24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3470  |  回复: 37
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

求知者001

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

全球通,能否?!

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

[交流] 每周一听——那些年我们一起练过的听力(第48期)已有29人参与

每周一听——那些年我们一起练过的听力(第48期)


如果对本活动有兴趣就收听我吧!!!

特别提示:本期(第48期)是年前最后一期,第49期将在2月16号继续。欢迎大家届时继续关注并参与,并预祝大家新蛇年大吉、万事顺意!

注意:参与活动的虫子请把自己的答案以站内信形式发送给我,并在活动帖里占位回复,方便评分,下周六下期活动发布之前有效哦。还有其他不懂之处,请在此帖里面直接留言回复,我们将尽快回答。

奖项——听写后正确填空者可得BB奖励
评分规则:
每篇设空十处,难度逐渐增加,每答对一空奖励一个BB,答对第十空奖励2BB。全对的虫子可得15个BB奖励。大家加油哦~~~~~~




    New research shows that overweight or even mildly obese people have a lower risk of early death than people considered to be normal weight.

    Researchers    (1)    the results of 97 studies. Most of the studies were less than 10 years old. They included almost three million    (2)    from around the world, including the United States, Canada, China, Taiwan, Brazil, India and Mexico.

    The researchers work at the National Center for Health Statistics, part of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    They found that people who are    (3)    overweight or slightly obese were five to six percent less likely to die from all causes than people of normal weight. People with higher obesity ratings, however, had almost a 30 percent greater risk of death    (4)    to normal-weight individuals.

    Katherine Flegal was the    (5)    author of the study. She says she was not surprised that overweight people would not have a higher risk of death.

    “Because we’d actually already read a lot of this literature and realized it was likely that [mortality rates for] overweight would be at least not higher than normal weight. I guess I was a little bit surprised that it was definitely lower. And I was also surprised that the lower rates of obesity also didn’t seem to differ from normal weight.”

    But she says the difference in    (6)    appears to be small between normal-weight people and those who are overweight or mildly obese.

    The study has    (7)    about “body mass index,” or BMI. This is a measurement of body fat as a ratio of height to weight. BMI guidelines were used as a basis for the study. In recent years, many public health experts have promoted body mass index    (8)    predict the risk of health problems. But a person's BMI can be misleading in some cases.

    Steven Heymsfield is the executive director of the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. He says people can be    (9)    and in good health, but might weigh more because they are more muscular.

    “It’s very common in the military, for example, where you have young men and women who are very physically fit -- their BMI can be a little higher. And so the military knows that, and they check people with body fat measurement if they exceed the BMI guideline.”

    Still, Dr. Heymsfield says people should not think gaining extra weight is OK just because of the new findings.    (10)    . He and a colleague wrote an editorial that appeared along with the study in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

上期活动答案:
1.        jobless
2.        flowing
3.        observers
4.        means
5.        recession
6.        got them into trouble
7.        a bigger threat
8.        deliver fiscal clarity
9.        There’s an old saying that
10.        Many people want to know how America’s political leaders will move to cut the budget deficit while protecting the economy
[ Last edited by 求知者001 on 2013-2-2 at 18:22 ]
回复此楼

» 本帖附件资源列表

  • 欢迎监督和反馈:小木虫仅提供交流平台,不对该内容负责。
    本内容由用户自主发布,如果其内容涉及到知识产权问题,其责任在于用户本人,如对版权有异议,请联系邮箱:xiaomuchong@tal.com
  • 附件 1 : 第48期.mp3
  • 2013-02-02 16:25:07, 1.66 M

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

风之声-每周一听 English 那些年我们一起听过的听力 毕业设计及研究生资源

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

人生最曼妙的风景,是内心的淡定与从容。
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

simon1123

铜虫 (小有名气)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
求知者001: 金币+15, 恭喜,全对~~ 2013-02-05 12:00:47
顶楼主并且占位! 志在必得!
金币要还多多益善!
10楼2013-02-05 02:46:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 求知者001 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[硕博家园] 和导师撕破脸了 +17 圆满123456 2024-11-13 21/1050 2024-11-16 00:30 by ZZZemmm
[第一性原理] 有没有要一起买VASP版权的,可以6个人 5+3 变成小神 2024-11-14 7/350 2024-11-15 23:52 by dxcharlary
[论文投稿] chemical science和advanced science哪个好一点 +6 yly150 2024-11-12 6/300 2024-11-15 21:06 by hcj9909053
[论文投稿] 找不到审稿人 +6 吉祥如意141913 2024-11-13 6/300 2024-11-15 16:48 by LEyblyt
[基金申请] 变性人申请基金咋算性别? +21 leicahfs 2024-11-11 21/1050 2024-11-15 14:54 by 跳鱼拨刺
[基金申请] 去年七月底入站的还能申请下一批吗? +4 brightwo 2024-11-14 4/200 2024-11-15 14:18 by gazi1111
[硕博家园] 实验进度 +9 麻辣烫。 2024-11-11 14/700 2024-11-15 13:14 by hanweiguo
[有机交流] 二甲胺的使用 20+5 太阳谷 2024-11-14 13/650 2024-11-15 13:11 by xiaomei1031
[考博] 联系的博导说有时间聊一聊 我回复了自己可以的时间后 博导就没再回复 +4 evan0489 2024-11-15 4/200 2024-11-15 13:10 by hanweiguo
[论文投稿] 论文返修状态变成了awaiting AE recommendation 10+3 猪小耍 2024-11-13 12/600 2024-11-15 08:41 by 北京莱茵润色
[硕博家园] 课题和专业一点都不相关怎么办 +7 imt4n9 2024-11-11 10/500 2024-11-15 01:55 by 成长虫
[硕博家园] 大龄已婚想读博如何 +15 米娅阳 2024-11-11 18/900 2024-11-14 14:18 by xiaomi0401
[教师之家] 处在人生职业的分水岭 +4 otani 2024-11-13 4/200 2024-11-14 14:17 by mddzwo
[基金申请] 第76批博士后面上大概什么时间公示 +6 探际者 2024-11-11 7/350 2024-11-14 10:06 by Foxicut88
[论文投稿] 要不要撤稿另投 10+4 wangzhesd 2024-11-09 8/400 2024-11-14 09:09 by LIU_V
[基金申请] 浙江省青基怎么看A还是B? +8 ToallGoof 2024-11-11 14/700 2024-11-13 09:11 by Praybest
[论文投稿] 二审审一年的佛系编辑 +10 thefoxrain 2024-11-09 15/750 2024-11-12 19:27 by lide966
[论文投稿] 论文接受后,编辑部发邮件提醒缺少附件 15+4 上善若水明泪 2024-11-10 4/200 2024-11-12 14:24 by 北京莱茵润色
[论文投稿] renewable energy 添加作者 15+3 Hebauwww12 2024-11-09 4/200 2024-11-11 08:42 by 北京莱茵润色
[基金申请] 要求论文发表日期在项目执行期内,论文发表日期是在线日期还是见刊日期 +6 Jiangnanyu1 2024-11-09 7/350 2024-11-10 17:49 by jurkat.1640
信息提示
请填处理意见