| 查看: 16750 | 回复: 63 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒,大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
|
|||
|
前一段时间我投了一篇Crystal Growth & Design,第一次修改是大修,我修改后,编辑又让我小修,小修时编辑和审稿人的回信是这样的 The reviews for your manuscript are enclosed with this letter. Please consider the reviewers' comments. They have raised points that require consideration and revision of the manuscript before it is suitable for publication. However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript should be acceptable for publication in Crystal Growth & Design. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible, 90 days at the latest. We look forward to seeing your paper in Crystal Growth & Design. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after minor revision. Comments: In this revised version, the authors have taken into account most of the reviewers' comment and I find it publishable. My only comment concerns the data listed in Table 2: I do not believe that one can determine them with such an accuracy; uncertainties should be evaluated. 小修我投上去过了25天还是没有消息,我实在等不住了,就给编辑发了一封催稿信,结果两天以后收到编辑的拒稿信,信得内容如下: Thank you for considering Crystal Growth & Design for your manuscript submission. Due to the large number of manuscripts submitted to our journal and the increased demands that are being placed on our reviewers, we must assess closely, and prior to external review by expert specialists, whether a manuscript fits within the scope of the Journal and whether it will have sufficient appeal to a significant segment of our readership. Manuscripts that are not within the scope of the Journal (see http://pubs.acs.org/page/cgdefu/about.html) or do not provide clear evidence for a significant advance that is likely to be of broad interest to the crystal growth or crystal engineering communities, will not be considered further for publication. In my view, your manuscript does not meet these standards and therefore, I regret that we cannot consider it further for publication. Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to Crystal Growth & Design. I hope that you will continue to consider our journal for publication of your papers in the future. 这是怎么回事呀?请各位虫友帮我分析一下啊,好郁闷呀,我感觉我很认真的按照审稿人的意见修改了,怎么还是杯具了! |
» 猜你喜欢
275求调剂
已经有9人回复
083000学硕274求调剂
已经有5人回复
【求调剂】085601材料工程专硕 | 总分272 |
已经有5人回复
275求调剂
已经有13人回复
0856,材料与化工321分求调剂
已经有8人回复
085701环境工程,267求调剂
已经有12人回复
320分,材料与化工专业,求调剂
已经有7人回复
085701环境工程求调剂
已经有8人回复
295材料工程专硕求调剂
已经有5人回复
265求调剂
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
帮我看看这断口怎么分析?多谢。
已经有13人回复
请大家帮我分析下该去法国还是去澳大利亚?
已经有37人回复
文章小修后被拒,然后又被接收的曲折之路,散金币!
已经有212人回复
有没有小修后被拒的?
已经有39人回复
对比CrystEngComm和Crystal Growth & Design
已经有11人回复
大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见,录用几率大不?
已经有24人回复
投稿Crystal Growth & Design
已经有34人回复
crystal growth and design审稿周期多长啊,着急。
已经有7人回复
求助crystal growth & design投稿 需要的晶体个数?
已经有5人回复
大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修?希望大吗?(散50B,每人2个)
已经有68人回复
Crystal Growth and Design 小修中的两个棘手问题。
已经有10人回复
被tetrahetron拒稿,大家帮我分析一下!
已经有3人回复
crystal growth design 审稿大家都是多长时间
已经有13人回复
投稿Journal of Crystal Growth被拒,一句内容没看懂,麻烦哪位帮忙解释一下。
已经有16人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
Postdoc position in Hangzhou Normal University (陈健翔组博后招聘)
+1/83
江南大学招收具有3年海外博后经历的青年教师
+1/80
电力全国重点实验室双一流A类长江学者团队招2026年全日制博士1名(4月3日截止)
+2/74
留学--博士招生
+1/51
招聘︱国家纳米科学中心丁宝全杰青团队诚聘博士后(特别研究助理)
+2/48
青岛大学固态电池研究团队招收材料、化学、物理等方向博士研究生
+2/40
2026 年山东建筑大学金属增材制造方向硕士研究生调剂公告
+1/39
【分享】招收08工学硕士(要求过国家线)
+1/34
【实战型】【生物医药】2026青岛大学招博士生 含少数民族骨干计划2名!
+1/14
长江大学石油工程学院2026年硕士调剂招生公告!!!
+1/13
韩国庆熙大学 Yu Taekyung 教授招2026年博士研究生
+1/10
中国科学院上海硅酸盐研究所招聘科研助理(纳米材料与生物应用方向)
+1/7
宁波东方理工大学余鹏课题组2026年上海交大联培博士生、博士后、科研助理招聘
+1/5
天津大学利物浦福州联合学院中外合办硕士【首批offer已发出】
+1/5
【博士招生】天津理工大学国家杰青王铁课题组招收2026年博士研究生
+1/3
各种IgG抗体表达系统
+1/3
2026南京林业大学双一流建设高校——化学工程学院招收化学/材料相关专业硕士生
+1/2
武汉纺织大学2026年招收硕士研究生【高性能、功能纺织复合材料方向】
+1/2
欧洲手性光谱方向ROA/CPL/Raman imaging招收博士研究生及联合培养生(布拉格)
+1/1
2026年北京石油化工学院环境学科-水污染控制工程方向课题组欢迎您
+1/1
26楼2011-06-28 03:12:37
2楼2011-06-27 17:42:57
3楼2011-06-27 17:48:24
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
|
Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. 可能是编辑搞错了,楼上说的对,你仔细核对一下 |
4楼2011-06-27 17:50:21
简单回复
2011-06-27 18:00

















回复此楼
