24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 875  |  回复: 2

xyljilin

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 投的JIOPM,编辑给的审稿意见不太明白,希望好心的虫友帮帮忙

1. Did the authors check the presence of M to ligand charge- transfer in their sytstems? The ligand should possess a good antenna effect.
我做的这个是Pb的配合物,两种配体的发光峰位分别在 354 nm和 444 nm处,配合物的发光峰位在508 nm。我把它归为“ a metal-centered transition involving the s and p metal orbitals”。编辑提出如上疑义,到底应该归属成什么呢?
2. Also, the structures of complexes 2 and 3 should be discussed in more details taken in consideration the backing effects.
什么是“the backing effects”?
3. Figure 2: Why is the water molecule omitted from the network structure of complex 1? The water molecules should play an essential role in connecting the 1D-chains creating 3D- network. If this is not the case, the authors should clear this argument.
由于水分子上的氢原子加不上,所以没有传统氢键,此处该怎么办?????
我试着加氢了,结果处理完以后有很多a类错误,同时,原来没有参加配位的游离的水分子也配位了。
4. -In the discussion the authors should discuss how their new structure relates to similar compounds such as. Citation are only for M-O and M-N lengths. Please correct.
这句话的意思是我应该与相似的化合物作比较?而不是仅仅比较键长?
5. -In last sentence of TGA section, the authors have writen: "We believe that different coordinated modes are the main reasons that lead to the difference in their TGA". But, TGA curves of samples are similar and I do not see differences in their TGA. Please explain and correct.
这句话直接删除可以吗?还是有其他的处理方式?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xyljilin

银虫 (小有名气)

怎么没人回复呢?呜呜
2楼2013-05-24 19:46:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

你的问题都太专业了,去相关专业版交流可能更合适
3楼2013-05-25 06:01:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 xyljilin 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见