| ²é¿´: 1799 | »Ø¸´: 8 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
735624829½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÕâÖÖÇé¿öÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈË
|
||
|
¼òµ¥ÃèÊöÕâÖÖÇé¿ö£ºÎÒÈÏΪûÈË×ö¹ýÕâЩ¶«Î÷£¨Ö»ÊÇÎÄÕÂһСС²¿·Ö£©£¬ÔÚÎÄÕÂÖмòµ¥ËµÁËһϣ¬ºóÀ´Í» È»·¢ÏÖһƪºÜÄÑÕÒµ½µÄÎÄÏ×¾ÓÈ»×ö¹ýÕâÐ©ÍæÒÕ£¬¸ÃÈçºÎ»Ø´ðÉó¸åÈË£º¾ßÌåÈçÏ 1# In my opinion,һЩרҵÓï¾ä , it is not enough to say that they are ¡¡I expect that some kind of conclusion (or speculation) must be given in the text¡£ ÎÒ²»Äܸø³öconclusion£¨ÀàËÆµÄÎÄÏ×¶¼Ã»ÌáÕâЩ£¬ÒòΪÎÒÃǵĹØ×¢µã¶¼²»ÔÚÕ⣬ÓÈÆä×îеÄÎÄÏ×£©£¬ËùÒÔ¾Íspeculationһϣ¬Ð´ÍêÁË£¬»¹Êǵ£ÐÄ×Ô¼ºµÄspeculationÓÐÎÊÌâû¸ÒÌá½»£¨ÀϰåҲͬÒâÎÒµÄspeculation£©¡£ÓÚÊÇÎÒ»»ÁËһϼìË÷·½Ê½£¨ÒÔǰÈÏΪÕâ²»¿ÉÄÜ·¢ÏÖ£©£¬µ«Í»È»·¢ÏÖ1976ÄêÃÀ¹úһƪ²©Ê¿ÂÛÎľ¹È»ÓÐÏà¹ØÌÖÂÛ£¬ËäȻûÓÐÔÚÆäËûÔÓÖÊ·¢±í¡£ ÓÚÊÇÎÒ¾ÍÏëÒýÓÃÒ»ÏÂËûµÄÂÛÎÄ£¬À´»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û¡£ Óöµ½¹ýÕâÖÖÎÊÌâµÄ³æÓÑÃÇ£¬°ïÎÒд¼¸¾ä»Ø¸´µÄ»°°É¡£×¨ÒµÊõÓïÓÃ**´úÌæ¡£Ð»Ð»£¡ ÖÐÇï¿ìÀÖ£¡£¡£¡ [ Last edited by 735624829 on 2011-9-9 at 21:09 ] |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
286Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
085601Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
302Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¿¼Ñл¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶µ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸985
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
328Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ó¢ÓïÁù¼¶551£¬ÓпÆÑоÀú
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
»úеר˶325£¬Ñ°ÕÒµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶306Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
»ï°éÃÇ£¬×£ÎÒÉúÈÕ¿ìÀÖ°É
ÒѾÓÐ26È˻ظ´
333Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
0854¿ØÖƹ¤³Ì 359Çóµ÷¼Á ¿É¿çרҵ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
ÕâÖÖÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÊÇʲôÒâ˼°¡£¿Ôõô»Ø¸´ºÃŶ
ÒѾÓÐ41È˻ظ´
ÇëÓоÑéµÄ³æÓѰï°ï棺Ӧ¸ÃÔõÑù»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈË ÔÚÏߵȣ¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ËÓöµ½¹ýÕâÖÖÉó¸å»Ø¸´£¬ÊÇÍñ¾ÜÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ39È˻ظ´
ÂÛÎÄСÐÞ»¹Ó÷µ¸øÉó¸åÈËÂð
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
SCIÉó¸åÈ˲»Éó¸å£¬¸ø³ö²»Æ¥ÅäÉó¸åÒ⣨Ñо¿ÄÚÈÝÓëËû³åÍ»£©
ÒѾÓÐ29È˻ظ´
ͶÁËһƪӢÎÄÎÄÕ£¬Éó¸åÈ˿϶¨ÁËÏë·¨£¬µ«Êǽ¨Òé¾Ý¸å¡£¿ÉÖ÷±à¸ø³ö´óÐÞ¡£
ÒѾÓÐ22È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åLangmuir£¬Éó¸åÈ˶¼Ëµ¿ÉÒÔ·¢±í£¬±à¼¾Ü¸å£¬ÕâÖÖÇé¿öÓбØÒªÉêËßÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
Çë½ÌÕâÖÖÇé¿öÏÂÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈË£¿
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ͶӢÎÄÔÓÖ¾Éó¸åÒâ¼û¾ÓÈ»ÊÇÖÐÎÄ£¡£¡£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ65È˻ظ´
ÖØ½ðÇóÖúÈçºÎ»Ø´ðÉó¸åÈËÌá³öµÄ¸ÄͶËü¿¯µÄ½¨Òé
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
±»J.Phys.Chem C¾ÜÁË£¬2¸öÉó¸åÈËÒâ¼û²î±ðºÜ´ó£¬Óöµ½ÕâÖÖÇé¿öÎÒ¸ÃÕ¦°ì
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
Polymer Ͷ¸å½»Á÷
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
´óÂÛÎÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û¡°ÂÛÎÄ·ÂÕæÃ»ÓкÍʵ¼Ê½áºÏ¡¡¡±£¬ÈçºÎ»Ø´ðÉó¸åÈË
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÕâÖÖÇé¿ö£¬Ôõô»Ø¸´Reviewer
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÇëÎʸ÷λÀÏʦ£¬ÕâÖÖÇé¿öÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈË£¿
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
735624829
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 9 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 635.1
- É¢½ð: 743
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 755
- ÔÚÏß: 146.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 759458
- ×¢²á: 2009-04-28
- רҵ: ºËÎïÀí
3Â¥2011-09-10 09:48:37
purezhang
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 31 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 517.1
- É¢½ð: 693
- ºì»¨: 29
- Ìû×Ó: 1153
- ÔÚÏß: 270.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1053168
- ×¢²á: 2010-07-07
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÉúÎï´ó·Ö×ӽṹÓ빦ÄÜ
2Â¥2011-09-09 23:55:27
shannysp
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 30 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2447.4
- É¢½ð: 200
- Ìû×Ó: 259
- ÔÚÏß: 32.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1319209
- ×¢²á: 2011-06-09
- רҵ: ÐźÅÀíÂÛÓëÐźŴ¦Àí
4Â¥2011-09-10 09:56:46
735624829
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 9 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 635.1
- É¢½ð: 743
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 755
- ÔÚÏß: 146.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 759458
- ×¢²á: 2009-04-28
- רҵ: ºËÎïÀí
|
From the same experiment (²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ×£© and latest experiment(²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ× ), the coincidences 1173-992 and 1173-1052 were not observed or showed, but from early W.K.Tuttle III ¡®s work£¨²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ×£¬ÎÒÒÔǰû·¢ÏÖ£©£¬ the coincidences 1173-992 and 1173-1052 had been suggested. So the 992 and 1052 keV should belong to 113In by gating on the overlap of 1173 keV transition. We are sorry for our neglect. |
5Â¥2011-09-10 09:59:33













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥