24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 5259  |  回复: 27

mlshmily

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
19楼: Originally posted by skyfishing at 2014-02-06 13:19:45
8楼说的挺对“文章逻辑结构的问题,这需要好好改改。个人感觉“I would have preferred to see more ambition in the paper's aim ” 这个意见比较麻烦,好好考虑怎么重新整理文章吧。

I would have preferred to see more ambition in the paper's aim是什么意思?如何领会?
21楼2014-02-06 13:38:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jiahong0602

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
有很大希望的,修改后打开他给你的连接创建resubmittion然后把新的文章上传就好!很有希望的  加油!修改的态度和质量很重要!祝好运!

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
22楼2014-02-06 13:44:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mlshmily

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
22楼: Originally posted by jiahong0602 at 2014-02-06 13:44:41
有很大希望的,修改后打开他给你的连接创建resubmittion然后把新的文章上传就好!很有希望的  加油!修改的态度和质量很重要!祝好运!

谢谢鼓励,没经验啊。很多修改意见不能很好地领会。
23楼2014-02-06 13:54:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jiahong0602

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
23楼: Originally posted by mlshmily at 2014-02-06 13:54:36
谢谢鼓励,没经验啊。很多修改意见不能很好地领会。...

没事的,从简单到复杂依次解决问题!多看几遍审稿意见,把握审稿人问的问题的核心是什么!可以参考虫子们的意见,在木虫上我是受益颇多!

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
24楼2014-02-06 16:54:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mlshmily

木虫 (著名写手)

修改稿已经提交。
目前状态:Revision Submitted to Journal
25楼2014-04-09 10:06:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mlshmily

木虫 (著名写手)

4月24
Required Reviews Completed
26楼2014-04-24 13:56:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mlshmily

木虫 (著名写手)

4月28日
状态:Revise
27楼2014-04-29 18:42:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mlshmily

木虫 (著名写手)

Dear XXXX
The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), the Editor In Chief invites you to revise and resubmit your manuscript.

Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments.
I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Yours sincerely,

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: I think the authors have made appropriate revisions based on reviewers' feedback. The only minor revision I would suggest is the organization of "3.3.3 XXXX": The author(s) should either change the subheading to "3.3.3 XXXX and XXXX" or separate the discussions on information sources from 3.3.3 section. I recommend that the manuscript be accepted after this minor revision.

Reviewer #2: The paper is much improved, the balance and flow are more accessible and the content has developed better strength and a sense of purpose. There are still a relatively large number of minor errors but I feel that once they are addressed then the paper can be accepted.
28楼2014-05-06 13:57:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 mlshmily 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见