| 查看: 1077 | 回复: 2 | |||
[交流]
文章给了小修，大家帮我看看该改些啥？ 已有2人参与
|
|
RT。。。此文2月份投JPS part A，4月被reject&resubmitted, 然后实验全部重新做(自我感觉新的实验就是为两位审稿人量身订做的。。。），论文重写，三个月后投回去，昨天给了小修，我来来回回看了几次好像我也就只能改下英语了是吗？ 下面是信： Dear XX: Manuscript # JPOL-XXX (formally JPOL-XXX) entitled “XXXXX” which you submitted to the Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry has been reviewed. The comments of the referee(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The two responding reviewers are favorable and consider your submission suitable for publication in our Journal, and they suggested MINOR revision before it is accepted, with some important comments to be seriously considered upon your revision. Therefore, we would like to encourage you revise the submission in accordance to the comments and the suggestions by the reviewers. Please be reminded that the authors are supposed to attach a cover letter (message) that describes in detail how and where revision has been made in the revised version. 中间全部套话，省略 Referee(s)’ Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The authors have made major revisions in the manuscript draft. I am satisfied with the answer to my suggestions, and I recommend the revised manuscript to be accepted by J.Polym. Sci. Part A. after improvement of the English and some writing. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author I appreciate the siginificant revision of this paper, to address concerns raised in my first review. Figure 2 makes a convincing case for the role of Tg in the XXXXX for this system. The revised manuscript adds many new graphs and addresses some of the other issues that can effect the XXXXXX. The authors also provide plausible hypothesis to explain their results. These results are of some interest. However, the complexity of the XXXX systems makes it difficult to change just one variable at a time and to ascribe the observed changes to a single factor. The paper is weakend by no direct measurements of the XXXXX (SEM for example). However, I think the case for the effect of Tg on XXX has been made. I recommend publication after some minor revisions. First the authors need to carefully edit the paper for correct English. Some examples I found: 此处也省略吧。。。因为最后时间不够匆匆写了就投回去了，语法错误一堆。。。 I also ask the authors to emphasize the clear finding shown in Figure 2 related to Tg. The paper would be much stronger if the paper was limited to a discussion of this result. 我看了半天审稿人意见，感觉除了英语，其它似乎没什么可改了？（要改还得补实验，现在暑假做不了测试，不知道要多久才能补上。。） |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
291分调剂
已经有9人回复
-
调剂求收留
已经有34人回复
-
291 求调剂
已经有38人回复
-
22408 312求调剂
已经有17人回复
-
一志愿华中农业071010，320求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
290调剂生物0860
已经有41人回复
-
291求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
211本科材料化工求调剂
已经有23人回复
-
山东省基金2026
已经有9人回复
-
药学求调剂
已经有13人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 大家帮我看看清华这个导师啥意思？
已经有14人回复
- 第一次写文章，大家帮我看看这种情况能不能发表
已经有10人回复
- 麻烦大家帮我看看这个拒稿意见怎么修改和改投，谢谢！
已经有3人回复
- 大家帮我看看，我这种情况属于大修还是小修？
已经有3人回复
- Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒，大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
已经有63人回复
- 求助：文章再次修改（小修）， List of change和给编辑审稿人的信没有改
已经有6人回复
- 文章要求小修，请大家帮忙看看意见
已经有3人回复
- 急问！！！第一次投稿，意见是小修，但是有一个关于修改的问题向大家请教
已经有38人回复
- 第一次投稿被拒了，大家帮我看看还有没有希望修改后重投。谢谢！！！！！
已经有10人回复
- 文章小修，发现没标通讯作者，再改合适么？
已经有16人回复
- 无金币。。哭求帮助。。“被拒，大家帮我看看，是重投还是改投？”
已经有16人回复
- 大家帮我看看这句话对吗。如果不对怎么改呢？
已经有7人回复
- 【求助】小修后编辑的意见，大家帮我看看！
已经有24人回复
- 第一次投稿,评审结果出来了,大家帮我看看好吗
已经有36人回复
- 帮我看看啊:编辑是要大修还是小修？
已经有15人回复
liuying_hero
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
互助小英哥
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.749
- 金币: 16741.4
- 散金: 27311
- 红花: 47
- 沙发: 593
- 帖子: 89341
- 在线: 1730.4小时
- 虫号: 1042013
- 注册: 2010-06-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 细胞信号转导
- 管辖: 电脑疑难求助
2楼2010-08-13 08:37:27
3楼2010-08-13 09:18:24
