| 查看: 2220 | 回复: 6 | |||
[交流]
clean-soil,air,water什么情况，修改前都快接收了，最后拒稿？
|
|
类似经验：http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=4402131 昨晚看到这篇帖子，结果今天就悲剧了，大家看看吧，求安慰，求建议！ 1. On clen.201200236.R1: Editor: Bandyopadhyay, Amitava Comments to the Author: The reviewer comments are now available that suggest minor revision. I have also read the MS and it is more or less acceptable. But I am unable to accept the authors following response: "The trends of OMA formation efficiency are similar in other experiments conducted with different initial oil concentrations. However, there are only two representatives’ been described. Because putting all data in same figure will make it difficult to read." Authors must show such variation : Shaking time (x-axis) vs E% (y-axis) at various oil concentration (at least four) for the two types [in an additional Fig (a) & in Fig (b)]. A few lines may be added in the relevant portion of the text (R&D Section). The manuscript is still require some revision as described above. 2. On clen.201200236.R2 Comments to the Author: The manuscript can now be acceptable considering the extent of revision made by the Authors. For clarity, minor corrections/changes are however, suggested on the manuscript which is attached. The authors have made a great effort. Thanks to them. 3. On clen.201200236.R3 The paper has been substantially corrected now. However, three minor corrections as noted are to be incorporated. Attached is your submitted revised version with those corrections indicated thereto. Show a sample calculation for the ratio of mineral to dispersed oil as indicated in the relevant portion of the text. Thanks for your great effort. 4. For clen.201200236.R4 The manuscript has not been revised in accordance with the requirements of our Journal and hence it is recommended that the Manuscript be rejected. 都按照要求改了，不知道怎么最后就给了这么个结论！主编貌似也是不看的，每次都是cc给这个Editor: Bandyopadhyay, Amitava 主编回信：I am sorry to inform you that your revised manuscript, "Enhanced Oil-Mineral Aggregation with Modified Bentonite", has not been found acceptable for publication in "CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water". The journal receives many more manuscripts than it can publish and difficult decisions must be made on the basis of an article's perceived priority. Your manuscript did not achieve a high enough ranking to be accepted. While disappointing, I must emphasize that this decision is final. 不知道该如何申诉~~~请大牛给意见。 [ Last edited by lisa1985 on 2012-8-22 at 12:39 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
考博求助
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有9人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有10人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- JPS投稿接收了
已经有26人回复
- WM with editor 一个月，正常吗？
已经有3人回复
- 投desalination and water treatment，如何知道投稿是否成功？
已经有6人回复
- 圣诞前一天文章莫名其妙被拒稿，申诉成功后今天戏剧接收
已经有231人回复
- 因为语言等细节问题被拒稿，修改后重投给原来的杂志收的可能性大么？
已经有9人回复
- 【Pure water】I am happy that they are very busy.
已经有9人回复
- 请问：修改稿如果不按照审稿人的意见修改，会被拒掉么
已经有14人回复
- 文章接收后修改投稿单位
已经有12人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
上海合全药业-酶催化工艺开发
+1/997
-
2027年能源利用与优化调度国际会议（EUOE 2027）
+1/900
-
招聘科研助理
+1/193
-
吉林大学物理学院李亮老师磁性材料方向申请考核博士招生
+5/55
-
中国石油大学（北京）国家级大人才团队2027级博士招生2名：化学、材料、石油工程
+2/50
-
福建师范大学刘斯宝课题组 招收2027级博士研究生（专业为化学）
+1/43
-
昆明医科大学“柔性生物电子与智能传感课题组”招聘科研助理
+1/36
-
浙江大学医学院附属第一医院（国家重点实验室）微生态与代谢团队招聘技术员及助理
+1/27
-
西安交通大学材料学院先进储能材料研究团队招聘科研助理
+1/21
-
北京大学环境学院张子帅研究员招收博士后与科研助理
+1/13
-
中国科大-合肥国家实验室冷原子量子网络团队招聘启事
+2/12
-
厦门大学具身智能传感器与人机交互实验室招收2027级博士研究生
+5/5
-
厦门大学具身智能传感器与人机交互实验室招收2027级博士研究生
+5/5
-
博士后招聘-清华大学深圳国际研究生院-智慧健康建筑实验室
+1/5
-
27申博-有国奖有sci
+1/3
-
高通量 WB 视角下的抗体芯片：多重蛋白定性筛查技术体系与方法学梳理
+1/2
-
经费如何使用，花不完怎么办？
+1/2
-
西安交通大学材料学院先进储能材料研究团队招聘科研助理
+1/2
-
B细胞分泌因子：从抗体产生到免疫调控的多元功能谱系
+1/2
-
高温合金焊料求助
+1/1
2楼2012-08-22 11:10:00
3楼2012-09-14 19:10:10
4楼2012-09-14 22:04:15
5楼2012-09-14 22:20:24
6楼2012-09-14 23:16:42
7楼2012-09-14 23:17:42
