24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (999)
>虫友互识 (31)
>导师招生 (20)
>论文投稿 (20)
>考研 (18)
>找工作 (17)
>教师之家 (16)
>基金申请 (15)
>硕博家园 (15)
>考博 (15)
>公派出国 (15)
>博后之家 (13)
>休闲灌水 (12)
>论文道贺祈福 (11)
>有机交流 (10)
>文献求助 (8)

返回列表

pangrui1985

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 25 (小学生)
金币: 23.2
红花: 6
帖子: 142
在线: 89.2小时
虫号: 2808500
注册: 2013-11-18
专业: 凝聚态物性I:结构、力学和

[求助] 并行版的SIESTA不能运行已有1人参与

编译能通过，但运行老是报错
mpirun noticed that process rank 34 with PID 24030 on node fn043 exited on signal 11
连tests里面的si64都报错，所以我觉得不是简单的内存问题。
下面是我的make文件，请高手指教一下出了什么问题？是ldau版的
.SUFFIXES:
.SUFFIXES: .f .F .o .a .f90 .F90

SIESTA_ARCH=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu--Intel

FPP=
FPP_OUTPUT=
FC=/home-fn/compiler/mpi/openmpi-1.4.4-pgi/bin/mpif90
RANLIB=ranlib

SYS=nag

SP_KIND=4
DP_KIND=8
KINDS=$(SP_KIND) $(DP_KIND)

FFLAGS=-g -assume byterecl -heap-arrays 64
FPPFLAGS= -DMPI -DFC_HAVE_FLUSH -DFC_HAVE_ABORT
LDFLAGS=

ARFLAGS_EXTRA=

FCFLAGS_fixed_f=
FCFLAGS_free_f90=
FPPFLAGS_fixed_F=
FPPFLAGS_free_F90=

BLAS_LIBS=-L/home-fn/compiler/intel/mk/lib/intel64 -lmkl_scalapack_ilp64 -lmkl_cdft_core -lmkl_intel_ilp64 -l
mkl_core -lmkl_sequential -lmkl_blacs_intelmpi_ilp64 -lpthread -lm
LAPACK_LIBS=-L/home-fn/compiler/intel/mk/lib/intel64 -lmkl_scalapack_ilp64 -lmkl_cdft_core -lmkl_intel_ilp64
-lmkl_core -lmkl_sequential -lmkl_blacs_intelmpi_ilp64 -lpthread -lm
BLACS_LIBS=-L/home-fn/compiler/intel/mkl/lib/intel64 -lmkl_blacs_intelmpi_ilp64 -lmkl_intel_ilp64 -lmkl_core
-lmkl_sequential -lpthread -lm
SCALAPACK_LIBS=-L/home-fn/compiler/intel/mkl/lib/intel64 -lmkl_scalapack_ilp64 -lmkl_intel_ilp64 -lmkl_core -
lmkl_sequential -lpthread -lm

COMP_LIBS=dc_lapack.a liblapack.a libblas.a

NETCDF_LIBS=
NETCDF_INTERFACE=

LIBS=$(SCALAPACK_LIBS) $(BLACS_LIBS) $(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS) $(NETCDF_LIBS)

#SIESTA needs an F90 interface to MPI
#This will give you SIESTA's own implementation
#If your compiler vendor offers an alternative, you may change
#to it here.
MPI_INTERFACE=libmpi_f90.a
MPI_INCLUDE=/home-fn/compiler/mpi/openmpi-1.4.4-pgi/include
DEFS_MPI = -DMPI

#Dependency rules are created by autoconf according to whether
#discrete preprocessing is necessary or not.
.F.o:
$(FC) -c $(FFLAGS) $(INCFLAGS) $(FPPFLAGS) $(FPPFLAGS_fixed_F)  $<
.F90.o:
$(FC) -c $(FFLAGS) $(INCFLAGS) $(FPPFLAGS) $(FPPFLAGS_free_F90) $<
.f.o:
$(FC) -c $(FFLAGS) $(INCFLAGS) $(FCFLAGS_fixed_f)  $<
.f90.o:
$(FC) -c $(FFLAGS) $(INCFLAGS) $(FCFLAGS_free_f90)  $<

回复此楼