| 查看: 1744 | 回复: 38 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
请大家帮看一下这样的审稿意见接受的希望大不。
|
|||
|
Ms. No.: --- Title: -------- Corresponding Author: Dr.-- Dear Dr. --, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to ----. I have read over your manuscript and feel that it is acceptable for publication with a few minor revisions. Please submit your revision online within 90 days by logging onto the Elsevier Editorial System for ----: http://----- Your username is: ****** If you cannot remember your password, please click the "Send Username/Password" link on the login page. ------ Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: There is not a strong argument for investigating this plant. The activities found were at very high concentrations. They should provide some proof of the identity of the plant e.g. voucher specimen line 125 I think in line 128 should read "extracted with boiling ethanol under reflux" line 188 express ---- values as % or better concentration mg/ml , not 0.04 ml to enable comparison. line 210 how can you state that you had good activity? Your concentration of 1500 mg/ml were 30 times higher than concentration of Silva. Check your calculations could you really dissolve 1.5 g in 1 ml of water? It would be useful to include a Table with results of other authors to see what concentration killed the ticks. Zorloni cited twice Reviewer #2: The manuscript is well but minor revision is necessary Line 125: knife mill? The type of mill must be cited. Line 191: Figures 1 and 2 Line 198: remove space between at and 1.5 还有就是Reviewer #1:的:There is not a strong argument for investigating this plant. The activities found were at very high concentrations.和how can you state that you had good activity? Your concentration of 1500 mg/ml were 30 times higher than concentration of Silva. Check your calculations could you really dissolve 1.5 g in 1 ml of water?怎么回答好呢？，，这两个问题还是不太好回答，但是编辑还是给小修。 |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 Cover_Letter |
» 猜你喜欢
谈谈两天一夜的“延安行”
已经有15人回复
-
EST投稿状态问题
已经有6人回复
-
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有15人回复
-
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有11人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿
已经有16人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
-
聘U V热熔胶研究人员
已经有10人回复
-
求助文献
已经有3人回复
-
投稿返修后收到这样的回复，还有希望吗
已经有8人回复
-
三无产品还有机会吗
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- SSCI大修后再送另一审稿人被拒，请大家帮看一下意见
已经有32人回复
- materials letters 审稿意见大家帮忙看一下啊，谢谢
已经有17人回复
- 麻烦大家帮忙看一下审稿人的第一条意见怎么回复啊
已经有5人回复
- 急，请大家帮忙看看这个审稿意见，困惑.......
已经有13人回复
- 意见返回，麻烦大家帮忙看看这是什么意思，还有希望吗
已经有9人回复
- 请大家帮忙分析下这句审稿意见是什么意思
已经有4人回复
- 专家审稿意见，请大家帮忙分析！
已经有5人回复
- 关于审稿人的意见，请大家帮忙。着急。。。。。
已经有4人回复
- 大家帮我看看这个审稿意见
已经有23人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，大家帮忙看一下。。
已经有9人回复
- 文章的审稿意见，大家帮忙看看！
已经有6人回复
- 【讨论】大家帮我看看审稿意见呗！！！
已经有7人回复
- 【求助】请求大家帮忙看一下审稿人的回复
已经有6人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，大家帮我看看还有希望吗
已经有3人回复
- 审稿意见，大家帮忙看看
已经有8人回复
- 请大家帮忙看看如何回复审稿意见
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不
已经有24人回复
njfocus
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 75 (初中生)
- 金币: 2772.1
- 散金: 246
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 487
- 在线: 370.2小时
- 虫号: 739095
- 注册: 2009-04-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机非金属基复合材料
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1