绝稿件~ 这一次的投稿经历完成~ 主页会显示:reject的标志~
如果你感兴趣~或者对于审稿人的意见需要辩驳~ 那就重新修改稿件+辩论的cover letter 重新投稿~

谢谢。稿件状态显示:revise
10楼2014-02-05 11:18:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 mlshmily 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[论文投稿] 希望嫡长子顺利出场! +3 C刊霸王 2024-05-31 4/200 2024-06-02 17:02 by kill_doc
[基金申请] 化学口B0109(高分子合成),拿青年基金一般需要怎样的文章水平? +14 salmon95 2024-05-30 23/1150 2024-06-02 16:37 by 款款飞
[基金申请] 为什么美国要封锁华为而不封锁丘C同呢? +6 zju2000 2024-06-02 7/350 2024-06-02 16:12 by sxjc500
[论文投稿] 选期刊 5+3 jfdhj 2024-05-29 4/200 2024-06-02 13:30 by bobvan
[论文投稿] 编辑对文章提的意见 40+3 qa8386136 2024-06-01 3/150 2024-06-02 13:28 by bobvan
[硕博家园] 每到中夜,情难自抑 +34 sioc-sunj 2024-05-28 58/2900 2024-06-02 02:53 by csyky2007
[教师之家] 在大地上我们只过一生---看完我的阿勒泰上头了好几天,完结那天晚上几乎失眠 +11 瞬息宇宙 2024-05-27 13/650 2024-06-01 22:15 by otani
[考研] 研0二导师分到新来的博士后靠谱吗 +7 sone9 2024-05-31 7/350 2024-06-01 19:10 by 梦燕园
[考博] 24年博士招生 +8 abinit432 2024-05-27 10/500 2024-06-01 17:38 by czp97
[论文投稿] 求Sci期刊推荐 10+4 甄小鱼 2024-05-30 7/350 2024-06-01 10:41 by bobvan
[基金申请] 博后特别资助状态变化 +24 随梦而飞2017 2024-05-30 35/1750 2024-06-01 10:10 by 青岛阳仔
[考博] 广东以理材料系碳点与功能材料课题组 — 2博士名额 / 科研助理 +4 小城夜很美 2024-05-27 11/550 2024-05-31 21:26 by 小城夜很美
[材料综合] 真空封石英管 北京 +4 dessha 2024-05-29 5/250 2024-05-30 16:40 by mpdfwxgui
[文学芳草园] 物是人非 +4 myrtle 2024-05-30 4/200 2024-05-30 15:05 by mapenggao
[论文投稿] 审稿专家比较坚定的让补充实验,但实在没法补充实验,修回还有希望吗? (EPI+1) 3+3 qweasd12345 2024-05-29 6/300 2024-05-30 08:11 by qweasd12345
[基金申请] 信息学部函评结束了吗? +6 ducan21 2024-05-28 7/350 2024-05-29 12:10 by WORLD0256
[论文投稿] 真急着毕业,CPB主编终审17天了,邮件催稿了两次,就是一点动静没有 5+3 kkkk夏 2024-05-28 6/300 2024-05-29 11:18 by hitsdu
[论文投稿] 核心初审被拒,理由是“选题的意义不明确,文章写得不像是科技论文”,怎么改 5+3 工藤雷花樱 2024-05-27 8/400 2024-05-29 10:09 by topedit
[基金申请] 如果您是国自然评审专家 +3 丁香园账户 2024-05-28 3/150 2024-05-29 06:44 by gaohui8888
[论文投稿] EI期刊审稿人邮箱问题 5+3 shier妈妈 2024-05-27 4/200 2024-05-28 14:53 by topedit
信息提示
请填处理意见