应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 交流 » 大家有遇到这种情况吗？ 这样的审稿意见 按要求重投上去中的机会大吗？
21/1返回列表
查看: 1196  |  回复: 11
查看全部回帖 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

mameng8086

木虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 大家有遇到这种情况吗？ 这样的审稿意见 按要求重投上去中的机会大吗？

Enclosed is a review for your manuscript. Your manuscript has been assessed by one reviewer so far. Having read the comments, I reached the decision that the manuscript was not suitable for publication in xxx unless additional experiments are performed, so that you can discuss in depth the mechanisms involved in the transformations of the interesting phenomena you describe.

The experiments will take longer that the time span allowed for revisions. I suggest you perform the work recommended by the referee and include this in a new manuscript which you may decide to submit to xxxxx.

Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: Major revisions needed as noted.

Comments:
The manuscript by Ma et al. report the xxxxxx. The observations were original and very interesting. The data quality was good and phenomenological interpretation plausible. It is publishable after addressing the following concerns.
----------------
New physical insights or important experimental developments: Good

Conclusions adequately supported by data: Good

Clarity of presentation: Fair

Potential for scientific impact: Good
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼 2011-08-28 10:23:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wozoule2005

木虫 (著名写手)
意见挺好的啊。
回复此楼
7楼2011-08-28 12:21:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 mameng8086 的主题更新
21/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭