24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

duxin_30

铜虫 (正式写手)

应助: 10 (幼儿园)
金币: 672.2
散金: 107
红花: 22
帖子: 996
在线: 468.2小时
虫号: 578931
注册: 2008-07-04
专业: 有机高分子功能材料

[交流] 文章给了小修，大家帮我看看该改些啥？已有2人参与

RT。。。此文2月份投JPS part A，4月被reject&resubmitted, 然后实验全部重新做(自我感觉新的实验就是为两位审稿人量身订做的。。。），论文重写，三个月后投回去，昨天给了小修，我来来回回看了几次好像我也就只能改下英语了是吗？

下面是信：
Dear XX:

Manuscript # JPOL-XXX (formally JPOL-XXX) entitled “XXXXX” which you submitted to the Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry has been reviewed.  The comments of the referee(s) are included at the bottom of this letter.

The two responding reviewers are favorable and consider your submission suitable for publication in our Journal, and they suggested MINOR revision before it is accepted, with some important comments to be seriously considered upon your revision.
Therefore, we would like to encourage you revise the submission in accordance to the comments and the suggestions by the reviewers.  Please be reminded that the authors are supposed to attach a cover letter (message) that describes in detail how and where revision has been made in the revised version.

中间全部套话，省略

Referee(s)’ Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
The authors have made major revisions in the manuscript draft.  I am satisfied with the answer to my suggestions, and I recommend the revised manuscript to be accepted by J.Polym. Sci. Part A. after improvement of the English and some writing.

Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
I appreciate the siginificant revision of this paper, to address concerns raised in my first review.  Figure 2 makes a convincing case for the role of Tg in the XXXXX for this system.

The revised manuscript adds many new graphs and addresses some of the other issues that can effect the XXXXXX.  The authors also provide plausible hypothesis to explain their results. These results are of some interest.  However, the complexity of the XXXX systems makes it difficult to change just one variable at a time and to ascribe the observed changes to a single factor. The paper is weakend by no direct measurements of the XXXXX (SEM for example).  However, I think the case for the effect of Tg on XXX has been made.

I recommend publication after some minor revisions.  First the authors need to carefully edit the paper for correct English.  Some examples I found:
此处也省略吧。。。因为最后时间不够匆匆写了就投回去了，语法错误一堆。。。

I also ask the authors to emphasize the clear finding shown in Figure 2 related to Tg.  The paper would be much stronger if the paper was limited to a discussion of this result.

我看了半天审稿人意见，感觉除了英语，其它似乎没什么可改了？（要改还得补实验，现在暑假做不了测试，不知道要多久才能补上。。）

回复此楼