|
|
[交流]
大家有遇到这种情况吗？ 这样的审稿意见 按要求重投上去中的机会大吗？
Enclosed is a review for your manuscript. Your manuscript has been assessed by one reviewer so far. Having read the comments, I reached the decision that the manuscript was not suitable for publication in xxx unless additional experiments are performed, so that you can discuss in depth the mechanisms involved in the transformations of the interesting phenomena you describe.
The experiments will take longer that the time span allowed for revisions. I suggest you perform the work recommended by the referee and include this in a new manuscript which you may decide to submit to xxxxx.
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Major revisions needed as noted.
Comments:
The manuscript by Ma et al. report the xxxxxx. The observations were original and very interesting. The data quality was good and phenomenological interpretation plausible. It is publishable after addressing the following concerns.
----------------
New physical insights or important experimental developments: Good
Conclusions adequately supported by data: Good
Clarity of presentation: Fair
Potential for scientific impact: Good |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
查看全部散金贴
|
回复此楼
+1/826
同一个分子，一条来自文献，一条来自AI——不告诉你答案，你会选哪条？
+3