Enclosed is a review for your manuscript. Your manuscript has been assessed by one reviewer so far. Having read the comments, I reached the decision that the manuscript was not suitable for publication in xxx unless additional experiments are performed, so that you can discuss in depth the mechanisms involved in the transformations of the interesting phenomena you describe.
The experiments will take longer that the time span allowed for revisions. I suggest you perform the work recommended by the referee and include this in a new manuscript which you may decide to submit to xxxxx.
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Major revisions needed as noted.
Comments:
The manuscript by Ma et al. report the xxxxxx. The observations were original and very interesting. The data quality was good and phenomenological interpretation plausible. It is publishable after addressing the following concerns.
----------------
New physical insights or important experimental developments: Good