24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2958  |  回复: 13
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

NASA5797

木虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 审稿意见回来,要不要改投还是要申诉,给位虫友给个意见啊,现在好乱

Reviewer #1
IMPORTANCE:
   3. Suitable for a specialized journal
DATA OBTAINED VERIFY HYPOTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS:
   Yes
APPROPRIATE LENGTH:
   Yes
OTHER JOURNAL:
   
RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE:
   3. Reject, but may become acceptable after major revisions

Reviewer #2
IMPORTANCE:
   3. Suitable for a specialized journal
DATA OBTAINED VERIFY HYPOTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS:
   Yes
APPROPRIATE LENGTH:
   
OTHER JOURNAL:
   More suitable for Lab on a Chip journal
RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE:
   3. Reject, but may become acceptable after major revisions

以下是编辑回信
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS.
The reviewer comments are attached below.

Unfortunately, on the basis of the reviewer comments, we are not able to
accept it for publication in Advanced Functional Materials. Since we receive
considerably more contributions than we can possibly publish in the limited
available space, we can almost only accept those manuscripts that receive
clear-cut positive reviewer reports. In addition, a further selection
process has to be applied, in which an article is also assessed as to
whether it is of great significance for the development of a topical area of
materials science. This means that papers judged to be more suitable for a
more specialized journal are not accepted for publication.

My suggestion is that we consider the paper instead for our sister journal,
the Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics.

JPS: Polymer Physics has recently undergone a relaunch and now has a broad
scope that encompasses all physical aspects of polymer systems from polymer
electronics, through optical properties to biopolymers.

At JPS: Polymer Physics we would be happy to expedite the review process for
your manuscript -- additional external review would probably not be
necessary if the referees’ concerns are addressed.

Your paper would be published online rapidly after acceptance, and we could
also offer additional exposure in the community via our news site
MaterialsViews.com.

If you choose to follow this suggestion, please upload your manuscript as a
new submission to JPS: Polymer Physics using
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jpolb. In your cover letter, please mention
this correspondence.

Thank you for considering ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS for publication. We
regret disappointing you on this occasion and I hope you will consider us
for your future manuscripts.
各位虫友麻烦给点建议啊,现在好乱
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

Time is everything!
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

NASA5797

木虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by nono2009 at 2013-05-17 12:02:00
两个审稿人都是reject,申述没有用

Reject, but may become acceptable after major revisions 也不可以吗?
Time is everything!
3楼2013-05-17 12:04:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 14 个回答

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
NASA5797: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2013-05-17 12:04:11
两个审稿人都是reject,申述没有用
2楼2013-05-17 12:02:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by NASA5797 at 2013-05-17 12:04:53
Reject, but may become acceptable after major revisions 也不可以吗?...

如果两个审稿人都是这个结论,编辑给拒稿是很正常的,除非该期刊缺少稿源。
4楼2013-05-17 12:06:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

NASA5797

木虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by nono2009 at 2013-05-17 12:06:26
如果两个审稿人都是这个结论,编辑给拒稿是很正常的,除非该期刊缺少稿源。...

谢谢,按照第二个审稿人改投lab on chip 几率大吗?
Time is everything!
5楼2013-05-17 12:21:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见