| 查看: 5216 | 回复: 27 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
mlshmily木虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
Revise-大修还是小修？第二个审稿人什么意思？已有14人参与
|
||
|
收到Elsevier期刊的审稿意见：Revise。 但不知道大修还是小修，似乎是Elsevier的审稿意见模板。好像是修改重投，是新投稿吗？ 另外，第二个审稿人什么意思？有人说比较危险，他是拒审的意思，可能因为论文太差了。 还有戏吗？ 请明白人点拨一二。谢谢！ Dear XXXX, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), the Editor In Chief invites you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed Yours sincerely, Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: I think this manuscript addressed an interesting and potentially promising topic. Also, it is obvious that the authors did an extensive search on the existing reports and research literature. However, I feel that this paper have some areas that need to be addressed. First, I disagree with the authors' organization of contents……... Second, ……. Third, the paper should shorten the section on ……. Fourth, …… Finally, the writing in some sections can be improved (e.g., the last paragraph in page 3). I hope the authors find the review helpful and wish them good luck with their research in this area. Reviewer #2: The work is interesting but I wasn't convinced that the discussion or conclusions achieved that much apart from saying the obvious. I did like the way the discussion drew down data from a number of sources thus providing an uninformed reader with a range of good background facts and figures. I would have preferred to see more ambition in the paper's aim. There are many minor errors - often the definite article is missed out, quite a number of spelling errors, some references are very old yet are used to support current understanding. These all need attention. I thought the sources of data were in need of more care. There are other sources that are probably better than some that are mentioned. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有30人回复
-
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利，现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈？
已经有8人回复
-
博士申请都是内定的吗？
已经有7人回复
-
读博
已经有5人回复
-
投稿精细化工
已经有4人回复
-
高职单位投计算机相关的北核或SCI四区期刊推荐，求支招！
已经有4人回复
-
导师想让我从独立一作变成了共一第一
已经有9人回复
-
心脉受损
已经有5人回复
-
Springer期刊投稿求助
已经有4人回复
-
小论文投稿
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
审稿意见求助(是小修还是大改？)
已经有13人回复- 第一次投稿 大修后又要大修 各位帮忙看下 希望大不 谢谢啦
已经有12人回复
- 大家请帮我看看这个审稿意见是什么意思？
已经有7人回复
- JACS的article投稿两周后返回，一大修，另一个小修
已经有18人回复
- 审稿人一个拒稿一个大修，编辑给大修，求助
已经有26人回复
- applied energy 审稿意见是revise，嘛意思呢~~~
已经有18人回复
- Journal of membrane science修改求助！
已经有6人回复
- JPCC大修后一个月了还没有消息。。。。。。。。。
已经有13人回复
- 论文两个审稿人让小修，一个审稿人拒绝，结果编辑拒稿了，这种情况还有希望吗？
已经有41人回复
- chemical communications小修，审稿人意见请教
已经有8人回复
- 审稿意见，小修，有些问题不明白
已经有4人回复
- 论文修改第二次了，也没有写大修还是小修，都是revise，第二次修改都半个月还没消息
已经有12人回复
- BT的问题，为什么审稿专家的是minor revise，而系统里编辑给的是 major？？
已经有24人回复
- 论文小修还用返给审稿人吗
已经有13人回复
- 审稿意见：一个大修，两个小修
已经有34人回复
- 我的第一SCI投稿返回意见了，这个算大修还是小修？ Physica A
已经有11人回复
- PRB这样的审稿意见算是大修还是小修？
已经有6人回复
- 小修没有完全回答审稿人意见，会不会悲剧啊？
已经有21人回复
- 请问这是审稿人的意见还是编辑的意见（投稿十天后给发的邮件），中的可能性大吗？
已经有24人回复
- Moderate Revise 后会换审稿人吗？
已经有4人回复
- Revise and Resubmit 之后审稿还是原来审稿人吗
已经有9人回复
- 请看下这个是大修还是小修
已经有18人回复
- 帮忙分析一下这个审稿意见如何？先谢谢各位
已经有9人回复
7楼2014-02-05 08:49:06